Journal Information
Vol. 8. Issue 3.
Pages 2481-3388 (May - June 2019)
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 8. Issue 3.
Pages 2481-3388 (May - June 2019)
Original Article
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.02.012
Open Access
Technical and environmental evaluation of a new high performance material based on magnesium alloy reinforced with submicrometre-sized TiC particles to develop automotive lightweight components and make transport sector more sustainable
Victor Ferreiraa, Mikel Merchánb, Pedro Egizabalb, Maider García de Cortázarb, Ane Irazustabarrenab, Ana M. López-Sabiróna, German Ferreiraa,
Corresponding author

Corresponding author.
a Research Centre for Energy Resources and Consumption (CIRCE), CIRCE Building – Campus Río Ebro, Mariano Esquillor Gómez, 15, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain
b Fundación Tecnalia Research & Innovation, Departamento de Fundición y Siderurgia, Mikeletegi Pasealekua 2, 20009 Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Full Text
Download PDF
Figures (13)
Show moreShow less
Tables (4)
Table 1. Environmental impact indicators studied.
Table 2. Main inputs and outputs relevant for environmental analysis of the die casting magnesium.
Table 3. Mechanical properties of submicron reinforced AM60 alloy. Standard deviation values are provided in parenthesis.
Table 4. Results on environmental impact for the primary alloy production (aluminium and magnesium).
Show moreShow less

This study evaluated the use of submicrometre-sized particles based on titanium carbide from both technical and environmental points of view. The objective was to improve the mechanical properties of the magnesium alloy intended for use in the automotive component industry. To this end, an Al/TiC master compound containing 60wt.% of TiC was produced through a self-propagating, high-temperature synthesis process and embedded in a magnesium alloy by a mechanical stirring method. The life cycle assessment methodology was then used to evaluate the environmental impact of the manufacturing of the magnesium alloy reinforced with submicrometre-sized particles. X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy techniques revealed the nature and purity of the TiC present in the material and revealed particle sizes below submicrometre range (300–500nm). The incorporation of TiC particles into the magnesium alloy resulted in improvements in yield stress and ultimate tensile strength of more than 10% and 18%, respectively, and increases in ductility values by 30%. Finally, the results indicated that the submicrometre particle production had a low environmental impact compared with the total impact associated with manufacturing the magnesium alloy reinforced with submicrometre-sized particles; the greatest environmental burden was attributed to the magnesium production stage. However, this impact is offset in the use phase of the vehicle, providing approximately 28,000km of mileage for a car.

CO2 eq emissions
Full Text

The transport sector is one of the most polluting sectors in Europe. According to the European Commission [1], this sector releases more than 50% of the total NOx emissions, approximately 60% of CO emissions, and 25% of total energy-related CO2 emissions. Considering the latter value, 80% of CO2 emissions come specifically from road transport. Passenger cars provide the largest contribution, approximately 45% of CO2 emissions. Accounting for this, one of the main priorities of the European policies is to reduce Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions by 60% compared to the 1990 levels [2]. The current European strategy recognises the positive results of certain measures already taken at the European Union (EU) level, but has underlined that further progress is required in research and technological development, in particular to reduce CO2 emissions [3].

Several strategies have since been launched. Some improvements are being achieved in the performance of conventional engines, for example, using variable geometries of the valve lift and the throat diameter [4], introducing selective catalysts to reduce emissions [5], or adapting the engine for using alternative fuels or blends [6,7]. Additionally, alternative technologies to the conventional engines with a lower emission ratio are being developed, such as electric vehicles, which may be self-contained with a generator to convert fuel to electricity (hydrogen fuel cells) [8,9] or a battery that may be powered through a collector system by electricity from off-vehicle sources [10,11].

Finally, a current strategy is to improve car design by using lightweight materials to produce the car body and its components, decreasing the total weight and thus, the fuel consumption and associated emissions [12,13]. The most used materials in the automotive sector are steel and aluminium [14]. However, in recent years, there have been attempts in the automotive sector to substitute these materials with lighter ones, such as composite materials based on glass fibres [15], polymers [16], and magnesium [17]. The latter is the most promising material for structural components as it is the lightest structural metal.

The density of magnesium is around 33% lower than that of aluminium and approximately a fifth that of steel. Therefore, there is an opportunity to save fuel by using this in vehicle components and, consequently, achieve the required CO2 emission reduction. Nevertheless, it is also important to evaluate the mechanical properties resulting from the utilisation of magnesium alloys in car parts and to ensure that they can accomplish the technical requirements of the automotive sector.

As reported by Gupta and Wong [18], although magnesium alloy components can be obtained from cast processes, these can exhibit disadvantages with regards to elasticity, ductility, and resistance properties. Although some surface protection materials such as fibrous szaibelyite [19] or other stable super-hydrophobic surfaces with pinecone-like hierarchical structures [20] are being developed to avoid corrosion, recent trends are focused on the development of new magnesium alloys based on materials including microscale reinforcements to overcome their mechanical and physical limitations.

Some studies have shown that magnesium properties are improved by the incorporation of submicrometre reinforcements. Oxides, nitrides, borides or metal carbides [18] are considered as some of the most promising reinforcements; TiC shows particular promise [21,22]. The type of synthesis method can also affect the final properties [23]. Therefore, the preparation of these novel materials generates the necessity to analyse their final mechanical and physical properties. Nevertheless, studies surrounding magnesium-based materials including submicrometre-sized reinforcements for the transport sector are very scarce and, according to the author's knowledge, there is no literature data simultaneously including a technical and environmental evaluation of the materials and production processes [24,25]. The environmental analysis conducted in this paper focused on the life cycle of an exemplary component to be used in a gasoline passenger vehicle. The component was fabricated using a magnesium alloy reinforced with submicrometre-scale particles of the Al/TiC master compound containing 60wt.% of TiC. To this end, life cycle assessment (LCA) was the methodology applied, which is regulated under the ISO 14040 standard [26]. The LCA methodology allows the assessment of the potential impacts associated with raw material acquisition, via the production, use phases, and waste management involved throughout the life cycle of the product [27,28].

