Journal Information
Vol. 6. Issue 4.
Pages 317-322 (October - December 2017)
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 6. Issue 4.
Pages 317-322 (October - December 2017)
Original Article
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2017.07.001
Open Access
Weibull analysis of the tensile strength dependence with fiber diameter of giant bamboo
Sergio Neves Monteiroa,
Corresponding author

Corresponding author.
, Frederico Muylaert Margemb, Fábio de Oliveira Bragaa, Fernanda Santos da Luza, Noan Tonini Simonassia
a Military Institute of Engineering (IME), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
b State University of the Northern Rio de Janeiro (UENF), Advanced Materials Laboratory (LAMAV), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Full Text
Download PDF
Figures (6)
Show moreShow less
Tables (1)
Table 1. Weibull parameters for the tensile strength of giant bamboo fibers associated with different diameters.

The fibers extracted from the stem of the giant bamboo plant have been investigated as possible composite reinforcement due to their relatively high tensile strength. A dimensional characterization of the distribution and the effect of diameter on the mechanical resistance of bamboo fiber of the species Dendrocalmus giganteus has not yet been performed. The present work characterized the distribution of a bundle of this bamboo fiber. Based on this characterization, diameter intervals were set and the dependence of the tensile strength of these fibers with a corresponding diameter was analyzed by the Weibull method. The results indicated an inverse dependence, in which the highest tensile strength was obtained for the thinnest fibers. Moreover, a mathematical hyperbolic relationship was found to adjust well this inverse correlation. An investigation of the microstructure by means of scanning electron microscopy revealed a potential mechanism for this correlation.

Giant bamboo
Fiber diameter
Tensile strength
Weibull analysis
Full Text

Bamboo is a well known grass-type plant with a hard and stiff stem or culm that can reach, in some species, more than 10cm in cross section diameter and stand several meters height. Owing to its low density, approximately 0.9g/cm3, bamboo culms have been used in house construction from scaffoldings to panels. As an abundant natural resource in tropical and temperate regions, especially in Asia and South America, bamboo is also a substitute for wood and plastics in furniture and even lightweight parts of automobile [1,2]. The cylindrical shape of the culm is, however, a limitation for its direct use in engineering systems. Consequently, research works have been conducted on bamboo fibers stripped off from the culm as reinforcement of polymer composites [1–13]. According to Shin et al. [3] bamboo fiber-epoxy laminates can be made into specific sizes and shapes, preserving the natural microstructural properties. These fiber composites overcome the limitation of the culm's cylindrical macrostructure. As a further advantage, Shin et al. [3] indicated that cracking and bioerosion caused by insect pests is prevented.

Works on the mechanical properties of polymer composites reinforced with culm-stripped bamboo fibers [3–5,12,13] reported mechanical strength and modulus that could vary significantly with the amount of incorporated fiber, the type of polymeric matrix, the fiber disposition (short-cut, continuous, aligned, mat-arranged) and the fiber diameter. In particular, the diameter dependence of the common bamboo fiber (Bambusa vulgaris) was found to vary inversely with the tensile strength [13]. Tensile strength from 100 to 200MPa were obtained for average fiber diameters of 0.85–0.35mm, respectively. Owing to the oriented lignocellulosic structure, as recently reviewed for other natural fibers [14–17], it is relevant to investigate how the mechanical behavior of the stronger species of giant bamboo fibers is affected by its cross section diameter.

Depending on the ability and cutting technique, the manual culm stripping off process produces bamboo fibers with different diameters. Therefore, the objective of this work was to investigate the giant bamboo fiber tensile strength dependence on its diameter using a Weibull statistic analysis, which has been applied in several lignocellulosic fibers, including those from other bamboo species [13,18,19].

2Experimental procedure

The basic material used in this work was the culm of giant bamboo (Dendrocalmus giganteus) supplied by a producer in the state of Rio de Janeiro, southeast of Brazil. Large bamboo bushes, Fig. 1(a), occur naturally in that region. Their culms were cut, Fig. 1(b) and dried for easy fiber extraction. Fibers were manually stripped off from dried culms, Fig. 1(c) with a sharp razor blade. The longitudinal direction of the fiber coincides with that of the culm and corresponds to the natural direction of the bamboo cellulose fibrils. Different cross section diameters were obtained, in spite of the apparently uniform manual stripping procedure. From randomly selected 100 fibers, the equivalent diameter corresponding to the average between the larger and smaller (90° rotation) cross section dimensions at five locations for each fiber, was measured in a profile projector.

