Journal Information
Vol. 9. Issue 2.
Pages 2477-2486 (March - April 2020)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
...
Vol. 9. Issue 2.
Pages 2477-2486 (March - April 2020)
Original Article
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.12.078
Open Access
Effect of ultrasonication duration of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) gel on characterizations of PVA film
Visits
...
Hairul Abrala,
Corresponding author
abral@ft.unand.ac.id

Corresponding author.
, Arief Atmajayaa, Melbi Mahardikaa, Fadli Hafizulhaqa, Kadriadia, Dian Handayanib, S.M. Sapuanc, R.A. Ilyasc
a Laboratory of Biocomposites, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Andalas University, Padang 25163, Indonesia
b Laboratory of Sumatran Biota, Faculty of Pharmacy, Andalas University, Padang 25163, Indonesia
c Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (8)
Show moreShow less
Tables (1)
Table 1. The crystallinity index (CI) of the film calculated from XRD curve (Fig. 5), Opacity value (Fig. 3), Transmittance (T) ratio 1141/1095 cm−1 from FTIR curve (Fig. 4b), and viscosity value.
Abstract

Many works reported a PVA based film prepared using ultrasonication, however, information on the effect of this treatment on changes of PVA’s properties is still limited. The main objective of this work was to study the effect of ultrasonication duration on the properties of PVA film. The PVA gel was sonicated using a 360 W ultrasonic probe for 2.5, 5, 7.5 and 10 min. Ultrasonication duration for 7.5 min results in a significant effect (p ≤ 0.05) on an increase in tensile strength, but not on tensile modulus and strain at the break of the film. After this vibration duration, tensile strength increased by almost 29 %, strain at break decreased by 30 %, opacity decreased by 22 %, and water vapor permeability decreased by 11 %. On the other hand, moisture resistance decreased significantly (almost 12 %). The sonicated film underwent larger lattice strain and had higher crystal structure compared to non-sonicated film. This work informs that ultrasonication on PVA gel is a potential method to fulfil some properties of PVA film for food packaging material.

Keywords:
Ultrasonication
Gelatinization
PVA
Residual stress
Lattice strain
Full Text
1Introduction

Poly-vinyl alcohol (PVA) is an attractive material for bioplastics due to its water-solubility and biodegradability [1,2]. PVA is a common bioplastic with excellent characterizations including high oil and chemical resistance, and stable in almost all organic solvents. Also, PVA is suitable for paper adhesive material, and packaging application [3]. However, this material has high moisture absorption due to the presence of many hydroxyl groups [3]. Attempt to reduce this weakness is the mixing PVA with filler more hydrophobic than PVA. Last studies have reported that PVA based composite displays decreased moisture absorption after adding pineapple leaf fiber [4], and bacterial cellulose nanofiber [5] to pure PVA. Moreover, better homogeneity of this filler in PVA matrix leads to improve the moisture resistance of the composites [6]. This result can be obtained using ultrasonication method. Ultrasonic equipment uses sound energy to create acoustic capitation of air bubbles in a gelatinized PVA [7]. On collapsing, the bubbles produce microjets and shock waves, which can disperse filler in the PVA matrix [8,9]. Many researchers have introduced better dispersion of the filler in PVA based composite film prepared via ultrasonication, however, their findings did not characterize the mechanical and physical properties of pure PVA film [5,10,11]. According to last studies, the ultrasonication disrupted the polymer structure in the starch leading to change in its characterization including tensile, and thermal properties [12–15]. Although many studies have reported the use of ultrasonication for preparation of PVA based film, however, no comprehensive information was given regarding the changes in the structure and characterizations of the pure PVA after ultrasonication [3,6,10,16]. Therefore, it becomes more important to know how much effect of the ultrasonic treatment on changes in neat PVA properties. This study addresses this lack by measuring the effect of ultrasonication of the PVA gel on is to further study the properties of the PVA film resulting from ultrasonication of the PVA gel on opacity, TGA/DTG, DSC, XRD, FTIR, tensile properties, water vapor permeability, and moisture absorption. Also, SEM photographs are carried out to observe the fracture surface of tensile samples.

2Materials and methods2.1Materials

PVA (type 2488, degree of polymerization 2400, and the minimum degree of alcoholization 86 %) was purchased from products Jiangxi Jiang Wei Hi-Tech Co. Ltd (China). PVA was vacuum-dried at 50 °C for 24 h before use.

