Journal Information
Vol. 9. Issue 1.
Pages 104-114 (January - February 2020)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
Not available
Vol. 9. Issue 1.
Pages 104-114 (January - February 2020)
Original Article
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.10.034
Open Access
Nanoindentation of zirconium based bulk metallic glass and its nanomechanical properties
Visits
NOTICE Undefined index: totales (includes_ws_v2/modulos/cuerpo/info-item.php[202])
Karuppasamy Pandian Marimuthu, Kwangmin Lee, Jungmoo Han, Felix Rickhey, Hyungyil Lee
Corresponding author
hylee@sogang.ac.kr

Corresponding author.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sogang University, Seoul, 04107, Republic of Korea
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (8)
Show moreShow less
Tables (3)
Table 1. Nanoindentation test methods and parameters.
Table 2. Effect of peak load on experimental results (dP/dt = 40 mN/s).
Table 3. Corrected experimental results by AFM measurements.
Show moreShow less
Abstract

Nanoindentation experiments with a Berkovich tip are performed on zirconium based bulk metallic glass (Zr-BMG, Zr65Cu15Al10Ni10) to study its deformation and mechanical properties (elastic modulus and hardness) at nanoscale. Further to reveal indentation-size effect (ISE), the influence of loading rate and peak and cyclic loads on evaluated nanomechanical properties are investigated in detail. The loading rate has significant effect on serration flow (pop-in), which gets predominant at higher loads. According to the Oliver-Pharr method, hardness becomes peak load-independent, whereas elastic modulus increases with the load. The same phenomenon is observed with sinus and progressive multicycle indentation methods. However, observation of significant pile-up (the ratio of elastic and total energy We/Wt ≈ 0.33 < 0.5) questions the application of the Oliver-Pharr method to Zr-BMG; therefore, evaluated nanomechanical properties are corrected with the projected contact area measured by atomic force microscopic (AFM) and finite element analysis to reduce ISE.

Keywords:
Bulk metallic glass
Mechanical properties
Nanoindentation
Indentation-size effect
AFM
Full Text
1Introduction

Bulk metallic glasses (BMGs) are amorphous alloys and have excellent physical and mechanical properties such as high hardness, strength and good wear and corrosion resistance [1,2]. In recent years, investigations have been devoted for developing advanced BMGs to obtain the emerging functional materials. Unlike crystalline materials, combination of a wide range of metals with diverse chemical compositions produces unusual microstructures. As a result, BGMs exhibit novel structural properties with unconventional deformation behavior. Due to the amorphous structure, BMGs have a completely different plastic deformation mechanism when compared with crystalline alloys [2]. However, at room temperature, catastrophic growth of unhindered shear bands due to highly localized plastic deformation shows the inherent brittleness of BMGs when deforming in a bulk form. Although, much research works has been done to improve the structural properties of BMGs [3–8], the maximum dimensions of BMG are still small for large scale industrial and engineering applications [9]. Therefore, it is important to know the mechanical properties and thermal stability of BMGs for manufacturing reliable and quality products.

Nanoindentation techniques have become a significant tool for determining mechanical properties such as elastic modulus, hardness, fracture toughness and plastic and creep parameters of materials at a small/nano scale. So far, deformation mechanisms of BMGs have been investigated by using indentation techniques to determine their mechanical properties [8,10–14]. Guo et al. [10] measured the indentation fracture toughness of various BMGs by using nanoindentation techniques with Berkovich tip as conventional crack-tip opening displacement (CTOD) testing methods are complex due to specific specimen geometry and size requirements. Vincent et al. [13] employed both micro-and nano-indentation techniques and revealed the microstructure-dependent deformation and mechanical properties of zirconium-based BMGs (Zr–Cu–Al–Ni alloy system). The variation in mechanical properties of Zr-based BMGs due to hydrogen addition were studied with nanoindentation techniques, too [4]. As the deformation mechanism of BMG is unconventional, certain BMG shows different deformation behaviors from another BMG [15,16]. Therefore, it is inappropriate to derive or apply similar nanoindentation techniques such as Oliver-Pharr (OP) method [17] for different BMGs without prior understanding of their deformation mechanism. It was also revealed that BMG shows a significant indentation-size effect (ISE) i.e. change in mechanical properties with increasing indentation depth [18,19]. Although, previous studies report the general effect of test conditions, i.e. loading rate [20,21], peak loads on mechanical properties, detailed understandings on the deformation behaviors of each BMG would promote an accurate prediction of its nanomechanical properties.

As Zr-based BMGs are the emerging engineering materials [22], investigating the deformation behaviors of Zr65Cu15Al10Ni10 (at. %) (Zr-BMG) by nanoindentation become a topic of interest in this study. Compared with other multi-constituent BMGs (i.e. Mg- and Hf- based BMGs), Zr-based BMGs has high glass-forming ability and super plasticity at room temperature. Some interesting phenomena such as metastable phase formation, rapid solidification, deformation-induced nano-crystallization and associated mechanical property enhancement were also observed in these Zr-based BMGs [22]. In addition, sports goods, structural frames and electronic castings [23,24] were also practically manufactured by using Zr- based BMGs [25]. In healthcare-related products such as thin film metallic glass (TFMG)-coated needles, bio-implants [26,27], Cu-bearing Zr-BMGs show good antimicrobial (antibacterial) behaviors. Based on compression tests at room temperature, Qiu et al. [22] reported a high ductility (25%) in Zr65Cu15Al10Ni10 due to the formation of multiple shear bands by nanocrystallization.