As mentioned before, an evaluation of the environmental impacts associated with the manufacturing of vehicle components using the magnesium alloy reinforced with submicrometre-scale particles was performed. This assessment was carried out through a LCA) methodology, which is useful for assessing impacts along the life cycle of a product, which broadens the scope of the environmental analysis [29]. The RECIPE method was used to classify the environmental impacts into the most representative midpoint categories of the entire manufacturing process and the results were computed using the SIMAPRO v.8 software. These are midpoint indicators evaluated using the RECIPE method. Midpoint indicators are considered to be points in the cause–effect chain (environmental mechanism) of a particular impact category somewhere between the stressor and endpoints. For such midpoints, the characterisation factors can therefore be calculated to reflect the relative importance of an emission or extraction in a life cycle inventory (LCI) by environmental metrics [27]. To develop the LCA, the production processes of both aluminium and magnesium have been considered. Bauxite, aluminium hydrate, and aluminium oxide are the main raw materials consumed in aluminium production, with bauxite as the main resource (up to 85%) [30]. An overview of the typical life cycle of an aluminium process has been reported by the Environmental Profile Report for the European Aluminium Industry [31]. Based on the scheme to produce aluminium proposed by that report and additional specialised literature, as well as articles and reports, significant variables were collected to create a complete database for environmental modelling.

The majority of the world's magnesium is produced in China and the main process used is the Pidgeon process, which has improved in efficiency over the past few years [32]. This process has been well characterised by Ehrenberger, who performed data collection based on production statistics and fuel consumption by the Chinese Magnesium Association (CMA) provided by magnesium producers [33]. Due to the fact that up-to-date and reliable data and results for magnesium production are provided, the life cycle inventory of magnesium production by the Pidgeon process is accounted for from Ehrenberger's work to create a complete LCI for the environmental modelling of this study.

Moreover, another scenario for primary magnesium production addressing the typical process carried out by a Norwegian producer has been considered. This was the world's largest magnesium producer in the 1990s. Although this facility in Porsgrunn (Norway) was closed in early 2000, this is the most representative plant for the production of primary magnesium in Europe.

Here, magnesium is produced from seawater and dolomite. The process starts by producing Mg(OH)2 from calcination of dolomite by mixing with seawater followed by the precipitation and filtration of Mg(OH)2. The filter cake from the latter process then undergoes calcination to produce MgO. Chlorination of MgO allows MgCl2 to be obtained, which is electrolysed and eventually ingots are produced in the foundry.

Thus, the LCI for magnesium production was based on the environmental reports of Norks Hydro for the year 1998, contained in the database of the SimaPro software version 8.0 (not shown here due to confidentiality issues).

Finally, there is one other significant impact factor in the processes for magnesium alloy production. Magnesium alloy production needs a cover gas to prevent degradation from contact with the surrounding atmosphere. Two gases are usually used, SF6 and SO2. The Chinese Pidgeon process uses sulphur or fluxes containing small amounts of sulphur to prevent the magnesium melt from burning [34]. However, SF6 contributes a significant environmental burden in terms of CO2 eq., as this gas is considered a GHG. Therefore, the process such as that in the Norwegian plant, assumed in the environmental model of this study, considers an alternative gas cover, namely R134 gas, which is considered an environmentally-friendly protection gas with reference to cast magnesium.

Thus, this study aims to fill part of this information gap by a technical and environmental evaluation of submicrometre-sized particles based on TiC as an approach for improving the mechanical properties of magnesium alloy to produce automotive components. An Al/TiC master compound containing 60wt.% of TiC was produced through a self-propagating high-temperature synthesis (SHS) process and embedded in a magnesium alloy by a mechanical stirring method. The technical evaluation was conducted by analysing the most representative physical and mechanical properties. To this end, X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) techniques were used to investigate the nature and purity of the TiC particulates in the material and their sizes. The mechanical properties, namely yield stress, tensile strength, and ductility, were tested following the ASTM E8/E8M-13a standard.

2Experimental techniques and methodology for the environmental evaluation2.1Material preparation

For the preparation of the magnesium composite reinforced with TiC particulates, an Al/TiC master compound containing pure aluminium and TiC particles was prepared and added to the molten magnesium alloy. The master compound was prepared by an SHS reaction of the Al-Ti-C system.

To prepare the master compound, the following materials were used: aluminium powder (supplied by Pometon España S.A. with a purity of 99.5% and average particle size lower than 200μm), titanium powder (with a composition of Ti 99.7%, C 0.1% max., and Fe 0.2% max. provided by William Rowland Ltd. with an average particle size lower than 25μm) and black carbon powder (with a purity of 99.5%, average particle size less than 1μm provided by Degussa). Subsequently, in order to prepare the magnesium matrix composite, this master compound was added in powder form to a molten AM60 magnesium alloy. This alloy was supplied by Dead Sea Magnesium in Israel in ingot shape, containing a wt.% of 6.0 Al, 0.36 Mn, 0.1 Zn, and Mg (Balance).

Detail description about the preparation of the Al/TiC master compound and magnesium alloy reinforced with submicrometre-sized particles, mechanical property tests, and material characterisation are given below.

2.1.1Al/TiC master alloy preparation

Titanium and carbon powders were mixed in a molar ratio of Ti/C=1.0 and 40wt.% of Al powder was added to this stoichiometric mixture. This was then dry mixed for 4h using a ball mill, before being uniaxially cold pressed at a pressure of 100MPa using a hydraulic press and a stainless steel die. A cylindrical compact with approximately 60% theoretical density was obtained. To initiate the SHS reaction, the compact was locally heated using a current of 16V for 5s. Submicrometre TiC particulates with a size range of 300–500nm were formed in an aluminium matrix through an SHS reaction.

2.1.2Preparation of AM60 samples reinforced with submicrometre-scale particles

For the preparation of the particle-reinforced magnesium composite, a stir casting method was employed. This method consists of mechanically stirring the molten alloy until a vortex is generated, into which the reinforcing particles are subsequently added. The master compound compact was first ball-milled for 8h in order to reduce its size. Approximately 1700g of AM60 alloy were then introduced in a silicon carbide crucible and heated in a high-frequency induction furnace. A k-type thermocouple was introduced in the crucible in order to measure the temperature of the molten alloy and stabilise it at approximately 700°C for the stirring process. Once completely liquid, and after the dross layer generated in the surface was removed, a graphite stirrer was introduced inside the crucible, very close to the bottom surface of the crucible. The molten alloy was stirred at 360rpm and the master compound powder was manually added into the vortex. The stirring was then maintained for 10min. Finally, the stirrer was stopped and removed from the crucible and the molten material was cast in an iron mould. Once completely solid, the cast part was demoulded in order to be characterised.