2.2Preparation of PVA films and viscosity measurement

10 g PVA powder was dissolved in 100 g distilled water using a hot plate magnetic stirrer (Scilogex MS-H280-Pro) at 80 °C and 500 rpm for 2 h until gelatinized. The PVA gel was treated ultrasonically at 360 W for 2.5, 5, 7.5 and 10 min using an SJIA 1200 W ultrasonic probe (20 mm diameter) dipped it in the gel for 10 mm. Part of the non- and sonicated PVA gel was separated to measure its viscosity using a NDJ-8S Digital Rotary Viscometer at 60 rpm for 12 s. Another portion of this gel was poured onto a petri dish (145 mm diameter) that was dried in a vacuum drying oven (DZF-6000 Vacuum Dryer) at 50 °C for 20 h. Each PVA film is labelled with ultrasonic duration. For example, PVA-0 and PVA-2.5 are a film without and with sonication for 2.5 min.

2.3Characterization2.3.1Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

The fracture surface of films from tensile samples was observed with a Hitachi 3400 N series SEM with an accelerating current of 10 kV and probe current of 8 mA to optimize observation of the surface morphology of the sample. The sheet was coated with carbon followed by gold for 60 s.

2.3.2Opacity of film

A spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV 1800, Japan) was used for determining the opacity of the film. All films were cut into 10 cm × 25 mm rectangles and placed in a spectrophotometer. ASTM D 1003-00 [Standard test method for haze and luminous transmittance of transparent plastics] was used as a testing standard. The area under the absorbance spectrum between 400 nm and 800 nm was determined as the opacity value of films. The process was repeated three times for each film.

2.3.3Fourier transform infrared (FTIR)

An FTIR spectrometer (Frontier, Perkin Elmer, USA) was used to characterize FTIR spectra of films. The scanning was performed within the wavenumber range of 4000−600 cm−1 with 4 cm-1 resolution.

2.3.4X-ray diffraction (XRD)

X-ray diffraction patterns of PVA films were recorded using a PANalytical Xpert Pro diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation at 40 kV and 30 mA. Samples were scanned between 2θ = 10° to 100°. The crystallinity index (CI) percentage was measured using Eq. 1:

where IT is the intensity of the main peak at about 19.5° and 40.8° of a lattice plane, and IA is the lowest intensity at either side of a crystallinity peak as shown simply in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Schematic description of the crystallinity index estimation.

(0.07MB).
2.3.5Thermogravimetric (TG) and Differential Thermogravimetric (DTG) analyzing, and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)

This method is similar to the one reported in more detail in a previous study [17]. The thermal properties of the samples including TGA and DTG were measured using a DTG-60 instrument, Shimadzu (Japan), from room temperature up to 575 °C. The heating rate was 20 °C/min with 50 mL/min nitrogen flow. DSC of all studied samples was carried out using TA Instrument (Model Q20) from room temperature up to 450 °C at 10 °C/min with nitrogen flow rate of 50 mL/min. The weight of each sample was 5–10 mg.

2.3.6Tensile test

The procedure for tensile testing was similar to a previous study [18]. Tensile testing was performed using a Com-Ten testing machine 95 T with tensile speed for 3 mm/min at room temperature to measure tensile strength (TS), tensile modulus (TM) and elongation at break (EB). The films were cut into 10 cm × 1.5 cm rectangles according to the ASTM D882-12 standard [19]. Before the test, samples were conditioned for 48 h under 50 ± 5 % relative humidity at 25 °C. Tensile tests were repeated five times for each sample.

2.3.7Moisture Absorption and water vapor permeability

Moisture absorption (MA) was measured in a similar way to that in a previous study [20]. PVA films were cut into 1 cm × 1.5 cm rectangular pieces and dried in a ventilated oven (Universal Oven Memmert UN-55) until constant weight. Saturated NaCl solution was placed in a closed chamber to obtain 75 % relative humidity (RH). The dried samples were placed in the closed chamber at 25 °C for 8 h and weighed using a precision balance to the nearest 0.1 mg (Kenko) every 30 min. Moisture absorption was calculated using Eq. 2:

where w0 is initial weight and wt is final weight of the sample.

Water vapor permeability (WVP) method was similar to the method described by previous work with modifications [21]. PVA film was cut to 4.5 cm diameter and conditioned in desiccators at RH 50 ± 5 % and 24.5 °C for 1 week. Film samples were placed over the top of a plastic bottle (diameter 4.5 cm) filled with 50 mL of distilled water (RH 100 %). To prevent leakage of the moisture around the edge of the sample, the edges of the sample were sealed to the top of the bottle with a tight-fitting plastic lid with the centre removed. All samples were placed in desiccators with 1000 g silica gel (RH 12 %) at room temperature. The samples were weighed every 3 h over 24 h. WVP was calculated by following Eq. 3.

where dW = weight loss of the test cell (g), L = thickness of film (m), A = exposed area (m2), dt = time (s) under partial water vapor gradient (dP =2533 Pa). WVP determination was repeated 3 times for each film.