The nanomechanical properties such as elastic modulus and indentation hardness of Zr65Cu15Al10Ni10 BMG are evaluated by using nanoindentation techniques based on three nanoindentation modes namely (i) standard single indentation with constant loading rate, (ii) progressive multi-cyclic indentation and (iii) sinus mode indentation. Further to reveal ISE on the nanomechanical properties, the effects of loading rate and peak and cyclic loads on the nanomechanical properties are investigated. Numerical simulations with linear Drucker-Prager (DP) model are also performed to compare the experimental load-depth curves with numerical curves. Accordingly, appropriateness of OP method for Zr-BMG that exhibits a significant pile-up around the indentation mark is assessed to obtain consistent nanomechanical properties.

2Material and methodology2.1Material

Zr–Cu–Al–Ni alloy with the composition of Zr65Cu15Al10Ni10 (at. % - atomic weight percentage) (Avention, South Korea) was fabricated with hot-press method by applying high heat and pressure on the mixed-powder particles. The specimen dimension is 15 × 15 × 2 mm3, and the surfaces were mechanically grinded and polished with MetPrep3/PH-4™ polisher (Allied High-tech Products Inc., USA) to reduce the surface roughness Ra to be less than 5% of maximum indentation depth hmax. In the step by step grinding/polishing processes (Chinwoo Tech Co., Ltd., South Korea), 220 and 600 diamond grit sandpapers, 800 and 2400 grit SiC sandpapers, 3 μm diamond suspension and 0.05 μm final preparation solutions were used. Ra was measured with atomic force microscopy (AFM) (NX10, Park systems, South Korea) in the polished samples and an average Ra of 14 nm is obtained. We observe the polished surfaces using optical microscope and AFM. In addition, the flatness of the sample is confirmed based on the line image from AFM measurements. To determine the phase structure of the sample, X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements of as-cast alloys were obtained by using a RigaKu X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation. Measurements were taken with a scanning speed of 2°/min and a diffraction angle θ with a range of 10°–90°. The chemical composition of microstructure was analyzed by using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) inside the field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) apparatus (JSM-7100F, JEOL Ltd., Japan).

2.2Nanoindentation experiments and methods

The nanoindentation experiments were performed at room temperature using Ultra Nanoindentation Tester (UNHT3, Anton Paar, Switzerland) with a diamond Berkovich tip. UNHT3 is appropriate for performing nanoindentation test at low loads and depths with less thermal drift as it uses a top referencing for measuring the displacement data of the indenter. Based on dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) using a reference material i.e. Fused silica (FS) (National Physics Laboratory, UK), the tip area function is determined by adjusting a spline interpolation of Ac and hc, and an extremely low frame compliance of the indentation system is estimated as cf = 0.58 μm/N. A linear load P was applied with a constant loading rate dP/dt (during both loading and unloading cycles); to reduce the error from creep in nanoindentation [28], the maximum load Pmax was held for a hold period of 10 seconds before unload. The zero-contact point, where load and depth are zero, was identified with a stiffness threshold of 150 mN/mm and an initial contact load of 0.02 mN in each test. Around 15 indentations were performed for each test configuration to check the reproducibility of experimental load-depth (P-h) curves; mean load-depth curves were derived from more than five data sets with a high level of reproducibility.

To observe the effect of dP/dt and Pmax on the indentation response of Zr65Cu15Al10Ni10, standard indentation tests are performed with (i) different dP/dt, constant Pmax and (ii) various Pmax, constant dP/dt. Grid indentation technique was applied with 20 μm gap between each indent. Nanoindentation est parameters are listed in Table 1. Data acquisition frequency was varied between 5–10 Hz according to the loading rate. Residual imprints (indents) after load removal were observed with an optical microscope with a lens of 100× optical magnification, FE-SEM and AFM. In addition, to understand the effect of indention depth on evaluated mechanical properties, sinus mode and progressive multicyclic (PMC) mode indentations were also performed.

Table 1.

Nanoindentation test methods and parameters.

Parameters  Standard indentation modeSinus mode of indentation  PMC mode of indentation 
  Constant Pmax  Constant loading rate     
Maximum load (mN) loading rate (mN/s)  50  5, 10, 20, 30, 50, 80, 100  100  100 
  5, 10, 20, 40, 60, 100  40  –  40 
    Constant strain rate (s1)  0.05  – 
    Sinus frequency (Hz)  – 
    Maximum sinus amplitude (mN)  – 
      No of cycles  10 
      Load increment per cycle ΔP(mN)  10 
2.2.1Quasi-static indentation methods

In quasi-static indentation, the hardness and elastic modulus of Zr65Cu15Al10Ni10 in each test can be calculated by using the Oliver-Pharr (OP) method [6,13,17]. The indentation hardness H is here determined by

where Ac is the projected contact area at Pmax. For a perfect Berkovich tip, Ac can be determined from the contact depth hc and a tip geometry factor Co = 24.5, which was previously obtained from the best fit of indentation data [17]. Hence, Ac is expressed as
and the corresponding hc is calculated from the indentation load-depth (P-h) curves as
where hmax is maximum indentation depth. The sink-in depth hs is related to the geometric constant ε (=0.76 for Berkovich indenter tip), the initial unloading stiffness (slope) S and Pmax. The initial slope S can be determined from the elastic unloading curve as
Here, reduced modulus Er is expressed by the elastic moduli of the specimen E and of the indenter EI and the corresponding Poisson’s ratios v and vI

