Journal Information
Vol. 9. Issue 1.
Pages 490-497 (January - February 2020)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
...
Vol. 9. Issue 1.
Pages 490-497 (January - February 2020)
Original Article
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.10.078
Open Access
Electrocoalescence of emulsions in raffinate from the solvent extraction phase under AC electrical fields
Visits
...
Julio Valenzuela-Elguetaa,
Corresponding author
jvalenzuela01@ucn.cl

Corresponding author.
, Manuel Cánovasb, Antonio Garcíab, Ramón Záratec
a Centro de Investigación Tecnológica del Agua en el Desierto-CEITSAZA, Universidad Católica del Norte, Antofagasta, Chile
b Metallurgical and Mining Department, Universidad Católica del Norte, Antofagasta, Chile
c Physics Department, Universidad Católica del Norte, Antofagasta, Chile
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (6)
Show moreShow less
Tables (6)
Table 1. Factors and levels used in the factorial design.
Table 2. Experimental matrix and response results.
Table 3. Regression coefficients for the TOC removal and actual power models.
Table 4. F test of quadratic response surface models for the TOC removal and actual power models.
Table 5. Significance test of regression coefficients of the TOC removal model (α=20%; n−p=1; tinv (α/2, n−p)=3708).
Table 6. Significance test of regression coefficients of the actual power model (α=20%; n−p=1; tinv(α/2,n−p)=3708).
Show moreShow less
Abstract

Raffinate is an aqueous acid phase with low copper content obtained in the solvent extraction phase (SX). This solution, which drags a significant amount of the organic phase that forms an oil-in-water (O/W) emulsion, is recycled back to the leaching phase as an irrigation solution. In addition, the formation of emulsions can cause operational problems in the leaching phase. To solve these problems, this work is aimed to employ electrocoalescence under AC electrical fields to enhance demulsification of the emulsions that formed. The main objectives of this work were to select the most appropriate electrode and conduct laboratory tests based on a 23 factorial design to determine the variables that have the most significant effect on electrocoalescence. The variables considered were distance, frequency and voltage, while TOC removal and actual power were the response variables. The distance between electrodes is the most important parameter affecting TOC removal. In relation to actual power, the voltage applied was more significant than the distance between electrodes, the frequency and the interactions among variables. The tests to determine the optimal type of electrode identified rectangular steel plate electrodes as providing the best results. The operational parameters: a voltage of 30V, a frequency of 400Hz and an electrode distance of 14cm showed the greatest efficiency. Considering these results, it is demonstrated that electrocoalescence enhances demulsification of O/W emulsions in raffinate from solvent extraction in copper processing.

Keywords:
O/W emulsions
Raffinate
Solvent extraction
Electrocoalescence
Factorial design
Electrode
Full Text
1Introduction

Chile is the world's largest copper producer. According to the Chilean Copper Commission, fine copper production in 2015 was over 5760kMT (29.9% of world production) [1]. Approximately 20% of the production is obtained by hydrometallurgical processing. After the heap leaching phase, an organic solution containing the extractant is employed in the solvent extraction phase (SX) to collect the copper from the PLS (pregnant leach solution, an acid solution rich in copper sulfate) [2]. Two phases are generated in solvent extraction: (i) a copper-bearing organic phase that is stripped of its copper in the next step and (ii) an aqueous acid phase, termed raffinate, with low copper content. Raffinate is recycled back to the leaching step of the hydrometallurgical process as irrigation solution [3].

Raffinate drags a significant amount of the organic phase, which forms an oil-in-water emulsion (O/W) [4], representing a loss of organic extractant. This is a high-cost solution, making it important to reduce drag-out losses. The formation of emulsions in raffinate not only represents a loss of organic extractant, but can also cause several operational problems in the leaching phase that adversely affect the efficiency of the global process, such as loss of porosity and permeability in the ore heap, irrigation system plugging and water loss [5].

An emulsion is a mixture of two liquids that are normally immiscible. The liquid being dispersed is in the dispersed phase, while the liquid in which it is dispersed is in the continuous phase. There are two types of emulsions: oil-in-water (O/W) and water-in-oil (W/O). Although emulsions are widely used in many industrial fields, such as explosives in mining, emulsion formation in solvent extraction is especially undesirable [6].