2.3.8Statistical analysis

IBM SPSS Statistics 25.0 (IBM Corporation, Chicago, USA) was used for analyzing the experimental data. The effect of various ultrasonication treatments on properties of the films was identified using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and P-test. Detection of differences amongst the mean values of the film properties was based on Tukey’s multiple range test using a 95 % confidence level (p ≤ 0.05). The measurements were replicated at least three times for each sample tested.

3Results and discussion3.1SEM morphology

SEM morphology of fracture surface from the tensile testing sample of non-sonicated and sonicated PVA film is displayed in Fig. 2. PVA-0 has smoother fracture surface (Fig. 2a) than 2.5 min sonicated PVA (Fig. 2b). This is because a relatively unobstructed crack propagation passing through PVA-0 film is present. As PVA gel was sonicated the polymer structure became more compact [15]. Consequently, this result leads to crooked cracks through the weaker parts of the film. This longer tortuous path of the crack due to the more compact polymer structure yields beach marks (marked with the red arrow in Fig. 2c, d) on the fracture surface. This result is in agreement with a previous study showing more fractions of these beach marks on the surface of PVA based film after addition of nanocellulose [22].

Fig. 2.

SEM morphology of fracture surface for (a) PVA-0, (b) PVA-2.5, (c) PVA-5, (d) PVA-7.5 and (e) PVA-10 film.

(0.58MB).
3.2Viscosity of PVA gel

The viscosity of PVA gel after ultrasonication is lower than that before ultrasonication as shown in Table 1. A significant drop of the viscosity is present after 5 min ultrasonication. In this case, each step of this sonicated treatment for 2.5, and 5 min drops a significant viscosity (p < 0.05) for 39, 51 % respectively. Further sonicated treatment decreased in slight viscosity. The decrease in this viscosity is because due to depolymerisation and decreased the molecular weight of PVA chains [23]. The shorter PVA chains are free more mobile that can restructure their chains themselves during the drying process, so resulting in more compact and homogenous polymer structure after ultrasonication [21]. The depolymerized PVA chains due to ultrasonication also have a higher amount of free hydroxyl groups [24]. A similar finding was also reported by last works that viscosity of PVA decreased after ultrasonication [25].

Table 1.

The crystallinity index (CI) of the film calculated from XRD curve (Fig. 5), Opacity value (Fig. 3), Transmittance (T) ratio 1141/1095 cm−1 from FTIR curve (Fig. 4b), and viscosity value.

SampleCI (%) at 2θOpacity (AUnm)aT ratio of 1141/1095 (%)Viscosity (mPa.s)a
19.5°  42° 
PVA-0  61.4  26.7  22.36±0.0c  15.8  413.4±7.2d 
PVA-2.5  60.7  28.7  21.73±0.0b  22.6  253.9±7.5c 
PVA-5  64.3  27.1  26.09±0.0e  24.3  201.9±8.1b 
PVA-7.5  62.0  29.6  17.44±0.0a  23.3  191.7±3.2a 
PVA-10  63.2  27.1  22.87±0.0d  23.7  185.3±4.3a 
a

Different subscripts a,b,c,d,e in the same column indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05.

3.3Opacity of the film

Fig. 3 displays opacity for the non-sonicated and sonicated film. Each film had various opacity value with various ultrasonic durations (Table 1). Ultrasonication results in decreases and increases in the opacity which can be attributed to the various refractive indexes of the film resulting from varied crystal orientation [26]. 5 min ultrasonication of PVA gel led to the lowest PVA transparency. The lowest opacity (17.44 AUnm) was obtained on PVA-7.5 with 22 % lower than PVA-0. This is attributable to the fraction of the crystals for PVA-7.5 was higher than in PVA-0 and the crystalline segments probably better aligned with respect to each other in comparison to PVA-0. The more aligned crystalline parts made the light easier to pass through thus the increase in the transparency of the film [27]. Sonication may result in a polycrystalline structure consisting of many crystalline segments that are randomly oriented in each other. The increasing number of crystalline segments will obstruct light passing through the film by scattering and reflections at the crystal boundaries, resulting in a reduction in transparency.

Fig. 3.

The opacity of films before and after ultrasonication.