Fig. 1.

Bamboo trees (a), dried bamboo culm (b) and its fibers longitudinally stripped with different diameters (c).


The histogram in Fig. 2 shows diameter distribution of stripped giant bamboo fibers used in the present work. Based on Fig. 2, an average diameter of 0.4mm was calculated within the range 0.1–0.7mm. For each interval, 20 fibers were selected. All fibers were then individually tensile tested at 25±2°C in a model 5582 Instron machine. Special grips were used to avoid both fiber slippage and damage. The test length was 6cm and the strain rate 2.1×10−4s−1. It is worth mentioning that similar distributions were obtained for other bamboo species, Bambusa vulgaris, in the interval of fiber diameters from 0.3 to 0.9mm [13], and Guadua angustfolia, from 0.08 to 0.26mm [18].

Fig. 2.

Distribution frequency for the stripped bamboo fibers equivalent diameter.


Values obtained for the tensile strength, i.e. the ultimate stress (σm), were statistically interpreted by means of a Weibull Analysis computer program. A minimum number of 20 fibers from each of the six diameter intervals was considered in the analysis. The program provided the corresponding characteristic stress (θ), the Weibull modulus (β) and the precision adjustment (R2) parameters.

The tensile-ruptured tip of some tested fibers were attached with conducting carbon tape to a metallic support and then gold sputtered for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observation in a model SSX-550 Shimadzu equipment operating with secondary electrons accelerated at a maximum voltage of 15kV.

3Results and discussion

Fig. 3 shows typical load vs. elongation curves that are representative of the behavior observed for fibers in all diameter intervals. These curves present an initial linear elastic behavior followed by an abrupt rupture with no apparent plastic extension. Consequently, for all diameter intervals, the culm-stripped giant bamboo fiber can be considered as a brittle material.

Fig. 3.

Typical tensile load vs. diameter of bamboo fibers for different diameter intervals shown in Fig. 2.


Based on the maximum load, Fig. 3, the tensile strength of each fiber was obtained and the values statistically analyzed by the Weibull method for each diameter interval in Fig. 2. Fig. 4 shows corresponding Weibull reliability vs. location parameter plots. It should be noted that all plots in this figure are unimodal with one straight line fitting the points in the same diameter interval. Similar plots were obtained not only for different bamboo species but also other natural lignocellulosic fibers [13,19].

Fig. 4.

Tensile strength Weibull plots for the different diameter intervals of giant bamboo fibers shown in Fig. 2.


The values of the Weibull parameters (β, θ and R2), as well as the average mechanical strength and associated statistical deviations, are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Weibull parameters for the tensile strength of giant bamboo fibers associated with different diameters.

Diameter interval (mm)  Weibull Modulus, β  Characteristic stress, θ (MPa)  Precision adjustment, R2  Tensile strength (MPa)  Statistical deviation (MPa) 
0.1–0.2  1.174  411.1  0.8856  389  212.4 
0.2–0.3  1.737  341.8  0.9415  304.5  180.8 
0.3–0.4  1.708  256.1  0.9776  228.4  137.7 
0.4–0.5  2.358  229.8  0.9066  203.7  91.83 
0.5–0.6  2.892  210.8  0.9567  187.9  70.59 
0.6–0.7  2.107  235.8  0.9783  208.8  104.2 

Based on the R2 parameter, it can be concluded that the data follows a Weibull statistical distribution with good precision. The variation of the characteristic stress (θ) and the tensile strength (σ¯m) with the average fiber diameter for each one of its intervals are presented in Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Variation of the (a) characteristic stress and (b) tensile strength with the diameter for each interval in Fig. 2.


In Fig. 5(a), there is a tendency for the θ parameter to vary inversely with the average giant bamboo fiber diameter. This tendency is similar to that found for the common bamboo (Bambusa vulgaris) [13] but with improved parameter. Indeed, the giant bamboo fiber tensile strength varied from 210 to 411MPa with corresponding average diameter respectively from 0.15 to 0.65mm of average diameter. By means of a mathematic correlation, a hyperbolic equation was proposed to fit the data in Fig. 5.