2.2Characterisation of magnesium alloy reinforced with submicrometre-sized particles2.2.1Physical properties

XRD and SEM were used to carry out the metallographic analysis of the cast samples. A small sample was cut from each cast part and the surface of the sample was prepared by grinding through grit papers of various sizes followed by polishing with diamond paste.

The surface morphology was investigated by using SEM, model JEOL JEM 5910 LV, equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray analyser (EDX) to make a semi-quantitative analysis of the composition of the different phases of the sample.

The XRD pattern was recorded on a Bruker D8 ADVANCE with Cu Kα radiation and a step size of 0.02°. The Diffract plus EVA software was used to identify the crystallographic phases present.

2.2.2Mechanical properties

From the cast parts, tensile specimens were machined in order to be tensile tested at room temperature following the ASTM E8/E8M-13a standard; for these tests, an INSTRON machine was used. The specimen was mounted in the machine and tested at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min. The strength and elongation were continuously recorded. Six specimens were tested for both the TiC-reinforced magnesium alloy and the unreinforced alloy.

2.3Environmental analysis of an automotive component based on manufacturing of magnesium alloy reinforced with submicrometre-sized particles

LCA methodology considers four main phases to provide guidance for greater consistency and quality assurance, which are briefly outlined in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Main phases of an LCA study.

2.3.1Scope of the environmental analysis and functional unit

In this study, which concerns vehicle components, the identification of a lightweight material that exhibits improved mechanical properties is a feasible goal. Firstly, the evaluation was performed by the quantification of the environmental impacts of two steps, alloy production and the die casting process. Secondly, the use phase was also considered calculating the CO2 equivalent (CO2 eq.) saving during the lifetime of a car using a light component (see Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Overview of magnesium life cycle for manufacturing transport application.


The methodological framework of this study includes the impact midpoints indicators described in Table 1. The functional unit is declared as one final part of the component evaluated (generic body-joint component).

Table 1.

Environmental impact indicators studied.

Impact category  Unit 
Climate change  kg CO2 eq. 
Ozone depletion  kg CFC-11 eq. 
Terrestrial acidification  kg SO2eq 
Freshwater eutrophication  kg P eq. 
Marine eutrophication  kg N eq. 
Human toxicity  kg 1,4-DB eq. 
Photochemical oxidant formation  kg NMVOC 
Particulate matter formation  kg PM10 eq. 
Terrestrial ecotoxicity  kg 1,4-DB eq. 
Freshwater ecotoxicity  kg 1,4-DB eq. 
Marine ecotoxicity  kg 1,4-DB eq. 
Ionising radiation  kBq U235 eq. 
Agricultural land occupation  m2
Urban land occupation  m2
Natural land transformation  m2 
Water depletion  m3 
Fossil depletion  kg oil eq. 
2.3.2System description and boundaries

In order to include relevant effects during the life cycle of the reinforced material, a cradle-to-gate approach was chosen for the first analysis, considering tow cases involving lightweight alloys with the aim of comparison between aluminium alloys, as reference, and magnesium alloy. The consequence of the fuel savings caused by the lightweight material usage were carried out as a secondary analysis. The boundaries are depicted in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Description of the system boundaries in the study of life cycle for the passenger vehicle component fabricated using magnesium alloy reinforced with the submicrometre particles.

2.3.3Life cycle inventory (LCI)

The analysis for the LCI was divided into two levels. Firstly, a background analysis containing secondary standardised data, used in the models for all the life cycle steps including all upstream processes, to provide energy and material inputs for magnesium and aluminium production (described in the introduction section). Secondly, a foreground analysis, containing primary detailed data. The latter considers the relevant inputs and outputs associated with the die casting processes to produce the component reinforced with the submicrometre particles. All environmental models were performed using SimaPro v8.0 software. analysis: Metal production

For this analysis, a consistent in-house database, comparable with commercial databases such as ecoinvent version 3, was used to provide the most relevant, reliable, transparent, and accessible LCI secondary data. The analysis started with the data shown in Fig. 4, which shows that the primary production of aluminium and magnesium is dominated by China. It can be seen that in 2012 China produced 75% and 34% of the global magnesium and aluminium in the world, respectively. Moreover, the production of primary magnesium (2012) is confined to only ten countries [35,36]. It seems that no European countries are currently listed among the main primary magnesium producing countries.

Fig. 4.

Production of magnesium (left) and aluminium (right), 2012 [26,27].


These data cannot be overlooked, since the analysis of the life cycle depends significantly on primary production allocation. In particular, this depends on the available energy sources in each country, which significantly influence the preparation of a complete database about the process for production of the aforementioned metals. Thus, the technology for environmental modelling assumed in this study is performed considering the standard aluminium technology in Europe for primary production.

Nevertheless, in case of magnesium, the main technologies across the globe should be considered. Therefore, two scenarios for the primary production of magnesium were taken into account in this study; the first consisting of the main process for producing magnesium in China, namely, the Pidgeon process, and the second a magnesium production plant based on electrolysis from resources like seawater and dolomite [37].

The authors have considered these two scenarios because of the marked differences between the two production technologies for primary magnesium. To aid understanding, a brief description of the production processes considered for these two metals (Al and Mg) and their alloying are described in the introduction section. analysis: Die casting process to produce the Al and Mg alloy components

Die casting is the process analysed to produce the component either with aluminium or magnesium reinforced with the submicrometre particles. It is a manufacturing process normally featuring two furnaces, a melting and holding furnace. The solid metal is melted in the melting furnace, before being transferred to the holding furnace, in which the temperature is kept constant with a lower power to avoid its solidification. The molten metal is transferred from the holding furnace to a shot sleeve in order to be injected into the die cavity under a high pressure to obtain the desired casting [38]. The process includes machining and cooling stages (additional stages) after the solidification stage, in which the part is deburred in order to remove excess metal. The remaining metal can be melted again in future cycles.