(0.13MB).
3.4FTIR curves

Fig. 4 displays FTIR functional groups of the non-sonicated and sonicated films. All samples show a similar pattern. Ultrasonication did not cause the appearance of new functional groups but changed to peak position and intensity of PVA functional groups. Bands at about 3300, 2926, 1721, 1373, 1252, 1082, 838 cm−1 correspond to OH stretching, CH stretching, CO bonds, the CH bending, the OH in-plane bending, CO stretching vibrations, deformation vibrations of CH bonds respectively [4,28,29]. All the peak intensity of these bands after ultrasonication became stronger (lower (transmittance (T) value)). The most significant increase was measured on the 2.5 min sonicated film. The T value at the peak of the OH stretching for PVA-0 was 6.58 % shifted to 3.70 % in this time (Fig. 4a). This 30 % lower value for T corresponds to more hydrophilic film as a result of an increase in the number of hydroxyl groups [30,31]. This is in agreement with the highest moisture absorption of the PVA-2.5 as shown in Fig. 8a. The shorter chains after ultrasonication have more free hydroxyl groups than the long chains before de-polymerization hence the increase in the intensity of OH stretching. For further ultrasonic treatments, the vibration intensity of all functional groups became weaker. The T value of OH stretching for PVA-7.5 was 19.5 % higher than for PVA-2.5 (3.7 %) resulting from decreasing the number of free hydroxyl groups after the interconnection of the polymer chains via the hydrogen bonds [5,24]. This bonding was observed on a shift of the peak position from 3295 (PVA-2.5) to 3302 cm−1 (PVA-7.5) [17,32]. This is consistent with PVA-7.5 being less moisture absorbent than PVA-2.5 (Fig. 8a) and PVA-7.5 which has a higher crystallinity index than PVA-2.5 (Table 1). The change in the crystalline structure of the PVA after various ultrasonic treatments can be also observed from the transmittance ratio of peaks at 1141/1095 which corresponds to the ratio between the crystalline and amorphous fraction in PVA [5]. Obvious shifts in both these transmittance peaks can be seen in Fig. 4b which shows the change in the FTIR pattern for various durations of ultrasonication. The crystalline/amorphous ratio increased by 43 % in the first 2.5 min of ultrasonication (Table 1). But, further sonication caused much smaller increases in the crystalline fraction: the ratio shifted 3 % from 22.6 % (PVA-2.5) to 23.3 % (PVA-7.5). This is in agreement with the result in Fig. 5.

Fig. 4.

FTIR curves in a range of 4000 – 500 cm−1 (a), in range of 1200 – 900 cm−1 (b) for non-sonicated and sonicated film.

(0.36MB).
Fig. 5.

XRD patterns of the non-sonicated and sonicated film.

(0.35MB).
3.5XRD pattern

Fig. 5 shows X-ray diffraction patterns without and with ultrasonic treatments. All samples show a similar pattern. The main peak of the non-sonicated film was observed at 2θ = 19.5° corresponding to the (101) crystal plane which infers its semi-crystalline nature [33]. This is characteristic of pure PVA [5,32]. The minor peak appeared at 40.8° pertaining to (111) crystal plane [34,35]. The less intent peak was present at 23.1° which corresponds to (200) lattice planes [36]. After ultrasonication, the PVA film shows the higher crystalline structure. The crystallinity index (CI) for PVA-0 was 26.7 % which increased to 29.6 % for PVA-7.5 as a result of the intermolecular hydrogen bonding between polymers resulting in a more orderly and tightly packed structure. This result is consistent with T 1141/1095 ratio in the FTIR curve showing higher T ratio in the 7.5 sonicated film (23.3 %) than that in the non-sonicated film (15.8 %). Ultrasonication treatment caused the deformation of the (101) lattice plane as shown by shifting the peak position (see inset) from 2θ = 19.5° (PVA-0) to 2θ = 19.7° (PVA-7.5) [37]. This phenomenon was also observed on the (111) lattice plane with peak position which shifts from 2θ = 40.5° (PVA-0) to 40.9° (PVA-10). Diffraction pattern at this (111) plane became sharper after ultrasonication resulting from an increase in the crystalline structure. A shift of the peak position toward the higher 2θ value was believed as the presence of the compressive residual stress [38,39]. On collapsing, the bubbles from ultrasonication produce microjets and shock waves which can compress and reduce the interlayer spacing of the molecular chains, consequently increasing the lattice strain. The PVA new crystalline fractions may be randomly oriented centre aligned with respect to each other via ultrasonication. For longer ultrasonication durations, CI at the (111) lattice plane for the film shows a more consistent increase in comparison to that at the (101) lattice plane (2θ = 19.5°) as shown in Table 1. CI at diffraction of 2θ = 40.8° for PVA-2.5 increased by 7.49 % compared to PVA-0, but CI at 2θ = 19.5° for PVA-0 was 61.4 %, higher than for PVA-2.5 (60.7 %). This more consistent increase may be attributed to the amount of the chain fraction in the (111) lattice plane for recrystallization being less than that in the (101) lattice plane. Thus the polymer chains at (111) lattice plane are probably more quickly ordered through packing together than at (101) lattice plane. This result is in good agreement with our previous study of the CI of a PVA/starch blend without and with ultrasonication [5].