Accordingly, the elastic modulus of the specimen E can be determined by

2.2.2Sinus mode indentation methods

In sinus mode indentations, a small oscillated force that follows sine wave is added to the quasi-static force. With respect to time t, the force and displacement signals can be denoted as follows [29].

where Po and ho  are the force and displacement amplitudes, respectively and ω is the angular frequency. ϕ is the phase angle between excitation and response. The stiffness S can be determined as follows

Based on Eq. (9), S can be determined with increasing h. Therefore, the mechanical properties can be calculated at various h based on Eqs. (1) & (6), and then the variation of hardness and elastic modulus with increasing h can be plotted. Nanoindentation test parameters are listed in Table 1. The sinus mode indentation is performed under constant strain rate condition as defined below [30]

By maintaining constant P˙/P with pyramid shaped indenter, constant value for indentation strain rate can be achieved if a steady-state value of hardness is reached and h˙=0[30].

2.3Finite element modelling

Since the Berkovich nanoindentation can be modelled by replacing the Berkovich tip with an equivalent conical indenter [31], an axisymmetric two-dimensional (2D) finite element (FE) model is created, and detailed explanation on mesh refinement study can be found in Refs. [28,32,33]. The ideally sharp conical indenter with an angle (between indenter and sample surface) θ = 19.7° is modelled by using rigid surfaces in Abaqus/Standard [34] (Fig. 1). The FE model contains about 15,600 nodes and 15,300 elements 4-node continuum axisymmetric elements (CAX4). Axisymmetric boundary conditions (BCs) are applied to the nodes on the z-axis. On the other hand, the bottom nodes are fixed in the z-direction, while they are free to move in radial direction (r-direction). The rigid indenter is allowed to move only in the depth direction (z-direction). Surface-to-surface contact is defined between the indenter and the specimen, and Coulomb-type friction is assumed with coefficient of friction μ = 0.2 [11]. Nanoindentation simulations are performed with load control in the dynamic analysis. Cyclic indentation responses of BMG are also simulated with a maximum of 10 cycles as described in the experimental section.

Fig. 1.

FE model for nanoindentation simulations.

(0.42MB).

The mechanical behavior of Zr65Cu15Al10Ni10 is assumed to be isotropic. To consider its pressure dependent behavior of BMGs, a linear Drucker-Prager (DP) pressure-dependent model is applied to the FE model [12]; the dilatancy angle for the linear DP model is assumed to be zero. The mechanical properties (E, zero pressure yield strength σ o, and friction angle β ) of Zr65Cu15Al10Ni10 are obtained based on a trial and error method by matching FE load-depth curves with experimental curves.

3Results and discussion3.1Microstructural analysis of Zr65Cu15Al10Ni10

To confirm the designed chemical composition of Zr65Cu15Al10Ni10 (at. %) that provided by the vender, EDS spectrum of as received Zr-BMG specimen is analyzed. The comparison of SEM and EDS layered images of residual indents shows that the chemical elements are evenly distributed over the sample as shown in Fig. 2. The SEM-EDS results at different indented locations give an average global composition of Zr65 (71–75 wt.%), Cu15 (13–16 wt.%), Al10 (2.6–3.2 wt.%) and Ni10 (6.6–8.9 wt.%) with small chemical fluctuation in the sample. A small weight ratio of oxygen is also observed in the EDS analysis. Elemental analysis based on XRD usually provides only qualitative results; for quantitative analysis, ICP-MS (inductively coupled plasma-mass spectroscopy) method is recommended. Although there is small deviation in measured values due to chemical fluctuation, we emphasize that the nanomechanical properties of Zr-BMG are comparable to the chemical composition measured i.e. Zr65.9Cu15.8Al8.5Ni9.8 (at. %) in this work. Based on the XRD measurements, the amorphous structure of Zr-BMG is confirmed as reported in the previous studies on the alloys with similar chemical composition [6,22,35]. Huang et al. [36] analyzed the possible scenario of heterogenous microstructure and density fluctuations in various BMGs and reported a weaker microstructural inhomogeneity in similar Zr64.13Cu15.75Al10.12Ni10. Here, we assume that the effect of (even weaker) microstructural inhomogeneity on the measured nano-mechanical properties is insignificant.

Fig. 2.

Zr–Cu–Al–Ni alloy: comparison of SEM image with EDS layered image along with EDS spectrum.