In order to analyze the physical meaning of Eq. (1), the average tensile strength, σ¯m, evaluated in this work for the culm-stripped giant bamboo fibers was plotted as a function of the diameter in Fig. 5(b). In this figure an apparent hyperbolic inverse correlation also exists between σ¯m and d within the error bars (statistical deviations) and investigated limits.

Here it is important to mention that the large dispersion (error bars) in the values of the tensile strength in Fig. 5(b) is due to the heterogeneous and random characteristics of the biological process of formation of any lignocellulosic fiber [20], such as the giant bamboo in this work. As a consequence, one could also consider a horizontal line passing within the error bars as a possible correlation between σ¯m and d. In this case, the tensile strength would not vary with the diameter. However, the variation of θ with d in Fig. 5(a) suggests that an inverse correlation adjusts better the experimental results for the giant bamboo fibers. It is also possible to consider that the values of σ¯m in Fig. 5(b) and θ in Fig. 5(a) are approximately constant, around 200MPa, for fibers thicker than 0.4mm. Under this consideration, only the thinner giant bamboo fibers, d0.4mm, present the inverse correlation, but not necessarily hyperbolic. This should be further investigated. Based on Eqs. (1) and (2) it is suggested that, as in other lignocellulosic fibers [13], a hyperbolic type of mathematical equation is the best statistical correlation between the tensile strength and the diameter of culm-stripped giant bamboo fibers. A simple inverse tensile strength vs. diameter correlation was also found in Chinese Moso bamboo fibers (Phillostachys edulis) [19]. However, for a Guandua angustifolia bamboo species fiber, Trujillo et al. [18] reported only dispersed values of fiber strength within a limited diameter interval from 0.1 to 0.22mm.

A SEM observation of the tip of representative tensile-ruptured fibers, shown in Fig. 6, provided further evidence of a fracture mechanism that could justify the hyperbolic correlation in Eq. (2). With the same magnification, the thinner fiber, Fig. 6(a), shows a more uniform fracture associated with lesser fibrils. By contrast, a fiber with larger diameters, Fig. 6(b), displays a relatively non-uniform fracture with participation of more fibrils. Statistically, there is always a chance that one of the many fibrils of the thicker giant bamboo fiber in Fig. 6(b), would prematurely break and then act as a flaw to cause the fiber rupture at a lower stress as compared to the thinner fiber, Fig. 6(a). In other words, the larger distribution of fibrils strength of the thicker fiber allows one of them breaking shortly than any of the fewer fibrils of a thinner fiber. Wang and Shao [19] also attributed the reduction in mechanical properties of bamboo fibers to accumulation of defects within fiber diameter variations.

Fig. 6.

SEM fractographs with same magnification of tensile-ruptured bamboo fibers: (a) thinner, d=0.1255mm and (b) thicker, d=0.6946mm.


As a final remark, it should be mentioned that an inverse correlation such as that in Eq. (2), could allow, in practice, a selection of stronger culm-stripped thinner giant bamboo fibers to effectively reinforced polymer composites with improved mechanical properties. The tensile strength of these stronger thinner fibers, Table 1 and Fig. 5, indicates an advantage over other natural fibers [13–17] as feasible reinforcement of polymer composites.


  • A Weibull statistical analysis of tensile-tested manually culm-stripped giant bamboo fibers revealed an inverse correlation between the tensile strength and the fiber diameter.

  • This correlation is similar to that found for the much weaker common bamboo fibers and indicates a possible hyperbolic mathematical equation to hold, at least, for diameters below 0.4mm.

  • SEM observations provided evidences that a thicker giant bamboo fiber, with more fibrils than a thinner one, could undergo rupture at a comparatively lower stress. Statistically, the larger distribution of mechanical resistances of fibrils in the thicker fiber allows the weakest fibril to break shortly than any of the fewer fibrils of the thinner fiber.

  • The tensile strength above 300MPa obtained for thinner fibers of giant bamboo is a desirable condition for their application as reinforcement of polymer composites.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


The authors thank the support to this work by the Brazilian agencies: CNPq, CAPES, and FAPERJ.