In order to compare the magnesium die casting with the aluminium process, the materials and energy balance were calculated for the functional unit. In both cases, the weight of the component is the reference flow used in the energy and material flow model. The weights were 1.85kg and 2.85kg for the magnesium and aluminium components, respectively.

Moreover, it is important to highlight that the reinforced magnesium die casting process has an additional stage (see case A in Fig. 3), which is the system mixing. Therefore, this and the Al/TiC synthesis stage were taken into account for the LCI. Detailed information about the LCI is not shown here because of confidentiality issues, however the main magnesium LCI data referred to for the functional unit are summarised in Table 2.

Table 2.

Main inputs and outputs relevant for environmental analysis of the die casting magnesium.

Functional unit=1 product final part=1.85kg
Alloy magnesium (AM60)  2.1  kg/unit 
Al/TiC master alloy  0.0325  kg/unit 
Annual water  4.9×10−4  m3/unit 
N2  1.84×10−4  m3/unit 
SO2  3.60×10−6  m3/unit 
N2  1.8×10−4  m3/unit 
SO2  3.6×10−6  m3/unit 
Produced dross  0.011  kg/unit 
Dirty aluminium  0.0013  kg/unit 
Final product  1.85  kg/unit 
Water  4.9×10−4  m3/unit 
Melting and pre-heating furnace (Electricity)  1.1  kWh/unit 
Holding furnace (Electricity)  0.8  kWh/unit 
SHS process (Electricity)  0.2  kWh/unit 
Mixing system (Electricity)  0.5  kWh/unit 
2.3.4Savings calculation of CO2 eq.

A vehicle using parts from lightweight materials can have a reduced weight and therefore save fuel during vehicle operation. This results in a direct reduction in CO2 eq. emissions during vehicle operation. Emissions of CO2 and other GHGs decrease in proportion to the decrease in fuel consumption. It is worth noting that this does not apply to other emissions, such as particles or nitrogen oxides, because the development of emissions provoked by fuel savings is ambiguous.

Thus, the equation shown below, based on the work of Koffler and Rohde-Brandenburger [39], has been used for calculating the fuel saving in this study.

The saved fuel has units of fuel saving [l/100km], m and mref are the masses of the alternative and reference components in kg, respectively. The constant R is the fuel reduction coefficient expressed in units [l/(100km×100kg)]. The value of the fuel reduction coefficient is also based on the work of Koffler and Rohde-Brandenburger [39]. They reported a value of 0.35l/100km based on the standard new European driving cycle (NEDC) for passenger cars. This parameter is important, since it reflects the implications in terms of energy efficiency of the use of the magnesium component in an optimised vehicle. According to the aforementioned authors, the parameter R includes secondary measures when the energy consumption is calculated based on the NEDC.

2.3.5Cut-off criteria

The following cut-off criteria were used in the environmental analysis to ensure that all relevant environmental impacts were represented in the study:

  • (i)

    Materials: flows of less than 1% of the cumulative mass of all the inputs and outputs of the LCI model, depending on the type of flow, were excluded because their environmental impact is negligible.

  • (ii)

    Energy: flows of less than 1% of the cumulative energy of all the inputs and outputs of the LCI model, depending on the type of flow, were excluded because their environmental relevance is negligible.

However, it was ensured that the sum of neglected material flows did not exceed 5% of the mass, energy, or environmental relevance. These criteria were established based on an in-depth analysis of the system using the operational energy and mass balances for the processes involved.

3Results and discussion3.1Technical evaluation

The results obtained in the tensile tests confirm the benefits of adding the submicrometre TiC particulates to the magnesium alloy. The addition of 1wt.% of particles leads to improvements of 11% and 18% in the yield stress and ultimate tensile strength values respectively and 30% in the ductility of the material. The microstructural analysis shows the presence of some small TiC aggregates but the balance of the effect of the presence TiC particulates is positive. TiC particulates appear both in the centre of the aluminium grains and the intergranular region and should contribute to strengthen the alloy by hindering the movement of dislocations through the Hall-Petch effect related to the decrease in the grain size, Orowan effect and the increase in the density of dislocations during the solidification stage due to the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) mismatch of the AM60 matrix and TiC.

3.1.1Material characterisation

The production of the final reinforced AM60/(TiC 1wt.%) material was carried out in two stages. Firstly, production of the Al/(TiC 60wt.%) master alloy by SHS and subsequently production of the AM60/(TiC 1wt.%) reinforced alloy by stir casting. Following the microstructures of the materials obtained in each stage are shown and discussed. Fig. 5 shows the physical aspect of the material obtained after the SHS process.

Fig. 5.

Al/TiC master alloy produced by SHS containing 40wt.% of pure free aluminium manually crushed before the ball milling process.

(0.08MB). of Al/TiC master compound

Fig. 6a shows the microstructure of the Al/TiC (30:70) compound obtained by SHS in the preliminary trials. TiC particulates appear as round particulates coated and surrounded by pure aluminium that is present in 30wt.%. The microscopy observation of the samples shows that the self-propagating reaction has taken place correctly and there is neither any presence of loose Ti or C particulates nor any secondary product.

Fig. 6.

(a) Scanning electron micrograph of Al/TiC powders in a 30/70 ratio. The size of the TiC particulates ranges from 0.5 up to 7μm, (b) Scanning electron micrograph of Al/TiC powder with Ti powder of 106 and 45μm, (c) Scanning electron micrograph of TiC sample showing submicrometre-sized particles produced by SHS mixed with large particulates.


The size of the TiC particulates ranges from 0.5 up to 7μm. The surface of TiC particulates is clean. Particulates are well wetted and appear covered by aluminium. Furthermore, there is not any clue of other secondary reactions that could lead to the formation of TiAl3 or Al4C3 particulates. These observations are further confirmed with the results of the XRD analysis (see Fig. 7) where only Al and TiC appear. Nonetheless the goal of the work was to produce submicrometre-sized TiC particles and therefore the process to obtain a second generation of particulates was developed.

Fig. 7.

XRD pattern of Al/TiC powders.

(0.22MB). of the second generation of submicrometre-sized TiC

Two different approaches were tried to achieve submicrometre-sized TiC particles. On the one hand the use of elemental Ti powders having smaller sizes and on the other hand the acceleration of the solidification stage immediately after the end of the combustion in the SHS process so that the particles could not coalesce and grow within the reaction chamber.