(0.59MB).
3.2Nanoindentation load-depth curves

The nanoindentation load-depth (P-h) curves of Zr65Cu15Al10Ni10 are extensively investigated in this section. Degree of plastic flow i.e. serration flow of BMGs mainly depends on employed loading rates dP/dt[37]. By varying dP/dt as 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, 100 mN/s, Fig. 3a shows obtained P-h curves for Pmax = 50 mN. Formation of shear bands occurs around the indentation imprint (Fig. 3) as freely moved atoms accumulate at a certain region due to large free volume in amorphous BMG [13]. When the applied strain rate is smaller than the net-generation rate of free volumes in amorphous alloys, individual shear bands form along the sliding plane [2,38]. Consequently, serration flows, which can be compared with pop-in events in nanoindentation, are often observed with dP/dt smaller than 20 mN/s, whereas, higher loading rates suppress the serration flows (i.e. amplitude of the pop-in event gets smaller [20]) as shown in Fig. 3b as reported in previous studies [2,20,37]. The deformation mechanism in amorphous alloys can be explained by bridging between serration and plasticity [2]. Although, the serration flow is observed with different loading rates, P-h curves are likely to coincide especially in the loading part. It coincides because serration distances are small (around 5−10 nm). Hence, the loading part of the P-h curve is approximated using Kick’s law (P = Ch2 for sharp indenter) [39]; we obtain the coefficient C = 153 GPa by regressing the mean experimental P-h curve. Similarly, the numerical P-h curve is obtained by assigning the elastic behavior with E = 130 GPa, v = 0.367 [12], and plastic behavior with linear Drucker-Prager model parameters σ o = 2.7 GPa, and β = 14° [12]. The values of elastic (E) and plastic (σ o, β ) parameters are determined by obtaining a good match between unloading and loading curves of numerical and experimental data based on trial and error method. The error is reduced in a least square sense. Fig. 3a includes both Kick’s law approximation and the numerical P-h curve for Zr65Cu15Al10Ni10. In addition, SEM images of residual indent for each loading rate are compared in Fig. 3c. It is noted that the shear band formation is predominant with lowest loading rates. Therefore, further experiments with various peak and cyclic loads are conducted with a loading rate of 40 mN/s to reduce the effect from the serration flows.

Fig. 3.

Nanoindentation load-depth (P-h) curves of zirconium based bulk metallic glass (Zr-BMG) for different (a) loading rate dP/dt = 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, 100 mN/s. Loading curve is approximated based on both Kick’s law and FE method (b) observation of serration flow with slower dP/dt = 5 mN/s. (c) SEM images of residual indent at each loading rate.

(0.25MB).

We observed the effect of peak loads on the P-h curves varying Pmax = 5, 10, 20, 30, 50, 80, 100 mN. The mean loading curves for each load almost coincide with those approximated with Kick’s law; hence, it confirms a high-level of reproducibility of experimental curves as shown in Fig. 4a. Similarly, numerical simulations are performed with the material properties of Zr65Cu15Al10Ni10 and the numerical P-h curves almost reproduce the experimental results as shown in Fig. 4b. A comparison of residual indent for Pmax = 20, 50, 80, 100 mN (in Fig. 4c) confirms a gradual increase in indent size with the load. Surface damages due to the accumulation of shear bands, which control the compressive plasticity in BMGs [40], are observed at higher loads Pmax = 80, 100 mN. Similar damages are also observed during the cyclic indentation as discussed in the following section.

Fig. 4.

Nanoindentation load-depth (P-h) curves for different maximum indentation loads Pmax = 5, 10, 20, 30, 50, 80, 100 mN from (a) experiments and (b) FE analyses. Mean experimental curves are obtained from more than five experimental data at each Pmax and coincides of loading part confirms the reproducibility of experimental results.

(0.27MB).

A representative P-h curve of sinus mode indentation and the corresponding SEM image of residual imprint are presented in Fig. 5a and b. The test is performed with a constant strain rate of 0.05 s−1 up to Pmax = 100 mN. By continuously measuring the material stiffness S, the variation of hardness and elastic modulus are calculated with increasing indentation depth. Numerical simulation of sinus mode indentation is not performed in this work. Fig. 5c compares P-h curves between experiments (black line) and simulations (red line) of progressive multi-cyclic indention. A comparison of experimental P-h curves of enlarged views at lower and higher loads confirms that the size of serration steps increases with gradually increasing loads (or penetration depth); similar phenomenon was observed in prior nanoindentation studies on Zr-BMG [35,37,41]. The surface damages are observed in some tests for higher loads P ≥ 80 mN (cycles ≥ 8) as shown Fig. 5d.

Fig. 5.

Load-depth curve from (a) sinus mode nanoindentation (b) corresponding residual indent. (c) P- h curve from cyclic mode indentation. Experimental P-h curve (black line) is compared with those from FE analysis (red line). (d) Observed surface damages at higher loads P ≥ 80 mN (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article).

(0.44MB).
3.3Evaluation of nanomechanical properties3.3.1Elastic modulus

At each Pmax, the variation of unloading stiffness S with increasing contact depth hc at Pmax are plotted as shown in Fig. 6a, where hc is calculated based on OP method [Eq. (3)]. As like in Eq. (4), a linear relationship between Er, S and hc at Pmax can be obtained by replacing Ac with 24.5 hc. Consequently, Er can be obtained from the slope of best-fit line. Linear regression yields non-zero intercept, which is very close to origin. For better comparison, a linear regression line with zero intercept is also plotted. At smaller depths, effect of finite indenter-tip radius causes smaller deviations between the regression lines. However, a best-fit value of intercept = −0.013 mN/nm can be large enough to influence on the estimated elastic modulus at smaller depths [42]. It is suggested to introduce a correction offset (≈14 nm) with contact depth to consider the effect of indenter-tip radius. Using a linear regression with zero intercept, we calculate the load independent elastic modulus Eo from the slope of best-fit line as 144 GPa by assuming negligible tip radius effect on Eo1. In addition, E is measured at each Pmax based on the Eq. (6) as listed in Table 2. It should be emphasized that, for Pmax = 50 mN, the effect of loading rate on measured E values is negligible as the average value of E = 154 ± 5 GPa from the tests with a range of dP/dt is similar to those obtained with dP/dt = 40 mN/s and Pmax = 50 mN. The same can be applied to the cases with another Pmax, too. Regardless of the magnitude of Pmax, the numerical approximation gives rather smaller E = 130 GPa, which is based on the trial and error method of matching load-depth curves. This is further discussed in Section 3.4.