X. Chen, Q. Guo, Y. Mi.
Bamboo fiber reinforced polypropylene composites: a study of the mechanical properties.
J Appl Polym Sci, 69 (1998), pp. 1891-1899
S. Shibata, C. Yong, I. Fukumoto.
Flexural modulus of the unidirectional and random composites made from biodegradable resin and bamboo and kenaf fibres.
Compos Part A, 39 (2008), pp. 640-646
F.G. Shin, X.J. Xian, W.P. Zhena, M.W. Yipp.
Analysis of the mechanical properties and microstructure of bamboo epoxy composites.
J Mater Sci, 24 (1989), pp. 3483-3490
S. Jain, R. Kumar, U.C. Jindal.
Mechanical behavior of bamboo and bamboo composites.
J Mater Sci, 27 (1992), pp. 4598-4604
S. Jain, R. Kumar, U.C. Jindal.
Development and fracture mechanism of the bamboo/polyester resin composite.
J Mater Sci Lett, 12 (1993), pp. 558-560
J. Seema, R. Kumar.
Processing of bamboo fiber reinforced plastics composites.
Mater Manuf Proc, 9 (1994), pp. 813-828
M.M. Thwe, K. Liao.
Effects of environmental aging on the mechanical properties of bamboo glass fiber reinforced polymer matrix hybrid composites.
Compos Part A, 33 (2002), pp. 43-52
K. Okubo, T. Fujii, Y. Yamamoto.
Development of bamboo based polymer composites and their mechanical properties.
Compos Part A, 35 (2004), pp. 377-383
K. Okubo, T. Fujii, N. Yamashita.
Improvement of interfacial adhesion in bamboo polymer composite enhanced with micro-fibrillated cellulose.
JSME Int J A Solid M, 48 (2005), pp. 199-204
S.H. Lee, W. Siqun.
Biodegradable polymer/bamboo fiber biocomposite with bio-based coupling agent.
Compos Part A, 37 (2006), pp. 80-91
X. Huang, A. Netravali.
Biodegradable green composites made using bamboo micro/nano-fibrils and chemically modified soy protein resin.
Compos Sci Tech, 69 (2009), pp. 1009-1015
L.L. Costa, S.N. Monteiro, R.L. Loiola.
Mechanical behavior of polyester composites reinforced with continuous bamboo fibers.
Proceedings of the characterization of minerals, metals & materials – TMS conference 2010, pp. 1-6
S.N. Monteiro, F.P.D. Lopes, A.P. Barbosa, A.B. Bevitori, I.L. Silva, L.L. Costa.
Natural lignocellulosic fibers as engineering materials – an Overview.
Metall Mater Trans A, 42 (2011), pp. 2963-2974
O. Faruk, A.K. Bledzki, H.-P. Fink, M. Sain.
Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000–2010.
Prog Polym Sci, 37 (2012), pp. 1552-1596
V.K. Thakur, M.K. Thakur, R.K. Gupta.
Review: raw natural fibers based polymer composites.
Intern J Polym Anal Charact, 19 (2014), pp. 256-271
O. Güven, S.N. Monteiro, E.A.B. Moura, J.W. Drelich.
Re-emerging field of lignocellulosic fiber-polymer composites and ionizing radiation technology in their formulation.
Polym Rev, 56 (2016), pp. 702-736
K.L. Pickering, M.G.A. Efendy, T.M. Le.
A review of recent developments in natural fibre composites and their mechanical performance.
Compos Part A, 83 (2016), pp. 98-112
E. Trujillo, M. Moesen, L. Osorio, A.W. Van Vuure, J. Ivens, I. Verpoest.
Bamboo fiber for reinforcement in composite materials: Strength Weibull analysis.
Compos Part A, 61 (2014), pp. 115-125
F. Wang, J. Shao.
Modified Weibull distribution for analyzing the tensile strength of bamboo fibers.
Polymers, 6 (2014), pp. 3005-3018
S.N. Monteiro, F.P.D. Lopes, A.S. Ferreira, D.C.O. Nascimento.
Natural fiber polymer matrix composites: cheaper, tougher and environmentally friendly.
JOM, 61 (2009), pp. 17-22

Paper was a contribution part of the 3rd Pan American Materials Congress, February 26th to March 2nd, 2017.

Copyright © 2017. Brazilian Metallurgical, Materials and Mining Association
Journal of Materials Research and Technology

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
Cookies policy
To improve our services and products, we use cookies (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here.