Given the composition of the feed solution, it can be understood that its behavior is closely related to the nature and colloidal characteristics of clay–silica systems in the operating conditions: low pH, ionic strength and high particle concentration [7]. Work done with this system, it is concluded that at a pH of approximately 3 the repulsive forces are reduced, promoting the aggregation and disintegration stabilization of the system [8,9]. Under these conditions, colloidal silica can overcome the repulsive erratic barrier effect between particles, joining and forming three-dimensional networks that capture traces of organic reagent generating organic entrainment in the refining, and, on the other hand, the generation of waste.

In this case, the formation of the emulsion is favored by the characteristics of the feed solution in the SX process, since it contains impurities such as silica and clays (mainly kaolinite), which bind to the processed mineral and creep with the flow of PLS from the leaching stack [10–12].

To reduce the formation of emulsions and, consequently reduce organic extractant loss, it is necessary to develop and evaluate efficient easily-implemented low-cost separation techniques. There are now heat-based chemical demulsification [13,14], physical [15,16], membrane filtration separation [17,18] and electrocoalescence methods. In general, the mentioned methods present technological and operational difficulties, which involve the incorporation of unit operations to the conventional hydrometallurgical train, or the addition of reagents whose effects on downstream processes are unknown. In the case of coalescence, is a natural phenomenon by which two or more bubbles or droplets merge during contact to form a single bubble or droplet. An electrical field can be applied to increase the separation phase (coalescence rate) in emulsions. This technique is known as electrocoalescence [19–22]. Application of an electrical field increases the size of the bubbles or droplets and thus enhances their settling velocity and reduces the separation time [23]. Compared to other techniques, electrocoalescence is one of the most energy efficient since its application reduces the use of heat and the amount of chemical demulsifiers, which makes it more environmentally friendly [24].

We therefore propose employing electrocoalescence to enhance demulsification of O/W emulsions in raffinate, as a little invasive technique, with the potential to be incorporated simply and circumstantially in the hydrometallurgycal process. The main goal of this work is to show the results of applying this technique with alternate current (AC) to raffinate from solvent extraction (SX). To do this, the most suitable type of electrode in terms of shape and material was determined, along with the impact, through scaled laboratory tests. Besides, laboratory tests based on a 23 factorial design were conducted to determine the most influential operational variables.

2Theory

The phenomenon of coalescence has been studied extensively theoretically and experimentally [25–30]. Publications have described several models to determine breakup and collision frequencies, the size distribution of bubbles and coalescence efficiency [31]. Coalescence is considered a complex phenomenon, since it involves interactions of bubbles not only with the continuous phase, but also among the bubbles themselves once they are brought together by the external flow or by bodily forces [32]. Given our limited understanding of this phenomenon, there are no accurate models in the literature that take into account all the mechanisms and the wide range of possible conditions [33]. However, it is well known that contact and collision is the most important condition for coalescence. Collisions among bubbles are usually caused by their relative velocities [34], which are due to a variety of mechanisms: turbulence fluctuation, viscous shear stress, capture in turbulent eddies, buoyancy and wake interactions [31].

Film drainage, as proposed by Shinnar and Church [35], is the most extended model for coalescence. The model divides coalescence into three stages: (1) a liquid film forms when two bubbles near each other due to overpressure, (2) the liquid film drains sequentially until reaching a critical thickness, and (3) the film ruptures, resulting in coalescence.

Electrocoalescence increases the size of bubbles, thus enhancing their settling velocity and reducing separation time. The main mechanism for bubble growth due to the application of an electrical field to an emulsion is dipole induction. Electrical fields are widely applied in the petroleum industry to demulsify W/O emulsions [36–38]. However, electrocoalescence in O/W emulsions has not been heavily studied. It is thought that demulsification of O/W emulsions under a low electrical field is mainly induced by electrophoresis of the bubbles toward the electrodes. However, the physical effect of a low electrical field on an emulsion is not clearly understood [6]. Alternate current (AC), direct current and pulsed DC electrical fields have been used to enhance coalescence. It has been demonstrated that the two fields act according to different mechanisms in separating phases [39]. The first works were carried out using DC fields, which appear to be more effective for coalescence due to the capacity to maintain continuously high electrical field force. Owe Berg et al. [40] experimentally found that coalescence efficiency is proportional to electrical field strength when it is low, while it is proportional to the square of the strength when electrical field strength is high. In addition, a level of critical field strength was determined above which two bubbles coalescence partially rather than fully. Applying a constant DC electrical field causes the bubbles to line up into chains in the direction of the electrical field. Mahtre et al. [41] noted that chain formation reduces electrocoalescence efficiency and can result in short-circuits caused by electrodes. Hamlin et al. [42] showed that complete coalescence patterns can involution to non-coalescence patterns by varying the strength of the DC electrical field. They also studied the effect on conductivity and demonstrated that the size of the daughter bubbles is independent of ionic conductivity.