3.6Thermal analyzing

Fig. 6 shows TG, DTG, and DSC curves of non-sonicated and sonicated PVA films. All the samples show similar patterns with three steps of weight loss as a function of the increasing temperature as shown in Fig. 6(a). The first step, a slight decrease of the weight loss at 75-160 °C corresponds to evaporation of absorbed water [40,41]. The second step (260−480 °C), the large weight loss is attributed to the volatile decomposition of the PVA film [14]. A third weight loss represents a final decomposition to ash [42]. Fig. 6(b) shows that ultrasonication reduces the thermal stability of the PVA film. This is evidenced by the maximum rate of weight loss (0.56 mg/°C at 390 °C) for PVA-0 being lower than that for PVA-2.5 (0.61 mg/°C at 367 °C). The decrease in this thermal stability in the sonicated PVA is attributed to the higher number of free OH groups and the increased number of short PVA chains as media for heat for transfer [5]. Short PVA chains are more mobile than long chains [24]. These media are increasingly vibrated with increasing temperature leading to weakening the hydrogen bonding among intermolecular chains, thus decreasing in thermal stability of the sonicated PVA chains. This result is consistent with FTIR curve for sonicated PVA film which shows higher OH stretching (Fig. 4a) than the non-sonicated one. Fig. 6c shows the DSC curves of the films as a function of temperature. The onset of the melting temperature (To) and the melting point (Tm) of the film increase after ultrasonication. This is evidenced by To and Tm for PVA-0 film are 194 and 196 °C respectively which are lower than that for PVA-7.5 film (199, and 199 °C). These shifts are probably due to more compact structure and increasing the crystal structure of the film [17]. This result is also confirmed by PVA-7.5 film's higher crystallinity index (Fig. 5).

Fig. 6.

TG (a), DTG (b), and DSC (c) for non-sonicated and sonicated film.

(0.26MB).
3.7Tensile properties

Fig. 7 shows the average values of the tensile strength (TS), tensile modulus (TM), and elongation at break (EB) of the non-sonicated and sonicated films. After ultrasonication for 2.5 min, TS was 22.44 MPa higher than PVA-0 (19.80 MPa), an increase of 13.13 %. The increase in TS for PVA-2.5 is because of the increase in the crystallinity fraction of the PVA (see Table 1 at 2θ = 42°) and the lattice strain. The higher CI led to the decrease in the mobility of the PVA chains due to strong hydrogen bonding of the intermolecular interaction of the PVA chains. After 7.5 min ultrasonication, TS reaches a maximum value of 25.50 MPa, 28.79 % higher than TS for PVA-0. This highest value corresponds to the highest CI of PVA-7.5 (29.6 % at 2θ = 42°). The presence of the compressive residual stress (Fig. 5) contributes to improving the tensile properties [38]. The external tensile stress must overcome the compressive residual (negative tensile) stress before the crack tips experience sufficient tensile stress to propagate. Meanwhile, EB increases after ultrasonication despite increasing tensile strength. A possible reason for this is the increase in the slippage between crystalline planes due to the applied shear stress breaking the weaker intermolecular hydrogen bonding between different crystalline segments and aligning the disordered polymer chains.

Fig. 7.

TS (a), TM (b), and EB (c) for the non-sonicated and sonicated film.

(0.56MB).
Fig. 8.

MA (a) and WVP (b) of the non-sonicated and sonicated film.