Fig. 6.

(a) Variation of initial unloading stiffness S with increasing contact depth hc at Pmax. hc is calculated based on OP method. At smaller depths, effect of finite indenter-tip radius can cause deviations from the data points. However, the deviation is very small. (b) Variation of elastic modulus with indentation depth.

(0.11MB).
Table 2.

Effect of peak load on experimental results (dP/dt = 40 mN/s).

Pmax (mN)  hmax (nm)  We/Wt  hc (nm)  S (mN/nm)  E (GPa)  H (GPa) 
173±3  0.36  142  0.126  137 ± 11  8.18 ± 0.2 
10  252±2  0.35  212  0.188  143 ± 7.4  7.84 ± 0.2 
20  357±3  0.33  302  0.280  153 ± 4.3  7.97 ± 0.2 
30  438±3  0.33  372  0.345  156 ± 3.4  8.08 ± 0.1 
50*  576±4  0.32  491  0.449  155 ± 3.1  7.88 ± 0.2 
80  733±8  0.33  625  0.570  155 ± 6.3  7.88 ± 0.2 
100  817±7  0.32  701  0.663  163 ± 3.5  7.88 ± 0.2 

Bold values highlight the size of the indentation to readily interpret ISE.

*

Effect of loading rate on measured values is negligible: E = 154 ± 5 GPa and H = 8.22 ± 0.2 GPa.

On the other hand, a strong indentation depth (or peak load) dependency of E is observed as listed in Table 2; in which, E increases with h. A converged constant value of elastic modulus is not obtained up to the maximum depth around 800 nm. Results from the sinus mode and progressive multi-cyclic mode indentations also support the results obtained with the single indentation mode as shown in Fig. 6b. It is interesting to note that the all three modes of indentation provide similar trends of indentation size effect (ISE) on elastic modulus; this can be attributed to the significant pile-up around the indent (Figs. 3 and 4). ISE in amorphous alloys may originate from the strain-induced softening due to the continuous creation and coalescence of excessive free volume upon indentation [43]. While, the other reason may be that the material properties calculated by the Oliver-Pharr method are significantly affected by the pile-up as the ratio of elastic and total energy We/Wt ≈ 0.33 (Table 2), which can be readily obtained from the indentation load-depth curve, for Zr-BMG is less than 0.5. We/Wt is closely related to the plasticity index i.e. a material with We/Wt = 1 tends to show elastic behavior, whereas the material with We/Wt ≈ 0 shows fully plastic regime [12]. Rodriguez et al. [12] stated that the OP method leads to very large errors in Ac estimations for very ductile materials (We/Wt< 0.5) and/or materials with low pressure sensitivity, while the OP method can be conventionally used to estimate Ac if We/Wt> 0.5. Since We/Wt for Zr-BMG is measured as 0.33, inaccurate determination of Ac by the OP method can introduce, significant error in calculated properties. This error can be rectified by including the pile-up effect, athrough AFM or microscopy measurements of the projected area of the residual imprint [12].

3.3.2Hardness

A polynomial relation can be obtained between the Pmax and hc in nanoindentation as follows [43].

where ao, a1, a2 are constants, and parameter a2 can be used to measure a load-independent hardness Ho[42,44,45]. Fig. 7a shows the experimental results of hc at various Pmax, and the polynomial regression is presented as a solid line with (ao, a1, a2) = (−0.454, 0.0105, 1.89 × 10 − 4). For Berkovich indenter, the load-independent hardness Ho = a2/24.5 is measured as 7.71 GPa for Zr65Cu15Al10Ni10. Unlike the elastic modulus, the hardness does not show any significant ISE (Fig. 7b, in which experimental results from all three indentation modes are compared). The hardness of Zr65Cu15Al10Ni10 is obtained as H = 7.88 GPa, which is close to Ho measured based on Fig. 7a. By contrast, FE results give a much larger hardness HFE = 8.23 GPa; this can be attributed to the substitution of the conical indentation for Berkovich indentation, especially when significant pile-up occurs. Kim et al. [32] showed that Ac from Berkovich indentation is larger than the conical indentation at equal indentation depths. In addition, the current FE model unable to simulate the surface damage due to the formation of the shear band around the indention.

Fig. 7.

(a) Plot of Pmaxvs. hc. Solid lines regress the data. (b) Variation of hardness with indentation depth. Hardness becomes depth-independent at larger indentation depth.