Previous experiences accumulated by the authors had shown that the size of the initial powder of Ti used in the SHS reaction could have a direct influence on the size of the TiC powders obtained after the process. When using Ti powder with a size of 150μm the average size of TiC particulates was around 1.5μm (see Fig. 6a). The size decreased down to 0.5–5μm when Ti powders of 106μm were used (see Fig. 6b) and this size got further decreased with smaller Ti grain sizes 0.3–3μm. Even so it was also observed that the difference of the TiC particulates obtained with Ti powders of 45 and 25μm was minimal and therefore the size of 45μm was selected for further tests.

Results of the second approach to decrease the cooling time of the reaction and consequently the size of TiC particulates are shown now. Different methods were tested to implement this concept, the application of compressed cold air and argon into the reaction chamber and increasing the aluminium content in the initial mixture of reactants.

The former showed to be difficult to implement and furthermore did not provide any apparent decrease in the TiC particulates. It was difficult to know the precise moment of the end of the reaction and therefore when to introduce the cold fluid into the chamber without disrupting the synthesis. The increase in the amount of aluminium in the initial mixture of Ti, C and Al powders resulted in a better approach. It was seen that the higher the aluminium content the smaller the size of the TiC particulates created. This is thought to be related to the increase in the heat dissipation capacity of the mixture as well as the decrease in the number of Ti and C atoms available that may diffuse into the TiC nuclei during the reaction. This option had a clear limit though. Above an amount of 40% of aluminium powders in the initial mixture, the reaction between Ti and C was no longer auto-propagated and the SHS synthesis did not proceed correctly. Eventually, the master alloy was prepared in the conditions that led to the lowest TiC particulates size, i.e. by using Ti powder of 45μm and by incorporating 40% of aluminium into the initial mixture of Ti and black carbon powders. Fig. 6c shows a typical microstructure of the obtained powders. Small and large particulates with different shapes may be seen but most of the TiC particulates present a spherical shape and size lower than 500nm.

As can be seen in Fig. 8, the study of the size distribution of the samples confirmed that most of the particulates were submicrometre-sized even though the presence of particulates larger than 1μm may be appreciated. 47.3% of the particulates presented a size lower than 500nm and only 22.4% of the particulates are bigger than 1μm.

Fig. 8.

Size distribution of “second generation” TiC particulates obtained with Ti powder with an average size of 45μm and 40% of aluminium in the initial mixture of Al/Ti/C.

(0.05MB). of the TiC reinforced magnesium alloy

Fig. 9 shows SEM images of the microstructure of the TiC reinforced magnesium alloy. It is appreciated that the border between the metal and the particulates is clean, there seems to be not any chemical reaction between both phases. Individual particulates can be seen both at the grain boundaries and within the grains. There are also small clusters that are located in the boundaries together with other typical secondary phases of the alloy. Stir casting process is known to help disperse ceramic particulates within the liquid metal but it may also create porosity and defects within the melt. The existence of agglomerations and increase of porosity is thought to be the main reason to explain the loss of properties appreciated when the incorporation of more than 1wt.% particulates is tried. In fact, the improvement of properties shown by the samples containing 1wt.% of particulates is really low in comparison with the sample with only 0.2wt.%. The AM60+TiC 0.2wt.% samples present an increase of 5% in yield stress, 10% in UTS and up to 30% in terms of ductility when compared to the reference non-reinforced alloy: This increase is much limited when higher TiC contents are tried to be incorporated.

Fig. 9.

SEM images of the microstructure of the TiC reinforced magnesium alloy.

3.1.2Mechanical properties

Table 3 provides the results of the tensile tests of specimens containing AM60 alloy and different percentages of TiC particulates incorporated to the matrix through the stir casting process. Results of non-reinforced AM60 alloy obtained with the same mould and casting parameters are provided for comparison purposes.

Table 3.

Mechanical properties of submicron reinforced AM60 alloy. Standard deviation values are provided in parenthesis.

Materialsa  Yield stress (MPa)  Ultimate tensile strength (MPa)  Elongation (%) 
AM60 (reference)  106.25 (20.81)  193.00 (34.26)  7.25 (3.23) 
AM60+TiC 0.2wt.%  111.67 (4.95)  214.67 (24.26)  9.67 (2.83) 
AM60+TiC 1wt.%  118.00 (10.50)  227.00 (6.00)  9.43 (0.46) 
AM60+TiC 1.5wt.%  109.27 (17.76)  200.05 (26.34)  6.50 (2.87) 

All samples cast by gravity casting at 700°C into a metallic mould.

The analysis of the values points out that the addition of TiC particulates provides and improvement of properties as foreseen. Adding only 0.2% of particulates leads to an increase in around 5% in the mechanical strength and 30% in the ductility of the alloy. The mechanical strength further increases when the amount of particulates is increased up to 1wt.% even though the ductility value presents a slight decrease and the samples containing 1.5wt.% of TiC present worse results, even lower than those obtained with 0.2wt.%. On the other hand, the analysis of the microstructures shows that the TiC particulates induce a decrease in the size of the magnesium grain. These results are in agreement with works based on submicrometre and ano reinforced magnesium alloys.

In contrast to composites with particulates larger than 1μm, the ductility of the material seems to increase. The presence of TiC particulates leads to a decrease in the grain size and introduce stress fields due to the mismatch in CTE. They may also act as barriers to the movement of the dislocations through the phenomenon known as Orowan strengthening that explains that dislocations cannot advance due to the presence of well dispersed hard phases that must be overpassed and therefore act as barriers to their free movement. The presence of the dispersed particles may also induce the creation of cleavage cracks that may dissipate stress concentrations near the crack front.

These positive effects seem to fade when the content of TiC particulates overcomes 1wt.%. This may be related to porosity of the samples due to the incorporation of oxides during the stir casting process of such composites.

3.2Environmental analysis3.2.1Evaluation of case study A: component manufacturing based on magnesium alloy

Table 4 shows results concerning the environmental implications associated with the alloy production stage. On the one hand, it can be seen that in most of impact indicators, the process to produce magnesium (Pidgeon) has higher percentage when compared to the process carried out in the Norwegian plant. In particular, the climate change category shows a higher impact in the case of magnesium production by the Pidgeon process. This result can be associated with the source of energy required for the Pidgeon process. Fig. 10 shows the network for both process (Norwegian plant and Pidgeon process) containing the steps that contribute to the total CO2 kg eq. In order to highlight the main product, the network's products are partially shown with a cut-off of node below 0.6%.