(0.24MB).
3.8Moisture absorption and water vapor permeability

Fig. 8 displays average MA (a) and WVP (b) values of the non-sonicated and sonicated films after 8 h in 75 % RH at room temperature. PVA-0 had the lowest MA (5.97 %) most certainly due to the fewest number of the free OH groups. This is in good agreement with this sample having the lowest OH stretching (highest T value) as shown in Fig. 4. After ultrasonication of shorter durations (2.5 min), moisture resistance of the film decreased. This is consistent with lowering T values at the OH stretching peak. The MA for PVA-2.5 (8.49 %) was higher than PVA-0 (5.97 %). After longer ultrasonic treatment, MA decreased again just as the T value associated with the hydrophilic functional groups did. After 8 h in moisture chamber, MA for PVA-7.5 was 6.75 %, absorbing 20.55 % less moisture than PVA-2.5. As has been shown, there are fewer free hydroxyl groups in PVA-7.5 probably due to the strong intermolecular interaction of the PVA chains via intermolecular hydrogen bonding [43]. Water is less able to diffuse through this less hydrophilic film. This result is in agreement with previous studies which show decreasing the moisture absorption of the biocomposite film after ultrasonic treatment [14,44]. Furthermore, WVP of both sonicated and non-sonicated films are shown in Fig. 8b. As expected, ultrasonication decreases water vapor permeability. WVP of the PVA-0 film is 30.9 % lower than that of PVA-2.5 film after 24 h. The decrease in WVP is because of more compact polymer structure of sonicated PVA film yielding greater resistance for water molecule diffusion through the film. The non-sonicated film having long polymer chains and high amorphous fraction could provide more spaces for gas to pass through in comparison to the sonicated film. In contrast, after ultrasonication, this space is decreased resulting from restructuring the short-chain via intermolecular interaction, and increased structural compatibility resulting in more barriers for gas to diffuse. This result is consistent with higher crystallinity index (Fig. 5), and higher melting temperature (Fig. 6c) of the film after ultrasonication. A similar phenomenon is also in agreement with previous studies that reported that more homogeneous and compact structure of the starch film reduces WVP [15,45].

4Conclusion

This present study demonstrates that ultrasonication of PVA gel changes significantly the structure and characterizations of the PVA film. The results show that ultrasonication changed the degree of the transparency of the PVA film due to the change in the molecular chain orientation. This mechanical treatment depolymerized the PVA chains. After ultrasonication PVA chains underwent the larger lattice strain and had higher compressive residual stress. Ultrasonication increased the PVA crystallinity index of the film and compatibility of the polymer chain structure. The sonicated PVA film had higher tensile strength and better gas barrier property than non-sonicated film. Even the sonicated film has still high toughness, despite increasing tensile strength. However, this treatment decreases moisture resistance due to the presence of many free OH groups. The weakness of this lower moisture resistance could be reduced using more hydrophobic filler in PVA film prepared with ultrasonication. This work suggests that ultrasonication of PVA gel contributes to meet some necessary properties for food packaging material.

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgement

Acknowledgement is addressed to the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Andalas University for supporting research funding with grant number T/21/UN.16.17/PP.IS.-KRP1GB/LPPM/2019.