(0.1MB).
3.4Correction of evaluated properties

According to the Oliver-Pharr method, hardness H shows insignificant ISE and the value H = 7.88 GPa was obtained for Zr65Cu15Al10Ni10, whereas elastic modulus E shows significant ISE. Here E increases monotonically from 130 to 165 GPa with Pmax in the range of 5–100 mN (Table 2) due to the significant pile-up around the indentation. The observation of significant pile-up (the ratio of elastic and total energy We/Wt ≈ 0.33 < 0.5) thus questions the application of the Oliver-Pharr method to Zr-BMG. Huang et al. [18] also concluded that ISE in nanoindentation of BMG is attributed to the pile-up and suggested to account the effect of pile-up to the OP method. Therefore, the nanomechanical properties evaluated by the OP method are corrected with the AFM measured projected contact area of residual imprint Ares based on the assumption that Ares is equal to Ac at Pmax[14,46]. From 3D-mapping of the residual imprint for Pmax = 50 mN, we observe significant pile-up near the contact edges as shown in Fig. 8a. Therefore, the Sobel edge enhancement method with normalized parameters [12] is used to measure Ares from the AFM topology image (Fig. 8b). Profiles of residual imprints for different Pmax (=20, 50, 100 mN) are compared in Fig. 8c, in which the material pile-up is highlighted. By substituting Ares instead of Ac in Eq. (1) and Eq. (6), the nanomechanical properties are re-calculated for various Pmax as listed in Table 3. Although, the elastic modulus yet shows small ISE, we conclude that the nanomechanical properties of considered Zr65Cu15Al10Ni10 are around E = 125 ± 3 GPa, H = 6.60 GPa, and the DP model parameters σ o = 2.7 GPa, and β = 14°. These experimental values are comparable with the previously reported data [16,27]. However, the values of elastic modulus reported in this work is larger than that from conventional compression tests [22]; this is an example of the ‘smaller is the stronger’ pattern and so called ‘size effects’ [29,47]. To validate these properties, the experimental load-depth curve for Pmax = 50 mN is compared with those from FE analysis for evaluated nanomechanical properties as shown in Fig. 8d. A good match between numerical and experimental load-depth curves is obtained. It is again concluded that OP method tends to overestimate E and H of the material e.g. BMGs that shows significant pile-up. The results presented in this work based on AFM measurements provide further insight to understand the mechanical behaviors of similar BMGs. Accordingly, the effect of experimental uncertainties in material property evaluation also can be reduced for these materials.

Fig. 8.

AFM measurements of residual imprint: (a) 3D mapping, (b) edge detection by Laplacian techniques, (c) imprint profiles at different Pmax show distinct pile-up. (d) Comparison of experimental load-depth curve to those obtained from FE analysis for evaluated nano-mechanical properties of Zr65Cu15Al10Ni10.

(0.4MB).
Table 3.

Corrected experimental results by AFM measurements.

Pmax (mN)  Projected contact area (μm2)S (mN/nm)  E (GPa)H (GPa)
  OP  AFM    OP  AFM  OP  AFM 
20  2.51 ± 0.05  3.04  0.280  153 ± 4.3  124.0  7.97 ± 0.2  6.58 
50  6.35 ± 0.13  7.65  0.449  155 ± 3.1  125.0  7.88 ± 0.2  6.56 
100  12.70 ± 0.24  15.60  0.663  163 ± 3.5  129.0  7.88 ± 0.2  6.42 
4Summary and conclusion

Nanomechanical properties, including elastic modulus and hardness of zirconium based bulk metallic glass (Zr65Cu15Al10Ni10) were obtained by nanoindentation experiments and numerical simulations. Experi-mental results from three different nanoindentation modes, namely (i) standard single indentation with a linear loading rate, (ii) progressive multi-cyclic indentation and (iii) sinus mode indentation, were compared to analyze the indentation size effect (ISE) on measured properties. Numerical simulations with the linear Drucker-Prager (DP) model were also performed, and a good match between experimental and numerical load-depth curves were obtained. The effects of loading rates and peak loads on the nanomechanical properties were also investigated in detail. The occurrence of serration flows was observed depending on the employed loading rate. SEM images of residual indents for various modes of indentation and peak loads were compared. Finally, based on experimental and numerical studies, the nanomechanical properties of Zr65Cu15Al10Ni10 were evaluated as E = 125 ± 3 GPa, H = 6.60 GPa, and DP model parameters σ o = 2.7 GPa, and β = 14°.

As damage around the indentation imprint was observed for higher loads >80 mN, future work will be focused on identifying the causes of these damages, especially in the multi-cyclic indentation. It is expected to improve the understanding of (contact) fatigue and fracture properties of Zr65Cu15Al10Ni10. In addition, wear properties will be investigated based on nano-scratch tests.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgment

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2017R1A2B3009706).

