Journal Information
Vol. 8. Issue 5.
Pages 3726-3732 (September - October 2019)
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 8. Issue 5.
Pages 3726-3732 (September - October 2019)
Original Article
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.06.032
Open Access
Physical and thermal properties of treated sugar palm/glass fibre reinforced thermoplastic polyurethane hybrid composites
A. Atiqaha,b,
Corresponding author

Corresponding author.
, M. Jawaidb, S.M. Sapuanb,c, M.R. Ishakd, M.N.M. Ansaria, R.A. Ilyasb,c
a Institute of Power Engineering, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Kajang 43000, Selangor, Malaysia
b Laboratory of Biocomposite Technology, Institute of Tropical Forestry and Forest Products (INTROP), Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
c Advanced Engineering Materials and Composites Research Centre, Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
d Department of Aerospace Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Full Text
Download PDF
Figures (5)
Show moreShow less
Tables (3)
Table 1. Previous worked working on combined alkaline–silane for natural fiber treatment.
Table 2. Formulation of untreated and treated SP/G/TPU hybrid composites.
Table 3. Thermogravimetric (TGA) results obtained for UTSP, TNSP, TSSP and TNSSP hybrid composites.
Show moreShow less

Lignocellulosic/natural fibre and glass fibre-based hybrid composites are considered as high-performance composites but very limited numbers of researchers worked on substituting sugar palm fibre with glass fibre in hybrid composites. The main goal of this research to investigate the effect of various treatment such as 6% alkaline (TNSP), 2% silane (TSSP) and combined 6% alkaline–2% silane (TNSSP) on physical and thermal properties of sugar palm/glass/thermoplastic polyurethane hybrid composites were carried out. Taking into account of physical properties, the combined alkaline–silane treated hybrid composites (TNSSP) showed the lowest density, thickness swelling, and water absorption as compared to other composites. The good thermal stability was discovered for treated as compared to untreated sugar palm fibre based composites (UTSP). Overall, the treated sugar palm/glass/thermoplastic polyurethane hybrid composites suitable for the fabrication of automotive components.

Sugar palm fibre
Glass fibre
Hybrid composites
Physical properties
Thermal properties
Full Text

All across the countries, natural fibres have become well-known as an important material in many industries application. There are several types of established natural fibres such as sugar palm, kenaf, coconut husk, jute, sisal, curaua, flax and so on. Talking about sugar palm, its trees are widely grown and its fibres are largely abandoned in many Asian countries mainly in Malaysia. This opportunity has gathered many researchers’ attention to study further these sugar palm fibres as a potential material to be used as reinforcement in polymer composites [1,2].

As the research growth, sugar palm fibre has shown to have many significant advantages to be considered. As in environment, sugar palm fibre is famous in low priced, biodegradable, plentiful in nature and so on. While in term of properties, sugar palm fibre has shown low density, good mechanical strength, and also good in thermal properties [3]. Apart from those mentioned above, sugar palm fibre also has some disadvantages such as non-adhesive with polymer matrices, high moisture, low modulus and low strength in properties. Therefore, certain methods like chemical treatment were employed in order to improve the attraction between both constituents in the composite [2,4].

After witnessing the disadvantages of the sugar palm fibre being improved by the chemical treatment to enhance fibre’s properties, hybridization is next to be used in this research study. In this study, glass fibre reinforced thermoplastic polyurethane is hybridizing in the same matrix with sugar palm fibre in order to improve its properties. This current method of reinforcement in hybrid form is used in composites for the purpose of achieving superior physical properties as well as dimensional stability. There are several factors that influenced the performance of the hybrid composites such as the matrix itself, the interfacial bonding (between fibre and matrix), composite’s shape and length, and the fraction volume of both fibres [5]. There are some works reported that done on fibre treatment and hybridize with glass fibre to enhance the properties of the hybrid composites such as kenaf [6,7], flax [8], basalt [8], sisal [9], Palmyra palm leaf [10], coir [11], etc.