Bailes and Lakai [43] employed pulsed DC electrical fields for first time to avoid the problems generated by using DC fields, and reported more efficient coalescence can be achieved than is possible with DC or AC fields. They demonstrated that chains are continuously disrupted in pulsed DC fields, thus increasing the collision rate between bubbles. Since this pioneering work, there have been several works using pulsed DC electrical fields [20–22,36,44–48]. The influence of electrical field parameters such as strength, frequency, amplitude and waveform has been investigated. Williams and Baileys [49] also stated that separation efficiency improves with increasing field strength, but if the field strength is too high it increases the probability that secondary bubbles form during coalescence [50,51]. Bailes and Dowling [52] showed that the coalescence rate depends on pulse amplitude, shape and frequency, and that all of these parameters have optimal values. The effects of frequency have been studied by Joos and Snaddon [53], Bailes [54] and Midtgard [55], among other authors. The influence of the field waveform has been studied by several authors [20,24,56].

3Experimental set-up and procedure

The emulsion comes from a raffinate tank as the result of solvent extraction in a copper mine. The O/W emulsion employed presented an initial TOC of 388mg/L. A batch cell system under the application of a constant voltage and variable frequency and vice versa generated by an alternate current source and applied through two electrodes. The experimental cell used in this work is shown in Fig. 1. The AC power source has an adjustable output voltage up to 1000V and a frequency resolution up to 1Hz. The power source is equipped with devices to measure voltage, current, frequency and frequency factor. The cell is made of acrylic to facilitate viewing coalescence. The volume of the cell is about 1000mL. Fig. 2 shows the cell set-up employed for the experimental tests.

Fig. 1.

Scheme of the experimental cell. 1: acrylic cell; 2: electrodes; 3: AC power source; 4: voltmeter; 5: ammeter.

(0.09MB).
Fig. 2.

Photograph showing the cell used before the experiments.

(0.12MB).

It is important to define the electrode type (material and shape) since an inert conducting material is necessary that does not affect the chemical properties of the emulsion. The electrodes employed for the experimental tests were made of graphite and stainless steel, and were in the form of cylindrical rods and plates. Several tests were conducted with varying voltage and frequency to determine the most appropriate electrode material and shape. Effectiveness was determined by comparing measurements of power, turbidity and total organic carbon (TOC). The electrodes were kept in constant separation.

A 23 full factorial design was carried out to determine the influence of the variables distance, frequency and voltage on electrocoalescence. Fig. 3 shows the factorial design. Total organic carbon (TOC), the amount of carbon found in an organic compound, and turbidity were measured for all tests to evaluate the efficiency of electrocoalescence. TOC can be considered as a non-specific indicator of water quality. Thus, it was selected as a useful method to determine the efficiency of the process. TOC measurement was performed according to standard method 5310. Turbidity measurement was performed according standard method 2130 [57].

Fig. 3.

Scheme of the full 23 factorial design.

(0.06MB).

The sampling procedure consisted of collecting small fractions of aqueous solution using a 10mL syringe. The extraction point was located between the two electrodes to ensure the representativeness of the sample.

4Results4.1Electrode selection

Three electrode types were tested: (i) cylindrical graphite rods, (ii) cylindrical stainless steel rods and (iii) rectangular stainless steel plates. The laboratory tests to select the most suitable electrode involved varying the frequency while maintaining the voltage constant at 20V, and varying the voltage while maintaining the frequency constant at 60Hz. The operational time was an hour for both tests and the electrodes were at a distance of 14cm from each other. The final result was obtained by comparing the results of actual power, turbidity and total organic carbon (TOC) among the three electrode types.

Fig. 4a shows the results related to actual power. Frequency increased from 50Hz up to 400Hz in 1h. As shown in the figure, an increase in frequency decreases actual power considerably. The rectangular stainless steel plate electrode provided the most significant reduction in actual power. Fig. 4b shows the results of actual power in function of voltage. Voltage ranged from 10V to 40V. With all three electrodes, the application of higher voltage increases actual power. The rectangular stainless steel plate electrode consumes more power because the area of the active electrical field is larger. A turning point appears for the three electrodes from which the power begins to decrease as voltage increases, especially with the steel plates. This phenomenon can be explained by impedance generated in the emulsion.