Table 4.

Results on environmental impact for the primary alloy production (aluminium and magnesium).

Impact category  Units  Aluminium production  Magnesium production (Norwegian plant)  Magnesium production (Pidgeon process) 
Climate change  kg CO2 eq  11.89  22.60  85.41 
Ozone depletion  kg CFC-11 eq  7.14×10−7  3.13×10°5  7.24×10−7 
Terrestrial acidification  kg SO2eq  0.047  0.025  0.126 
Freshwater eutrophication  kg P eq  0.005  0.0006  0.009 
Marine eutrophication  kg N eq  0.002  0.006  0.015 
Human toxicity  kg 1,4-DB eq  0.372  0.070  0.707 
Photochemical oxidant formation  kg NMVOC  0.028  0.040  0.064 
Particulate matter formation  kg PM10 eq  0.023  0.008  0.043 
Terrestrial ecotoxicity  kg 1,4-DB eq  5.98×10−4  8.5×10°5  4.31×10−4 
Freshwater ecotoxicity  kg 1,4-DB eq  0.002  0.0007  0.0030 
Marine ecotoxicity  kg 1,4-DB eq  0.007  0.001  0.005 
Ionising radiation  kBq U235 eq  3.040  0.412  0.745 
Agricultural land occupation  m20.021  1.908  0.036 
Urban land occupation  m20.025  0.022  0.165 
Natural land transformation  m2  −3.85×10−5  1.00×10−4  6.40×10−4 
Water depletion  m3  321.13  15.94  21.46 
Fossil depletion  kg oil eq  0.017  0.002  0.120 
Fig. 10.

Network of products that contribute the total CO2 eq of the magnesium production: (a) Pidgeon process (b) Norwegian plant. In order to highlight the main product, the network's products are partially shown with a cut-off of node below 0.6%.


Thus, it can be observed that main contribution for both processes is focused on the electricity production where the main difference in terms of CO2 eq. can be found in this point. This is corroborated when the climate change category of electricity production for both routes are compared and evaluated by the same method so far used (RECIPE). The CO2 eq. emission per kWh of the Pidgeon process is 3 times higher than that emitted by the Norwegian plant, which leads to higher impact in terms of the climate change category.

The result above is consistent with the results of the study carried out by Simone et al. [33,40], which mention that the emissions from upstream in the Pidgeon process are attributed to the energy-intensive production. In particular, ferrosilicon (FeSi) is considered to be the largest contributor to overall emissions since a high amount energy (electricity) is used for its production. These authors also conclude that when the primary magnesium is obtained from electrolysis process, less GHG are emitted when compared to the Pidgeon process.

A similar analysis can be applied to the aluminium production process to explain why it reflects lower value of CO2 eq. when compared to both processes to produce magnesium previously studied. As the magnesium produced by the Norwegian plant shows to have around 65% of indicators lower than aluminium production technology, the magnesium technology through the electrolysis method is the more suitable to obtain this light metal to be used in the component manufacturing.

Based on this premise, the magnesium through Norwegian plant has been considered for environmental modelling of the magnesium component manufacturing. Thus, and as observed in Fig. 11a, the manufacturing process of non-reinforced magnesium component shows greater CO2 eq. (climate change indicator) when compared to the aluminium component. This result is due to the magnesium alloy production with the higher energy consumption. In fact, when the environmental modelling was analysed for each stage, the alloy magnesium production phase resulted to have higher environmental burden than the die casting process for all indicators (disaggregated results are not shown here).

Fig. 11.

(a) Results on environmental impact categories for non-reinforced component manufacturing, (b) Environmental burdens associated with the different stages of the component manufacturing based on magnesium alloy reinforced with submicrometre-sized particles.


Nevertheless, the opposite occurs for most other impact indicators when comparing the magnesium component through Norwegian plant with aluminium. This corroborates that magnesium would be a good candidate among lightweight materials for the automotive industry.

3.2.2Evaluation of case study B: component manufacturing based on magnesium alloy reinforced with submicrometre-sized particles

The results in previous section allow concluding that the process for magnesium alloy production has a significant influence in the life cycle of a vehicle component based on magnesium. Under this scenario, the environmental modelling described in this section also considers that the magnesium metal produced from electrolysis method to be used in the magnesium alloy, since, the process for manufacturing the component, using magnesium produced by Norks Hydro, would have a lower CO2 eq. emissions compared to the Pidgeon process.

Thus, Fig. 11b depicts the environmental results of the three stages for vehicle component manufacturing using the magnesium alloy reinforced with submicrometre-sized particles: Al/(TiC 1wt.%) synthesis stage, the mixing process and the component manufacturing. Firstly, it can be observed that the mixing step reveals higher percentages in all environmental categories. This is consistent with results shown in previous section, since, the mixing system stage considers the environmental burden due to the magnesium alloy production stage and, as explained above, this stage provokes a high environmental impact. By contrast, the synthesis of Al/(TiC 1wt.%) shows lower percentages along the environmental indicators.

One may think that this is not the expected result, because of the use of submicrometre materials, such as submicrometre-sized titanium could have impacts in terms of toxicity. Although elemental titanium is of a low order of toxicity, laboratory animals (rats) exposed to titanium compounds via inhalation have developed small-localized areas of dark-coloured dust deposits in the lungs. Moreover, an excessive exposure in humans may lead to neuro-inflammation, further brain injury with a spatial recognition memory and loco-motor activity impairment [41]. Thus, it is important to highlight that the amount used in the magnesium alloy reinforced with submicrometre-sized particles is too small to determine the environmental implications through the methodology proposed in this study. In fact, in order to determine the potential environmental risks caused by the use of these materials, a further environmental modelling should be developed, in which, the environmental effects should be analysed by means of a particular LCA at submicrometre scale, taking into account the chemical and biological interactions of submicrometre-particles with their surroundings.