References
[1]
M. Miller, P. Liaw.
Bulk metallic glasses: an overview.
[2]
Y. Zhang, J.P. Liu, S.Y. Chen, X. Xie, P.K. Liaw, K.A. Dahmen, et al.
Serration and noise behaviors in materials.
Prog Mater Sci, 90 (2017), pp. 358-460
[3]
W. Dandana, M.A. Yousfi, K. Hajlaoui, F. Gamaoun, A.R. Yavari.
Thermal stability and hydrogen-induced softening in Zr57Al10Cu15.4Ni12.6Nb5 metallic glass.
J Non Cryst Solids, 456 (2017), pp. 138-142
[4]
W. Dandana, K. Hajlaoui.
Effect of hydrogen addition on the mechanical properties of Zr-based metallic glass.
J Alloys Compd, 742 (2018), pp. 563-566
[5]
F. Dong, S. Lu, Y. Zhang, L. Luo, Y. Su, B. Wang, et al.
Effects of hydrogen on the nanomechanical properties of a bulk metallic glass during nanoindentation.
Int J Hydrogen Energy, 42 (2017), pp. 25436-25445
[6]
H. Huang, J. Zhang, C.H. Shek, J. Yan.
Effects of pre-compression deformation on nanoindentation response of Zr65Cu15Al10Ni10 bulk metallic glass.
J Alloys Compd, 674 (2016), pp. 223-228
[7]
M.C. Li, M.Q. Jiang, F. Jiang, L. He, J. Sun.
Testing effects on hardness of a Zr-based metallic glass under nanoindentation.
Scr Mater, 138 (2017), pp. 120-123
[8]
C. Wang, Q.P. Cao, X.D. Wang, D.X. Zhang, S.X. Qu, J.Z. Jiang.
Time-dependent shear transformation zone in thin film metallic glasses revealed by nanoindentation creep.
J Alloys Compd, 696 (2017), pp. 239-245
[9]
W. Pilarczyk.
Structure and properties of Zr-based bulk metallic glasses in As-cast state and after laser welding.
Materials (Basel), 11 (2018),
[10]
H. Guo, C.B. Jiang, B.J. Yang, J.Q. Wang.
On the fracture toughness of bulk metallic glasses under Berkovich nanoindentation.
J Non Cryst Solids, 481 (2018), pp. 321-328
[11]
V. Keryvin, R. Crosnier, R. Laniel, V.H. Hoang, J.C. Sanglebœuf.
Indentation and scratching mechanisms of a ZrCuAlNi bulk metallic glass.
J Phys D Appl Phys, 41 (2008),
[12]
M. Rodríguez, J.M. Molina-Aldareguía, C. González, J. Llorca.
Determination of the mechanical properties of amorphous materials through instrumented nanoindentation.
Acta Mater, 60 (2012), pp. 3953-3964
[13]
S. Vincent, B.S. Murty, M.J. Kramer, J. Bhatt.
Micro and nano indentation studies on Zr60Cu10Al15Ni15 bulk metallic glass.
Mater Des, 65 (2015), pp. 98-103
[14]
Y. Zhang, T. Shi, Z. Tang, G. Liao.
An improved method to estimate Young’s modulus of Zr-based BMGs accounting for pile-up during nanoindentation.
J Non Cryst Solids, 427 (2015), pp. 20-25
[15]
D. Lahiri, J. Karp, A.K. Keshri, C. Zhang, G.S. Dulikravich, L.J. Kecskes, et al.
Scratch induced deformation behavior of hafnium based bulk metallic glass at multiple load scales.
J Non Cryst Solids, 410 (2015), pp. 118-126
[16]
A.M. Hodge, T.G. Nieh.
Evaluating abrasive wear of amorphous alloys using nanoscratch technique.
Intermetallics, 12 (2004), pp. 741-748
[17]
W.C. Oliver, G.M. Pharr.
An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments.
J Mater Res, 7 (1992), pp. 1564-1583
[18]
Y. Huang, J. Shen, Y. Sun, J. Sun.
Indentation size effect of hardness of metallic glasses.
Mater Des, 31 (2010), pp. 1563-1566
[19]
Jang J. Il, B.G. Yoo, Y.J. Kim, J.H. Oh, I.C. Choi, H. Bei.
Indentation size effect in bulk metallic glass.
Scr Mater, 64 (2011), pp. 753-756
[20]
X.L. Bian, G. Wang, K.C. Chan, J.L. Ren, Y.L. Gao, Q.J. Zhai.
Shear avalanches in metallic glasses under nanoindentation: deformation units and rate dependent strain burst cut-off.
Appl Phys Lett, (2013), pp. 103
[21]
M. Huráková, K. Csach, A. Juríková, J. Miškuf, Š Demčák, V. Ocelík, et al.
Influence of loading rate on the mechanical performance of metallic glass.
J Non Cryst Solids, 470 (2017), pp. 160-167
[22]
F. Qiu, P. Shen, T. Liu, Q. Jiang.
Enhanced ductility in a Zr65Cu15Al10Ni10 bulk metallic glass by nanocrystallization during compression.
Mater Des, 36 (2012), pp. 168-171
[23]
P. Tao, Y. Yang, Z. Xie, Y. He.
Research on friction and wear behavior of a bulk metallic glass under different sliding velocity.
Mater Lett, 156 (2015), pp. 177-179
[24]
A. Inoue, T. Zhang, S. Ishihara, J. Saida, M. Matsushita.
Preparation and mechanical properties of nanoquasicrystalline base bulk alloys.
Scr Mater, 44 (2001), pp. 1615-1619
[25]
Y. Yokoyama, K. Fujita, A.R. Yavari, A. Inoue.
Malleable hypoeutectic Zr–Ni–Cu–Al bulk glassy alloys with tensile plastic elongation at room temperature.
Philos Mag Lett, 89 (2009), pp. 322-334