Fig. 4.

Actual power: (left) constant voltage of 20V and (right) constant frequency of 60Hz.

(0.18MB).

Fig. 5a shows the percentage of turbidity removal in function of frequency. The best result was provided by the steel plates, with 79.4% of turbidity removed. Fig. 5b shows the variation in the removal of turbidity. As noted above, the steel plate electrodes are more effective than the others. These results are attributed to coalescence between bubbles in the organic phase.

Fig. 5.

Turbidity removal: (left) constant voltage of 20V and (right) constant frequency of 60Hz.

(0.14MB).

TOC removal efficiency was measured for the three electrodes. Fig. 6a shows the effect on TOC removal of varying frequency. The highest of TOC removal at around 31% was with steel plate electrodes. Similar results were obtained by varying voltage instead of frequency (Fig. 6b). Based on these results, the stainless steel plate electrode is the most suitable configuration for further electrocoalescence tests.

Fig. 6.

TOC removal: (left) at a constant voltage of 20V, and (right) at a constant frequency of 60Hz.

(0.14MB).
4.2Factorial design

Laboratory tests based on a 23 factorial design were conducted to determine the influence of the factors and their interaction on the process. The variables chosen were: distance (X1), frequency (X2) and voltage (X3). Minimum and maximum levels for each factor (Table 1) were chosen according to data from previous experiments to select electrodes.

Table 1.

Factors and levels used in the factorial design.

Variables  Low (−)  High (+) 
X1: Distance (cm)  10  14 
X2: Frequency (Hz)  60  400 
X3: Voltage (V)  10  30 

The factorial design was evaluated using the percentage of TOC removal and actual power as response variables. Table 2 shows the experimental matrix and the response variables of the factorial design.

Table 2.

Experimental matrix and response results.

  Experimental matrixVariablesResponses
  X1  X2  X3  Distance (cm)  Frequency (Hz)  Voltage (V)  % TOC removal  Actual power (Wh) 
−  −  −  10  60  10  44.6 (y165.7 (j1
−  −  14  60  10  59.5 (y263.8 (j2
−  −  10  400  10  37.1 (y331.4 (j3
−  14  400  10  55.9 (y425.9 (j4
−  −  10  60  30  46.4 (y5221.7 (j5
−  14  60  30  52.8 (y6192.6 (j6
−  10  400  30  56.4 (y797.6 (j7
14  400  30  60.6 (y877.9 (j8
4.2.1Modeling of the effects

A lineal polynomial model was defined to fit the response through Eq. (1):

where y is the response expressed as TOC removal or actual power; X1, X2 and X3 represent distance, frequency and voltage, respectively. The subsets of regression coefficients (a10, a20, a30) and (a12, a13, a23) represent lineal and interaction effects of the model, respectively, and a00 is a constant coefficient. The values of the regression coefficients for the response variables are presented in Table 3.

Table 3.

Regression coefficients for the TOC removal and actual power models.

Coefficients  a00  a10  a20  a30  a12  a13  a23 
TOC removal  −10.62  5.513  −0.04507  1.483  6.25×10−4  −0.1444  2.125×10−3 
Actual power  −21.49  1.172  −9.265×10−3  10.96  2.132×10−3  −0.2588  −0.01225 
4.2.2Statistical validation of the models

The significance of the regression process can be evaluated by the ratio between the media of the square of regression (MSreg) and the media of the square of residuals (MSres) and by comparing these variation sources using the F test. The F test is the inverse of the Fisher distribution, Finv(α, p1, np), and must be less than the ratio MSreg/MSres to affirm that the model is well-adjusted with the data, with a probability of (1α) [58]. The results of the F test, shown in Table 4, indicate that the predicted and observed values for both models are not significantly different (models of TOC removal and actual power are well fitted to the data, with a probability of 81% and 95%, respectively).

Table 4.

F test of quadratic response surface models for the TOC removal and actual power models.

  MSreg  MSres  MSreg/MSres  Finv (α, p1, npR2 
TOC removal  78.00  4.651  −16.77  15.84 (α=19)  0.9404 
Actual power  6079  21.13  287.8  234.0 (α=5)  0.9965 

n=8 is the total number of observations and p=7 is the number of parameters of model.