Furthermore, the previous works that investigated with combination treatment of alkaline and silane as shown in Table 1 such as kenaf [12,13], sisal [14], bamboo [15], hemp [16] also showed the good properties of composites. In this research, fibre modification with NaOH or mercerization process can defibrillate the surface of the sugar palm fibre, so that TPU can hold further into the fibre to enhance both physical adhesion. Other than that, sugar palm fibre is treated with silane mixture in order to change the structural and chemical composition in the fibre and eventually can improve the fibre’s properties. Lastly, alkaline and silane mixture are mixed together as for the fibres treatment. There are few or no attempt on sugar palm fibre surface modification with hybridization of glass fibre. So, the main objective of this research was to investigate the effect of untreated and treated sugar palm fibre incorporated in glass fibre reinforced TPU composites on physical and thermal properties.

Table 1.

Previous worked working on combined alkaline–silane for natural fiber treatment.

Matrix  Reinforcement  Fibre treatment  References 
Polypropylene  Kenaf fibre  Alkaline–silane  [12] 
Polylactic acid  Kenaf  Alkaline–silane  [13] 
Polylactic acid  Wheat husk  Alkaline–silane  [17] 
Polylactic acid  Sisal  Alkaline–silane  [14] 
Polylactic acid  Hemp  Alkaline–silane  [16] 
Polylactic acid  Empty fruit bunch  Alkaline–silane  [18] 
Polylactic acid  Ramie  Alkaline–silane  [19] 
Epoxy  Bamboo  Alkaline–silane  [15] 
Phenolics  Kenaf and pineapple leaf  Alkaline–silane  [20] 
Polylactic acid  Phormium tenax  Alkaline–silane  [21] 
Polyvinyl alcohol  Oil palm empty fruit bunches fibre  Alkaline–silane  [22] 
–  Hemp  Alkaline–silane  [23] 
Epoxy  Bamboo  Alkaline–silane  [24] 
Thermoplastic polyurethane  Flax  Alkaline–silane  [25] 
Polylactic acid  Jute fibre  Alkaline–silane  [26] 
Polylactic Acid  Corn fibre  Alkaline–silane  [27] 
Polypropylene  Kenaf  Alkaline–silane  [28] 
Nanoclay  Banana  Alkaline–silane  [29] 
–  Phormium tenax  Alkaline–silane  [30] 

The hybrid composites consisted sugar palm fibre, glass fibre and thermoplastic polyurethane. Sugar palm fibres were collected from local plantation at Jempol, Negeri Sembilan. Glass fibres and TPU were supplied in the form of mill seized of 6 mm and pellet form by Innovative Pultrusion Sdn. Bhd.

2.2Treatment of sugar palm fibre

Sugar palm fibre was initially immersed in huge tap water for several days then rinsed using water and dried in the ambient temperature for 7 days. The SPFs were crushed into small size of 5–10 mm using plastic crusher machine this due to the physical attributes of the SPFs is very hard to cut using the usual machine cutter. Subsequently then were transferred to pulverize machine followed by siever machine in order to get the size of 150–250 µm. Then the SPFs were undergoing the next process of fibre modification as follows:

Alkaline treatment: The SPFs were treated for 3 h using alkali (NaOH) solutions with a concentration of 6%. The alkaline solutions were used to remove the surface impurities and hemicelluloses within the fibre. Next, the SPFs were repeatedly cleaned using distilled water then dried at 25 °C for 72 h and oven dried at 60 °C for 24 h [6].

Silane treatment: The 2 wt.% APS (weight percentage compared to the fibre) was dissolved for hydrolysis in a mixture of water–ethanol were employed on sugar palm fibre for 3 h then washed and kept in air for 72 h. Lastly, the sugar palm fibre was oven dried at 60 °C for 24 h [31]. The chemical reaction of alkaline (1) [32] and silane treatment (2–3) [33] are given as follows.