[26]
L. Huang, E.M. Fozo, T. Zhang, P.K. Liaw, W. He.
Antimicrobial behavior of Cu-bearing Zr-based bulk metallic glasses.
Mater Sci Eng C, 39 (2014), pp. 325-329
[27]
J.P. Chu, N. Bönninghoff, C.C. Yu, Y.K. Liu, G.H. Chiang.
Coating needles with metallic glass to overcome fracture toughness and trauma: analysis on porcine tissue and polyurethane rubber.
Thin Solid Films, 288 (2019),
[28]
M. Kim, K.P. Marimuthu, J.H. Lee, H. Lee.
Spherical indentation method to evaluate material properties of high-strength materials.
Int J Mech Sci, 106 (2016), pp. 117-127
[29]
A. Ruiz-Moreno, P. Hähner.
Indentation size effects of ferritic/martensitic steels: a comparative experimental and modelling study.
Mater Des, 145 (2018), pp. 168-180
[30]
B.N. Lucas, W.C. Oliver.
Indentation power-law creep of high-purity indium.
Metall Mater Trans A, 30 (1999), pp. 601-610
[31]
Z. Shi, X. Feng, K.C. Hwang, J. Xiao, Y. Huang.
The equivalent axisymmetric model for Berkovich indenters in power-law hardening materials.
Int J Plast, 26 (2010), pp. 141-148
[32]
M. Kim, J.H. Lee, F. Rickhey, H. Lee.
A dual triangular pyramidal indentation technique for material property evaluation.
[33]
J.H. Lee, T. Kim, H. Lee.
A study on robust indentation techniques to evaluate elastic-plastic properties of metals.
Int J Solids Struct, 47 (2010), pp. 647-664
[34]
Abaqus.
User’s manual-Version 2017.
Dassault Systems Simulia Corp., (2016),
[35]
W. Li, B. Wei, T. Zhang, L. Zhang, Y. Dong.
Mechanical behavior of Zr65Al10Ni10Cu15 and Zr52.5Al10 Ni10Cu15Be12.5 bulk metallic glasses.
Mater Trans, 46 (2005), pp. 2954-2958
[36]
B. Huang, T.P. Ge, G.L. Liu, J.H. Luan, Q.F. He, Q.X. Yuan, et al.
Density fluctuations with fractal order in metallic glasses detected by synchrotron X-ray nano-computed tomography.
Acta Mater, 155 (2018), pp. 69-79
[37]
C.A. Schuh, T.G. Nieh.
A nanoindentation study of serrated flow in bulk metallic glasses.
Acta Mater, 51 (2003), pp. 87-99
[38]
F. Spaepent.
A microscopic mechanism for steady state inhomogeneous flow in metallic glasses.
Acta Metall, 25 (1977), pp. 407-415
[39]
F. Rickhey, J.H. Lee, H. Lee.
A contact size-independent approach to the estimation of biaxial residual stresses by Knoop indentation.
Mater Des, 84 (2015), pp. 300-312
[40]
W.H. Jiang, G. Fan, F.X. Liu, G.Y. Wang, H. Choo, P.K. Liaw.
Spatiotemporally inhomogeneous plastic flow of a bulk-metallic glass.
Int J Plast, 24 (2008), pp. 1-16
[41]
L. Cheng, Z.M. Jiao, S.G. Ma, J.W. Qiao, Z.H. Wang.
Serrated flow behaviors of a Zr-based bulk metallic glass by nanoindentation.
J Appl Phys, 115 (2014), pp. 0-5
[42]
J. Gong, H. Miao, Z. Peng, L. Qi.
Effect of peak load on the determination of hardness and Young’s modulus of hot-pressed Si3N4 by nanoindentation.
Mater Sci Eng A, 354 (2003), pp. 140-145
[43]
R. Limbach, K. Kosiba, S. Pauly, U. Kühn, L. Wondraczek.
Serrated flow of CuZr-based bulk metallic glasses probed by nanoindentation: role of the activation barrier, size and distribution of shear transformation zones.
J Non Cryst Solids, 459 (2017), pp. 130-141
[44]
J. Gong, J. Wu, Z. Guan.
Examination of the indentation size effect in low-load vickers hardness testing of ceramics.
J Eur Ceram Soc, 19 (1999), pp. 2625-2631
[45]
J. Gong, H. Miao, Z. Zhao, Z. Guan.
Load-dependence of the measured hardness of Ti(C,N)-based cermets.
Mater Sci Eng A, 303 (2001), pp. 179-186
[46]
L. Charleux, V. Keryvin, M. Nivard, J.-P. Guin, J.-C. Sanglebœuf, Y. Yokoyama.
A method for measuring the contact area in instrumented indentation testing by tip scanning probe microscopy imaging.
Acta Mater, 70 (2014), pp. 249-258
[47]
K. Lee, K.P. Marimuthu, C.L. Kim, H. Lee.
Scratch-tip-size effect and change of friction coefficient in nano / micro scratch tests using XFEM.
Tribol Int, 120 (2018), pp. 398-410

For the linear regression with non-zero intercept, Eo is calculated as 148 GPa. The difference between the values of Eo with zero and non-zero intercept is less than 3% for considered bulk metallic glass; therefore, it is concluded that the effect of tip radius on Eo is negligible in this study.

Copyright © 2019. The Authors
Journal of Materials Research and Technology

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
Tools
Cookies policy
To improve our services and products, we use cookies (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here.