The coefficient of determination R2 was calculated for each model. The R2 value is a measure of the model fitting. A value of 1 indicates a perfect prediction, so the closer the value is to 1, the better. In this case, the values for TOC removal and actual power were 0.94 and 0.997, respectively. This means that 6% and 0.3%, respectively, of the total response variation cannot be explained by the model [59]. Therefore, the fit between the model and the experimental results is very good for both, TOC removal and actual power.

4.2.3Test of the regression coefficients

The significance test of each regression coefficient can by evaluated by using the inverse function of the Student's distribution (tinv(α/2,n−p)). The value must be less than |t0| to affirm that the variable associated with the coefficient contributes significantly to the model [58]. The results for the response variables are shown in Tables 5 and 6.

Table 5.

Significance test of regression coefficients of the TOC removal model (α=20%; np=1; tinv (α/2, np)=3708).

Coefficient  Value  Variance  Statistical t0  Comments 
a00  −10.62  1.512×102  −0.864  The term containing the coefficient can be neglected 
a10  5.513  9.928×10−1  5.532  The variable associated contributes significantly to the model 
a20  −0.04507  8.248×10−4  −1.569  The term containing the coefficient can be neglected 
a30  1.483  2.258×10−1  3.120  The variable associated contributes significantly to the model 
a12  0.000625  5.029×10−6  0.279  The term containing the coefficient can be neglected 
a13  −0.1444  1.454×10−3  −3.787  The variable associated contributes significantly to the model 
a23  0.002125  2.012×10−7  4.738  The variable associated contributes significantly to the model 
Table 6.

Significance test of regression coefficients of the actual power model (α=20%; np=1; tinv(α/2,np)=3708).

Coefficient  Value  Variance  Statistical t0  Comments 
a00  −21.49  6.867×102  −0.820  The term containing the coefficient can be neglected 
a10  1.172  4.509  0.552  The term containing the coefficient can be neglected 
a20  −0.009265  3.746×10−3  −0.151  The term containing the coefficient can be neglected 
a30  10.96  1.025  10.824  The variable associated contributes significantly to the model 
a12  0.002132  2.284×10−5  0.446  The term containing the coefficient can be neglected 
a13  −0.2588  6.602×10−3  −3.185  The variable associated contributes significantly to the model 
a23  0.01225  9.137×10−7  −12.815  The variable associated contributes significantly to the model 

Table 5 shows the effects of the variables on the TOC removal. The variables with greater effect, arranged in decreasing order, are: X1 (distance), X23 (frequency×voltage), X13 (distance×voltage) and X3 (voltage). On the other hand, the maximum TOC removal value, within the studied range, was 61.4%. This value was obtained with the following parameters: distance 14cm, frequency 400Hz and voltage 30V.

As can be observed in Table 6, effects of the variables on the TOC removal, the variables with greater influence, in decreasing order, are: X23 (frequency×voltage), X3 (voltage) and X13 (distance×voltage). The minimum actual power, within the studied range, was 27.5Wh with the following parameters: distance 14cm, frequency 400Hz and voltage 10V.

5Conclusions

This work studies electrocoalescence of O/W emulsions in raffinate from the solvent extraction phase of copper extraction under alternate current. The work is divided into two parts: (i) selection of the most suitable electrode by comparing three types (cylindrical graphite rods, cylindrical stainless steel rods and rectangular stainless steel plates) and (ii) evaluation of the influence of three variables (distance between electrodes, frequency and voltage) on electrocoalescence efficiency through an experimental model with a 23 factorial design. The results of the first part indicate that the rectangular stainless steel plate performed best with respect to turbidity and TOC removal. In the second part, the percentage of TOC removal and actual power were chosen as response variables. The variables with more effect on electrocoalescence efficiency were separation between electrodes and the combination of applied voltage and frequency. The best results were obtained with a voltage of 30V, a frequency of 400Hz and a distance of 14cm between electrodes. This configuration provides an actual power of 77.9Wh and a TOC removal rate of 60.6%. To summarize, experiments based on a factorial design have shown that efficiency is improved by increasing distance between electrodes and the product of voltage and frequency. The results demonstrate that the application of alternate current electrical fields enhances demulsification of O/W emulsions and generates less contaminated aqueous solutions for reuse in leaching. There is a room for improvement as the evaluation of alternative methods to determine the efficiency, for example, through image processing. Besides, it is recommended to develop experiments on a larger scale to characterize the behavior of the system before implementing the technique on an industrial scale.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

Part of this work was funded by a CONICYT Fondecyt (Initiation Grant No. 11180329. Phenomenological aspects of electroosmotic drainage technique: application to copper leaching). The Authors thank to CEITSAZA -UCN (Technological Center for Research on Water in the Desert - Universidad Católica del Norte) for supporting this work.