Fiber-OH + NaOH → Fiber-O-Na+ + H2O
CH2CHSi(OH)3 + Fiber-OH→CH2CHSi(OH)2O-Fiber + H2O

Combined alkaline–silane treatment: First, sugar palm fibres were treated with alkaline treatment as described in the alkaline treatment step. Then, the sugar palm fibres were treated by silane treatment as described in the silane treatment step.

The untreated and treated sugar palm fibre/glass reinforced thermoplastic polyurethane was fabricated using melt-mixing compounding followed by hot pressing moulding. The weight fraction of the sugar palm fibre, glass fibre and TPU is shown in Table 2. The hybrid composites specimens including untreated, alkaline treated, silane treated, alkaline–silane treated sugar palm fibre. The fibres reinforcement with TPU was mixed together using an internal mixer with temperature 190 °C, 11 min, 40 rpm before the batch were hot pressed with the preheat 7 min and full pressed 10 min, temperature 190 °C and cooling press for 5 min with temperature 25 °C [34].

Table 2.

Formulation of untreated and treated SP/G/TPU hybrid composites.

Type of composites  TPU (wt. %)  SP (wt. %)  G (wt. %)  Fiber treatment 
UTSPP  60  30  10  Untreated 
TNSP  60  30  10  6% alkaline 
TSSP  60  30  10  2% silane 
TNSSP  60  30  10  6% alkaline–2% silane 

The developed untreated and treated hybrid composites were weighed in the air using digital weighing scale and in water using the density determination balance (XS205 Mettler Toledo). Ten samples were cut into a square shape with the dimension 10 × 10 × 3 mm. The test was performed according to ASTM D4018 standards at 27 °C. The density was then recorded for all samples and presented in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Density of untreated and treated hybrid SP/G reinforced TPU composites.

3.2Water absorption and thickness swelling

Ten replicates of untreated and treated SP/G reinforced TPU composites were oven dried at 60 °C for 24 h. The specimens with the dimension of 20 × 20 × 3 mm were then immersed in distilled water at ambient temperature. Then, each sample was removed from the bath and carefully dried with an absorbent paper before weighing. The weight gain, Wg due to water absorption was calculated using Eq. (1):

Wt is the weight of the specimens after a certain time of immersion.

W0 is the initial weight dried specimens.

Furthermore, the thickness swelling, Tg was calculated using Eq. (2):

3.3Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA)

The thermal stability of the TPU and sugar palm fibre/glass reinforced hybrid composites was determined by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), using a PerkinElmer Pyris 1. TGA analysis was performed under a nitrogen atmosphere at a flow rate of 20 ml/min to avoid oxidation. The untreated and treated SP/G samples weighed 10–15 mg. The heating rate was maintained 20 °C/min as the samples were heated to the temperature of −45 to 800 °C.

4Results and discussion4.1Physical properties4.1.1Density

The density of untreated and treated SP/G hybrid composites is shown in Fig. 1. From Fig. 1, the density of combined alkaline–silane treated showed 1.25 g/cm3 followed by silane treated, alkaline treated and untreated. The order of decreasing value of density SP/G hybrid composites are as follows: UTSP < TNSP < TSSP < TNSSP. Reduction in density of treated fibres was also reported in previous work [35]. In the study, they investigated a study on the effect of fibre treatment using alkaline and silane showed the density of treated fibre led to the lower density of composites as compared untreated [35].

4.1.2Thickness swelling

The thickness swelling of untreated and treated hybrid SP/G composites was performed as in Fig. 2. From the thickness swelling curve, it is observed that the hybrid samples absorbed water content increased with increasing immersion time. The order of decreasing the value of thickness swelling SP/G hybrid composites are as follows: UTSP < TNSP < TSSP < TNSSP. The most significant improvement of 21% thickness swelling is combined alkaline–silane treatment as compared to other treated hybrid composites. This is due to cleaning by using alkaline treatment which removed the waxy like substances and the impurities on the fibre surface rougher [16,36]. This lead to enhance fibre–matrix interaction resulting from the fewer pores and void space that prevent adsorption of moisture from the sugar palm fibre. Similar findings have been informed in the literature, where it is reported that the thickness swelling of alkaline and silane treated of wood fibre reinforced recycle polymer composites was minimum [37].