References
[1]
W.A.W.A. Rahman, L. Tin, A.R. Rahmat, A.A. Samad.
Thermal behaviour and interactions of cassava starch filled with glycerol plasticized polyvinyl alcohol blends.
Carbohydr Polym, 81 (2010), pp. 805-810
[2]
P.S. Premkumar.
Preparation and electrical studies on pure andoxygen plasma treated polyvinyl alcohol films.
J Mater Res Technol, 8 (2019), pp. 2232-2237
[3]
Z.W. Abdullah, Y. Dong, I.J. Davies, S. Barbhuiya.
PVA, PVA blends, and their nanocomposites for biodegradable packaging application.
Polym Plast Technol Eng, 56 (2017),
[4]
A. Kalambettu, A. Damodaran, S. Dharmalingam, M.T. Vallam.
Evaluation of biodegradation of pineapple leaf Fiber reinforced PVA composites.
J Nat Fibers, 12 (2015), pp. 39-51
[5]
H. Abral, A. Hartono, F. Hafizulhaq, D. Handayani, E. Sugiarti, O. Pradipta.
Characterization of PVA/cassava starch biocomposites fabricated with and without sonication using bacterial cellulose fiber loadings.
Carbohydr Polym, 206 (2018), pp. 593-601
[6]
F. Fahma, N. Hori, T. Iwata, A. Takemura.
PVA nanocomposites reinforced with cellulose nanofibers from oil palm empty fruit bunches (OPEFBs).
Emirates J Food Agric, 29 (2017), pp. 323-329
[7]
M.E. Kabir, M.C. Saha, S. Jeelani.
Effect of ultrasound sonication in carbon nanofibers/polyurethane foam composite.
Mater Sci Eng A, 459 (2007), pp. 111-116
[8]
M. Asrofi, H. Abral, A. Kasim, A. Pratoto, M. Mahardika, F. Hafizulhaq.
Characterization of the sonicated yam bean starch bionanocomposites reinforced by nanocellulose water hyacinth Fiber (Whf): the effect of various Fiber Loading.
J Eng Sci Technol, 13 (2018), pp. 2700-2715
[9]
V.S. Nguyen, D. Rouxel, R. Hadji, B. Vincent, Y. Fort.
Effect of ultrasonication and dispersion stability on the cluster size of alumina nanoscale particles in aqueous solutions.
Ultrason - Sonochemistry, 18 (2011), pp. 382-388
[10]
Q. Cheng, S. Wang, T.G. Rials.
Poly(vinyl alcohol) nanocomposites reinforced with cellulose fibrils isolated by high intensity ultrasonication.
Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf, 40 (2009), pp. 218-224
[11]
W. Li, J. Yue, S. Liu.
Preparation of nanocrystalline cellulose via ultrasound and its reinforcement capability for poly(vinyl alcohol) composites.
Ultrason Sonochem, 19 (2012), pp. 479-485
[12]
Z. Luo, X. Fu, X. He, F. Luo, Q. Gao, S. Yu.
Effect of ultrasonic treatment on the physicochemical properties of maize starches differing in amylose content.
Starch/Staerke, 60 (2008), pp. 646-653
[13]
H.Y. Kim, S.S. Park, S.T. Lim.
Preparation, characterization and utilization of starch nanoparticles.
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 126 (2015), pp. 607-620
[14]
H. Abral, A.S. Anugrah, F. Hafizulhaq, D. Handayani, E. Sugiarti, A.N. Muslimin.
Effect of nanofibers fraction on properties of the starch based biocomposite prepared in various ultrasonic powers.
Int J Biol Macromol, 116 (2018), pp. 1214-1221
[15]
H. Abral, R. Soni Satria, M. Mahardika, F. Hafizulhaq, J. Affi, M. Asrofi, et al.
Comparative study of the physical and tensile properties of jicama (Pachyrhizus erosus) starch film prepared using three different methods.
Starch/Staerke, 71 (2019), pp. 1-9
[16]
A.N. Frone, D.M. Panaitescu, D. Donescu, C.I. Spataru, C. Radovici, R. Trusca, et al.
Preparation and characterization of PVA composites with cellulose nanofibers obtained by ultrasonication.
BioResources, 6 (2011), pp. 487-512
[17]
H. Abral, M.H. Dalimunthe, J. Hartono, R.P. Efendi, M. Asrofi, E. Sugiarti, et al.
Characterization of tapioca starch biopolymer composites reinforced with Micro scale water hyacinth fibers.
Starch/Staerke, 70 (2018), pp. 1-8
[18]
H. Abral, G.J. Putra, M. Asrofi, J. Park, H. Kim.
Effect of vibration duration of high ultrasound applied to bio-composite while gelatinized on its properties.
Ultrason - Sonochemistry, 40 (2018), pp. 697-702
[19]
ASTM D882-12. Standard test method for tensile properties of thin plastic sheeting.
Am Soc Test Mater, (2002),
[20]
M. Asrofi, H. Abral, A. Kasim, A. Pratoto, M. Mahardika.
Isolation of nanocellulose from water hyacinth Fiber (WHF) produced via digester-sonication and its characterization.
Fibers Polym, 19 (2018), pp. 1618-1625
[21]
W. Cheng, J. Chen, D. Liu, X. Ye, F. Ke.
Impact of ultrasonic treatment on properties of starch film-forming dispersion and the resulting films.
Carbohydr Polym, 81 (2010), pp. 707-711
[22]
Y.M. Zhou, S.Y. Fu, L.M. Zheng, H.Y. Zhan.
Effect of nanocellulose isolation techniques on the formation of reinforced poly(vinyl alcohol) nanocomposite films.
Express Polym Lett, 6 (2012), pp. 794-804
[23]
Y. Iida, T. Tuziuti, K. Yasui, A. Towata, T. Kozuka.