References
[1]
H. de Solminihac, L.E. Gonzales, R. Cerda.
Copper mining productivity: lessons from Chile.
J Policy Model, 40 (2018), pp. 182-193
[2]
E. Domic.
Hidrometalurgia: Fundamentos, Procesos Y Aplicaciones.
Andros Impresos, (2001),
[3]
X. Liu, H. Li, Y. Liu, C. Su, W. Sand.
Impact of entrained and dissolved organic chemicals associated with copper solvent extraction on acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans.
Hydrometallurgy, 157 (2015), pp. 207-213
[4]
K.C. Sole, A.M. Feather, P.M. Cole.
Solvent extraction in southern Africa: an update of some recent hydrometallurgical developments.
Hydrometallurgy, 78 (2005), pp. 52-78
[5]
P. Navarro, S. Jara, J. Castillo.
Problemas en la separación de fases en extracción por solvente de cobre.
Revista Remetallica, (2014),
[6]
T. Ichikawa, Y. Nakajima.
Rapid demulsification of dense oil-in-water emulsion by low external electric field: I. Experimental evidence.
Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Aspects, 242 (2004), pp. 27-37
[7]
J. Valenzuela-Elgueta, Y.P. Jimenez, A.V. Delgado, S. Ahualli.
Electrokinetics and stability of silica/clay mixtures at high copper concentration. Implications in the mining of copper.
Miner Eng, 134 (2019), pp. 193-201
[8]
C. Chassagne, F. Mietta, J.C. Winterwerp.
Electrokinetic study of kaolinite suspensions.
J Colloid Interface Sci, 336 (2009), pp. 352-359
[9]
H. Jiang, X.I.E. Zhen, G.R. Liu, Y.W. Yu, D. Zhang.
Interaction forces between muscovite and silica surfaces in electrolyte solutions measured with AFM.
Trans Nonferr Metals Soc China, 23 (2013), pp. 1783-1788
[10]
G.M. Ritcey.
Crud in solvent extraction processing—a review of causes and treatment.
Hydrometallurgy, 5 (1980), pp. 97-107
[11]
A.M. Spasic, N.N. Djokovic, M.D. Babic, M.M. Marinko, G.N. Jovanovic.
Performance of demulsions: entrainment problems in solvent extraction.
Chem Eng Sci, 52 (1997), pp. 657-675
[12]
M.J. Virnig, S.M. Olafson, G.A. Kordosky, G.A. Wolfe.
Crud formation: field studies and fundamental studies.
Copper, (2007), pp. 26-29
[13]
S.L. Mason, K. May, S. Hartland.
Drop size and concentration profile determination in petroleum emulsion separation.
Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Aspects, 96 (1995), pp. 85-92
[14]
C.M. Chen, C.H. Lu, C.H. Chang, Y.M. Yang, J.R. Maa.
Influence of pH on the stability of oil-in-water emulsions stabilized by a splittable surfactant.
Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Aspects, 170 (2000), pp. 173-179
[15]
C.S. Fang, P.M.C. Lai, J. Microw.
Power Electromagn Energy, 30 (1995), pp. 46
[16]
J. Hempoonsert, B. Tansel, S. Laha.
Effect of temperature and pH on droplet aggregation and phase separation characteristics of flocs formed in oil–water emulsions after coagulation.
Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Aspects, 353 (2010), pp. 37-42
[17]
T. Mohammadi, M. Kazemimoghadam, M. Saadabadi.
Modeling of membrane fouling and flux decline in reverse osmosis during separation of oil in water emulsions.
Desalination, 157 (2003), pp. 369-375
[18]
B. Chakrabarty, A.K. Ghoshal, M.K. Purkait.
Effect of molecular weight of PEG on membrane morphology and transport properties.
J Membr Sci, 309 (2008), pp. 209-221
[19]
T.Y. Chen, R.A. Mohammed, A.I. Bailey, P.F. Luckham, S.E. Taylor.
Dewatering of crude oil emulsions 4. Emulsion resolution by the application of an electric field.
Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Aspects, 83 (1994), pp. 273-284
[20]
S.H. Mousavi, M. Ghadiri, M. Buckley.