In general, it can be said that, besides the positive effect of the Al/(TiC 1wt.%) on mechanical properties, the incorporation of the submicrometre particles into matrix magnesium alloy has a low environmental impact when compared to other stages involved in the manufacturing process of the reinforced magnesium alloy component. However, major technological progresses are needed to develop a process to produce primary magnesium with minimum CO2 emissions considering even a magnesium recycling process.

3.2.3Comparison of case A and B

After the analysis of each case study, Fig. 12 shows the comparison of both cases, the environmental results for one component manufactured based on reinforced magnesium alloy (case A) and one component manufactured based on aluminium alloy (case B).

Fig. 12.

Comparison of the environmental results obtained for case A (one component manufactured based on reinforced magnesium alloy) and case B (one component manufactured based on aluminium alloy).


As it can be seen, it is not possible to conclude which case study is more environmentally friendly, since this conclusion would depend on the indicator analysed. Nevertheless, it can be summarised that except five environmental indicators (climate change, marine eutrophication, ionising radiation, agricultural land occupation and natural transformation), the rest reveal that the component manufactured using the aluminium alloy has a higher impact when compared to magnesium. The difference is particularly remarkable in case of freshwater eutrophication, human toxicity, terrestrial and marine ecotoxicity, where the impact associated with the reinforced magnesium component is approximately lower 20% than the impact of the aluminium component.

Nevertheless, one of the main indicators that are considered in the road transport is the climate change. In this study, the reinforced magnesium alloy has a higher impact compared to the component manufacturing using aluminium. For that reason, it has been necessary to consider including the study of the use phase, in which, the fuel saving caused by the lightweight component, can reduce the CO2 eq. emissions and therefore determine if the higher environmental impact associated with the magnesium component manufacturing is offset.

3.2.4Use phase scenario analysis

As observed in Table 4, the results show that magnesium production technologies lead higher CO2 eq. when compared to the aluminium production, which is mainly attributed to the high energy consumption generating considerable GHG emissions. Therefore, the special interest and contribution of this work is focused in increasing and broadening the applications of magnesium (as a lightweight material) with improved mechanical properties in the automotive sector.

It is known that the amount of fuel and emission savings during the use phase depends largely on the weight reduction resulting from the material substitution. Thereby, from this basis of calculation form based on the fuel consumption savings, the above statement can be evidenced in Fig. 13. There the difference between CO2 eq. emissions respect to the reference component is depicted versus the driven millage of a car with an assumed lifetime of 200,000km (the reference case shown in the figure is represented as the aluminium baseline (dotted line)). A point around 28,000km can be observed at which the CO2 eq. emissions are compensated with respect to the component manufacturing including the production of metal alloy. This point can be considered as a break-even point.

Fig. 13.

CO2 eq. savings in the use phase of the generic body joint component respect to the aluminium component (Reference).


From this point, the use of a lightweight component led to negative values of Δ kg CO2 eq., which indicates benefits from the environmental point of view. This is an important result indicating that the use of reinforced magnesium in automotive components not only improves the mechanical properties, but it mitigates the environmental burden in terms of climate change.

The above results are comparable with the Simone et al.’s study [33]. They raise several scenarios for primary magnesium production based on similar technologies, where their high environmental burdens are compensated during the use stage of the vehicle component manufactured with magnesium alloy.

Nevertheless, it is worth noting that obtaining a break-even point at low mileage driven depends considerably of initial conditions. In other words, the CO2 eq. impact attributed to the component manufacturing (intersection point on the axis of ordinates) will be offset in a reasonable mileage depending on the weight reduction in the vehicle by using a magnesium component as well as of the novel technology for its manufacture. Thus, the environmental burden in its life cycle (from cradle-to-gate including the use phase) will be balanced.


This study analysed simultaneously the technical and environmental performance of a novel developed magnesium alloy reinforced with submicrometre-sized TiC particles to produce automotive components. The AM60/(TiC 1wt.%) master compound was produced through self-propagating high-temperature synthesis (SHS) process and embedded in magnesium alloy by a mechanical method. In general, the study showed positive results in both perspectives, the technical and environmental evaluations.

On the one hand, the technical evaluation analysed the most representative physical and mechanical properties. In case of physical properties, the results confirmed that during the SHS self-propagation reaction no presence of any loose of Ti or C particles or any other secondary components was found. The submicrometre-sized TiC production, a good size distribution of the particles (as was shown by SEM and XRD analysis), was achieved. In depth, most of them were submicrometre-sized lower than 500 nanometres (more than 47% of the particles) and spherical shaped. Only 22.4% of the particles obtained were bigger than 1μm. In addition, results also confirmed the good performance of the material since it was shown that the addition of up to 1wt.% of TiC increased 11% the yield stress, 18% the ultimate tensile strength and 30% the ductility of the material with regards to the case of initial magnesium alloy.

On the other hand, the environmental evaluation revealed that the incorporation of this submicrometre-particle into a matrix magnesium alloy had a low environmental impact when compared to other stages involved in the manufacturing process of the component, in particular, the magnesium production. This latter showed highest environmental impact when compared to the aluminium process, more than 70% of the indicators in the Pidgeon method.

Nevertheless, comparing the final automotive component, made of reinforced magnesium through the electrolysis method using the alternative R134 gas cover, with the aluminium component, the results revealed that the environmental impact associated with the reinforced magnesium component showed lower environmental (70% of the indicators analysed).

However, this was not observed in the case of the climate change indicator, where the production of the reinforced magnesium component entailed higher amount of CO2 eq. than in the case of the aluminium component (around 90%). Therefore, the study included the use phase of the component where the lower weight of this component results in fuel saving in the car and, consequently, an associated reduction in the CO2 eq., which offsets the environmental impact in terms of climate change induced in the magnesium production stage.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


The research leading to these results has been received funding form the European Union Seventh Framework Programme(FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement n 314582 - EFEVE project. The authors thank the project partners for providing support to this research.