Control of viscosity in starch and polysaccharide solutions with ultrasound after gelatinization.
Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol, 9 (2008), pp. 140-146
[24]
H. Abral, V. Lawrensius, D. Handayani, E. Sugiarti.
Preparation of nano-sized particles from bacterial cellulose using ultrasonication and their characterization.
Carbohydr Polym, 191 (2018), pp. 161-167
[25]
A.V. Mohod, P.R. Gogate.
Ultrasonic degradation of polymers: effect of operating parameters and intensification using additives for carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA).
Ultrason Sonochem, 18 (2011), pp. 727-734
[26]
A.N. Nakagaito, M. Nogi, H. Yano.
Displays from transparent films of natural nanofibers.
MRS Bull, 35 (2010), pp. 214-218
[27]
H. Abral, J. Ariksa, M. Mahardika, D. Handayani, I. Aminah, N. Sandrawati, et al.
Transparent and antimicrobial cellulose film from ginger nanofiber.
[28]
F. Hafizulhaq, H. Abral, A. Kasim, S. Arief, J. Affi.
Moisture absorption and opacity of starch-based biocomposites reinforced with cellulose Fiber from Bengkoang.
Fibers, 6 (2018), pp. 62
[29]
F. Miculescu, A. Maidaniuc, M. Miculescu, N. Dan Batalu, R. Catalin Ciocoiu, ŞI. Voicu, et al.
Synthesis and characterization of jellified composites from bovine bone-derived hydroxyapatite and starch as precursors for robocasting.
ACS Omega, 3 (2018), pp. 1338-1349
[30]
M. Asrofi, H. Abral, Y. Kurnia, S.M. Sapuan, H. Kim.
Effect of duration of sonication during gelatinization on properties of tapioca starch water hyacinth fiber biocomposite.
Int J Biol Macromol, 108 (2018), pp. 167-176
[31]
K. Srinivas, K.K. Pandey.
Effect of heat treatment on color changes, dimensional stability, and mechanical properties of wood.
J Wood Chem Technol, 32 (2012), pp. 304-316
[32]
J. Jose, M.A. Al-Harthi, M.A.A. AlMa’adeed, J.B. Dakua, S.K. De.
Effect of graphene loading on thermomechanical properties of poly(vinyl alcohol)/starch blend.
J Appl Polym Sci, 132 (2015), pp. 1-8
[33]
R. Sakai, Y. Teramoto, Y. Nishio.
Producing a magnetically anisotropic soft material: synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles in a carrageenan/PVA matrix and stretching of the hybrid gelatinous bulk.
Polym J, 50 (2018), pp. 251-260
[34]
L. Jiang, T. Yang, L. Peng, Y. Dan.
Acrylamide modified poly(vinyl alcohol): crystalline and enhanced water solubility.
RSC Adv, 5 (2015), pp. 86598-86605
[35]
F. Xu, H. Zhang, L. Jin, Y. Li, J. Li, G. Gan, et al.
Controllably degradable transient electronic antennas based on water-soluble PVA/TiO 2 films.
J Mater Sci, 53 (2018), pp. 2638-2647
[36]
H.E. Assender, A.H. Windle.
Crystallinity in poly(vinyl alcohol). 1. An X-ray diffraction study of atactic PVOH.
Polymer (Guildf), 39 (1998), pp. 4295-4302
[37]
K. Shinozaki, N. Mizutani.
Measurement technique for the evaluation of residual stress in epitaxial thin by asymmetric X-Ray diffraction.
J Ceram Soc Japan, 107 (1999), pp. 606-610
[38]
J. Epp.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) techniques for materials characterization.
[39]
A. Amanov, R. Umarov, T. Amanov.
Increase in strength and fretting resistance of Alloy 718 using the surface modification process.
Materials (Basel), 11 (2018), pp. 1-13
[40]
E. Syafri, A. Kasim, H. Abral, A. Asben.
Cellulose nanofibers isolation and characterization from ramie using a chemical-ultrasonic treatment.
[41]
S.I. Voicu, R.M. Condruz, V. Mitran, A. Cimpean, F. Miculescu, C. Andronescu, et al.
Sericin covalent immobilization onto cellulose acetate membrane for biomedical applications.
ACS Sustain Chem Eng, 4 (2016), pp. 1765-1774
[42]
M. Mahardika, H. Abral, A. Kasim, S. Arief, M. Asrofi.
Production of Nanocellulose from Pineapple Leaf Fibers via High-Shear Homogenization and Ultrasonication.
Fibers, 6 (2018), pp. 1-12
[43]
H. Abral, J. Ariksa, M. Mahardika, D. Handayani, I. Aminah, N. Sandrawati, et al.
Highly transparent and antimicrobial PVA based bionanocomposites reinforced by ginger nanofiber.
[44]
M. Mahardika, H. Abral, A. Kasim, S. Arief, F. Hafizulhaq, M. Asrofi.
Properties of cellulose nanofiber/bengkoang starch bionanocomposites: effect of fiber loading.
LWT - Food Sci Technol, 116 (2019),
[45]
M. Mahardika, H. Abral, A. Kasim, S. Arief, F. Hafizulhaq, M. Asrofi.
Properties of cellulose nanofiber/bengkoang starch bionanocomposites: effect of fiber loading.
Copyright © 2019. The Authors
Journal of Materials Research and Technology

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
Tools
Cookies policy
To improve our services and products, we use cookies (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here.