Electro-coalescence of water drops in oils under pulsatile electric fields.
Chem Eng Sci, 120 (2014), pp. 130-142
[21]
V. Vivacqua, S. Mhatre, M. Ghadiri, A.M. Abdullah, A. Hassanpour, M.J. Al-Marri, et al.
Electrocoalescence of water drop trains in oil under constant and pulsatile electric fields.
Chem Eng Res Des, 104 (2015), pp. 658-668
[22]
B.B. Wang, X.D. Wang, T.H. Wang, G. Lu, W.M. Yan.
Electro-coalescence of two charged droplets under constant and pulsed DC electric fields.
Int J Heat Mass Trans, 98 (2016), pp. 10-16
[23]
J.S. Eow, M. Ghadiri, A.O. Sharif, T.J. Williams.
Electrostatic enhancement of coalescence of water droplets in oil: a review of the current understanding.
Chem Eng J, 84 (2001), pp. 173-192
[24]
C. Lesaint, W.R. Glomm, L.E. Lundgaard, J. Sjöblom.
Dehydration efficiency of AC electrical fields on water-in-model-oil emulsions.
Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Aspects, 352 (2009), pp. 63-69
[25]
W.J. Howarth.
Coalescence of drops in a turbulent flow field.
Chem Eng Sci, 19 (1964), pp. 33-38
[26]
R. Kuboi, I. Komasawa, T. Otake.
Collision and coalescence of dispersed drops in turbulent liquid flow.
J Chem Eng Japan, 5 (1972), pp. 423-424
[27]
A.K. Chesters, G. Hofman.
Bubble coalescence in pure liquids.
Mechanics and physics of bubbles in liquids, Springer, (1982), pp. 353-361
[28]
D. Colella, D. Vinci, R. Bagatin, M. Masi, E.A. Bakr.
A study on coalescence and breakage mechanisms in three different bubble columns.
Chem Eng Sci, 54 (1999), pp. 4767-4777
[29]
A. Hasseine, A.H. Meniai, M.B. LeHocine, H.J. Bart.
Assessment of drop coalescence and breakup for stirred extraction columns.
Chem Eng Technol, 28 (2005), pp. 552-560
[30]
I. Akartuna, D.M. Aubrecht, T.E. Kodger, D.A. Weitz.
Chemically induced coalescence in droplet-based microfluidics.
Lab Chip, 15 (2015), pp. 1140-1144
[31]
Y. Liao, D. Lucas.
A literature review on mechanisms and models for the coalescence process of fluid particles.
Chem Eng Sci, 65 (2010), pp. 2851-2864
[32]
G.H. Yeoh, C.P. Cheung, J. Tu.
Multiphase flow analysis using population balance modeling: bubbles, drops and particles.
Butterworth-Heinemann, (2013),
[33]
H.A. Jakobsen, H. Lindborg, C.A. Dorao.
Modeling of bubble column reactors: progress and limitations.
Ind Eng Chem Res, 44 (2005), pp. 5107-5151
[34]
X. Guo, Q. Zhou, J. Li, C. Chen.
Implementation of an improved bubble breakup model for TFM-PBM simulations of gas–liquid flows in bubble columns.
Chem Eng Sci, 152 (2016), pp. 255-266
[35]
R. Shinnar, J.M. Church.
Statistical theories of turbulence in predicting particle size in agitated dispersions.
Ind Eng Chem, 52 (1960), pp. 253-256
[36]
J.S. Eow, M. Ghadiri.
Electrostatic enhancement of coalescence of water droplets in oil: a review of the technology.
Chem Eng J, 85 (2002), pp. 357-368
[37]
T. Frising, C. Noïk, C. Dalmazzone.
The liquid/liquid sedimentation process: from droplet coalescence to technologically enhanced water/oil emulsion gravity separators: a review.
J Dispersion Sci Technol, 27 (2006), pp. 1035-1057
[38]
S. Less, R. Vilagines.
The electrocoalescers: technology: Advances, strengths and limitations for crude oil separation.
J Petrol Sci Eng, 81 (2012), pp. 57-63
[39]
S.E. Taylor.
Theory and practice of electrically-enhanced phase-separation of water-in-oil emulsions.
Chem Eng Res Des, 74 (1996), pp. 526-540
[40]
T.G. Owe Berg, G.C. Fernish, T.A. Gaukler.
The mechanism of coalescence of liquid drops.
J Atmos Sci, 20 (1963), pp. 153-158
[41]