Commission, E..
Trends in Transport.
European Commission.
White Paper: Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system.
European Commission.
Council report of the European Council of Helsinki on the strategy on the integration of environment and sustainable development into transport policy.
Y.S.H. Najjar, O.H. Ghazal, K.J.M. Al-Khishali.
Performance improvement of green cars by using variable-geometry engines.
J Energy Inst, 87 (2014), pp. 393-400
J.M. Herreros, et al.
Enhancing selective catalytic reduction of NOx with alternative reactants/promoters.
Chem Eng J, 252 (2014), pp. 47-54
M.N. Nabi, M.S. Akhter, M.M. Zaglul Shahadat.
Improvement of engine emissions with conventional diesel fuel and diesel–biodiesel blends.
Bioresour Technol, 97 (2006), pp. 372-378
G. Ferreira, et al.
Effect of the inner two-phase flow on the performance of an industrial twin-fluid nozzle with an internal mixing chamber.
At Sprays, 19 (2009), pp. 873-884
A.J. Martín, et al.
Chapter 15 – Recent advances in fuel cells for transport and stationary applications.
Renewable hydrogen technologies, pp. 361-380
M. Larsson, et al.
Energy system analysis of the implications of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles in the Swedish road transport system.
Int J Hydrogen Energy, 40 (2015), pp. 11722-11729
W. Sierzchula, et al.
The competitive environment of electric vehicles: an analysis of prototype and production models.
Environ Innov Soc Transit, 2 (2012), pp. 49-65
P. Jochem, S. Babrowski, W. Fichtner.
Assessing CO2 emissions of electric vehicles in Germany in 2030.
Transp Res Part A, 78 (2015), pp. 68-83
M. Goede, et al.
Super Light Car – lightweight construction thanks to a multi-material design and function integration.
Eur Transp Res Rev, 1 (2009), pp. 5-10
V. Ferreira, et al.
Lightweight automotive components based on nanodiamond-reinforced aluminium alloy: a technical and environmental evaluation.
Diam Relat Mater, (2019), pp. 92
K.K. Alaneme, A.V. Fajemisin, N.B. Maledi.
Development of aluminium-based composites reinforced with steel and graphite particles: structural, mechanical and wear characterization.
J Mater Res Technol, (2018),
Y. Li, et al.
Experimental study of glass-fiber mat thermoplastic material impact properties and lightweight automobile body analysis.
Mater Des, 25 (2004), pp. 579-585
A. Jambor, M. Beyer.
New cars — new materials.
Mater Des, 18 (1997), pp. 203-209
R. Kawalla, et al.
Magnesium semi-finished products for vehicle construction.
Arch Civil Mech Eng, 8 (2008), pp. 93-101
M. Gupta, W.L.E. Wong.
Magnesium-based nanocomposites: lightweight materials of the future.
Mater Charact, 105 (2015), pp. 30-46
R. Gao, et al.
Fabrication of fibrous szaibelyite with hierarchical structure superhydrophobic coating on AZ31 magnesium alloy for corrosion protection.
Chem Eng J, 241 (2014), pp. 352-359
Z. She, et al.
Researching the fabrication of anticorrosion superhydrophobic surface on magnesium alloy and its mechanical stability and durability.
Chem Eng J, 228 (2013), pp. 415-424
B. Anasori, E.A.N. Caspi, M.W. Barsoum.
Fabrication and mechanical properties of pressureless melt infiltrated magnesium alloy composites reinforced with TiC and Ti2AlC particles.
Mater Sci Eng A, 618 (2014), pp. 511-522
A. Bakkar, et al.
Microstructure, wear, and corrosion characterization of high TiC content Inconel 625 matrix composites.
J Mater Res Technol, (2018),
R. Casati, M. Vedani.
Metal matrix composites reinforced by nano-particles—a review.
Metals, 4 (2014), pp. 65
P. Koltun, A. Tharumarajah, S. Ramakrishnan.
Life cycle environmental impact of magnesium automotive components.
Essential readings in magnesium technology, John Wiley & Sons Inc., (2014), pp. 175-180
M. Hakamada, et al.
Life cycle inventory study on magnesium alloy substitution in vehicles.
Energy, 32 (2007), pp. 1352-1360
International Organization for Standardization.
ISO 14040:2006 – Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment – Principles and Framework.
A. Aranda-Usón, et al.
Phase change material applications in buildings: an environmental assessment for some Spanish climate severities.
Sci Total Environ, 444 (2013), pp. 16-25
S.M. Al-Salem, S. Evangelisti, P. Lettieri.
Life cycle assessment of alternative technologies for municipal solid waste and plastic solid waste management in the Greater London area.
Chem Eng J, 244 (2014), pp. 391-402
G. Ferreira, et al.
Environmental analysis for identifying challenges to recover used reinforced refractories in industrial furnaces.
J Clean Prod, 88 (2015), pp. 242-253
G. Mori, W. Adelhartdt.
Stoffmengenflüsse und Energiebedarf bei der Gewinniung ausgewählter minehltter mineralicher Rohstoffe: Teilstudie Aluminium.
Geologisches Jahrbuch, (1998),
European Aluminium Association.
Life Cycle Inventory data for aluminium production and transformation processes in Europe.
International Magnesium Association.
Magnesium lifecycle analysis (LCA).
S. Ehrenberger, H. Dieringa, H.E. Friedrich.
Life cycle assessment of magnesium components in vehicle construction.
German Aerospace Centre e.V., (2013),
J.Ö. Haagensen, B. Opheim, H. Westengen.
Life cycle inventory magnesium. Results reliability and how use them in the automotive industry.
Ganzheitliche Betrachtung im Automobilbau: Rohstoffe-Produktion-Nutzung-Verwertung, pp. 175-182
Minior Metals Trade Association (MMTA).
Magnesium metal market overview.
World Aluminium.
Primary aluminium production.
K. Amundsen, et al.
Magnesium in Ullmann's encyclopedia of industrial chemistry.
Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, (2000),
E.J. Vinarcik.
High integrity die casting processes.
Wiley, (2002),
C. Koffler, K. Rohde-Brandenburger.
On the calculation of fuel savings through lightweight design in automotive life cycle assessments.
Int J Life Cycle Assess, 15 (2010), pp. 128-135
S. Ehrenberger, H.E. Friedrich.
Assessment of greenhouse gas emissions of magnesium use in transport.
Light metal age, (2014), pp. 50-53
M. Czajka, et al.
Toxicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles in central nervous system.
Toxicol In Vitro, 29 (2015), pp. 1042-1052
Copyright © 2019. Brazilian Metallurgical, Materials and Mining Association
Journal of Materials Research and Technology

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
Cookies policy
To improve our services and products, we use cookies (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here.