S. Mhatre, V. Vivacqua, M. Ghadiri, A.M. Abdullah, M.J. Al-Marri, A. Hassanpour, et al.
Electrostatic phase separation: a review.
Chem Eng Res Des, 96 (2015), pp. 177-195
[42]
B.S. Hamlin, J.C. Creasey, W.D. Ristenpart.
Electrically tunable partial coalescence of oppositely charged drops.
Phys Rev Lett, 109 (2012), pp. 094501
[43]
P.J. Bailes, S.K.L. Larkai.
Experimental investigation into the use of high voltage DC. Fields for liquid phase separation.
Trans IChemE, 59 (1981), pp. 229-237
[44]
P.J. Bailes.
Electrically augmented settlers and coalescers for solvent extraction.
Hydrometallurgy, 30 (1992), pp. 417-430
[45]
M. Zagnoni, G. Le Lain, J.M. Cooper.
Electrocoalescence mechanisms of microdroplets using localized electric fields in microfluidic channels.
Langmuir, 26 (2010), pp. 14443-14449
[46]
Y. Zhang, Y. Liu, R. Ji, F. Wang, B. Cai, H. Li.
Application of variable frequency technique on electrical dehydration of water-in-oil emulsion.
Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Aspects, 386 (2011), pp. 185-190
[47]
Y. Zhang, Y. Liu, R. Ji, B. Cai, H. Li, F. Wang.
Dehydration efficiency of water-in-model oil emulsions in high frequency pulsed dc electrical field: effect of physical and chemical properties of the emulsions.
J Dispersion Sci Technol, 33 (2012), pp. 1574-1581
[48]
Y. Peng, T. Liu, H. Gong, J. Wang, X. Zhang.
Effect of pulsed electric field with variable frequency on coalescence of drops in oil.
RSC Adv, 5 (2015), pp. 31318-31323
[49]
T.J. Williams, A.G. Bailey.
Changes in the size distribution of a water-in-oil emulsion due to electric field induced coalescence.
IEEE Trans Ind Appl, IA-22 (1986), pp. 536-541
[50]
M. Mousavichoubeh, M. Ghadiri, M. Shariaty-Niassar.
Electro-coalescence of an aqueous droplet at an oil–water interface.
Chem Eng Process, 50 (2011), pp. 338-344
[51]
M. Mousavichoubeh, M. Shariaty-Niassar, M. Ghadiri.
The effect of interfacial tension on secondary drop formation in electro-coalescence of water droplets in oil.
Chem Eng Sci, 66 (2011), pp. 5330-5337
[52]
P.J. Bailes, P.D. Dowling.
The production of pulsed EHT voltages for electrostatic coalescence.
J Electrost, 17 (1985), pp. 321-328
[53]
F.M. Joos, R.W.L. Snaddon.
On the frequency dependence of electrically enhanced emulsion separation.
Chem Eng Res Des, 63 (1985), pp. 305-311
[54]
P.J. Bailes.
An electrical model for coalescers that employ pulsed DC fields.
Chem Eng Res Des, 73 (1995), pp. 559-566
[55]
O.M. Midtgård.
Electrostatic field theory and circuit analysis in the design of coalescers with pulsed dc voltage.
Chem Eng J, 151 (2009), pp. 168-175
[56]
L.E. Lundgaard, G. Berg, A. Pedersen, P.J. Nilsen.
Electrocoalescence of water drop pairs in oil.
Dielectric Liquids, 2002 (ICDL 2002). Proceedings of 2002 IEEE 14th International Conference on Dielectric Liquids,
[57]
APHA, AWWA, WEF (American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Pollution Control Federation, & Water Environment Federation).
Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater.
21st ed., APHA, (2005),
[58]
D.C. Montgomery.
Design and analysis of experiments.
3rd ed., John Wiley and Sons, (1991),
[59]
G.E. Box, N.R. Draper.
Empirical model-building and response surfaces.
John Wiley and Sons, (1987),
Copyright © 2019. The Authors
Journal of Materials Research and Technology

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
Tools
Cookies policy
To improve our services and products, we use cookies (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here.