Fig. 2.

Thickness swelling of untreated and treated hybrid SP/G reinforced TPU composites.

4.1.3Water absorption

Fig. 3 shows the combined alkaline–silane is beneficial for the moisture resistance of hybrid SP/G composites. The order of decreasing value of water uptake SP/G hybrid composites are as follows: UTSP < TNSP < TSSP < TNSSP. The moisture absorption decreases considerably by employing fibre treatments on sugar palm fibre. In the case of untreated hybrid composites (UTSP), higher water absorption, 9.27% may be due to poor wettability of untreated sugar palm fibre to TPU matrix. At the first stage of alkaline treatment, the impurities that adhere to and hemicelluloses part were removed from sugar palm fibre. Then, the silane treatment prevents the hydroxyl groups on the sugar palm fibre surface by inducing hydrophobic silanes groups [16,18]. The existence of the hydroxyl group origins from the moisture absorption properties. This combined treatment yielding the lowest water uptake value of as compared to TNSP and TSSP. Those fibre treatments lower the water absorption than those of untreated sugar palm fibre. Similarly, Abdullah and Ahmad [38] reported that water absorption of coir reinforced unsaturated polyester resin composites decreased with treated silane and alkaline treatment. The decrease of water absorption of natural fibre and its composites after alkaline and silane treatment was also reported by other researchers [15,17,37]. The concentration and time of treatment of fibres also influenced the water absorption of the hybrid composites.

Fig. 3.

Water absorption of untreated and treated hybrid SP/G reinforced TPU composites.

4.2Thermal properties4.2.1Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA)

Fig. 4 shows the results of the TGA obtained on the untreated and treated SP/G reinforced TPU composites. From Fig. 4, it can be seen that at a lower temperature, untreated hybrid composites showed the lowest weight loss followed by alkaline treated. This can be correlated to the higher moisture absorption of the hemicelluloses of the untreated sugar palm fibre as in Fig. 3. There are several works that reported that lignocellulosic fibres were not good bonding with polymers [30]. This is due to the existence of moisture in the multi-cellular parts or void spaces at fibre–matrix adhesion could be possibly weakening the bonding fibre–polymer [29]. The initial weight loss where the moisture starts for evaporate for UTSP, TNSP, TSSP and TNSSP are 156, 146, 132 and 138 °C, respectively. Bachtiar et al. [39] reported that initial mass loss took place around 56 °C and 165 °C for sugar palm fibre and alkaline treated sugar palm fibre reinforced HIPS composites.

Fig. 4.

Thermogravimetric (TGA) curves for UTSP, TNSP, TSSP and TNSSP hybrid composites.


The final degradation of UTSP, TNSP, TSSP and TNSSP of 534, 546, 678, and 440 °C indicated the weight loss reflects the quantity of residue. The UTSP has the lowest percentage of the final residue followed by TNSP, TSSP and TNSSP with the values of 13%, 15% and 16%. This indicates that combining alkaline and silane increases the percentage of final residue which can be suggested good thermal stability properties. Some researchers consider this is due to the removal of lignin after fibre treatment of natural fibre [13,30]. Though, based on TGA analysis that done by others, alkali treated sugar palm fibre were evaluated to leave about 5% more residue than untreated [39]. Nevertheless, it was found that when bamboo fibre pre-treated with alkaline, more weight loss as compared to single fibre treatment [40]. The TGA results of the neat, untreated and treated is summarized in Table 3.

Table 3.

Thermogravimetric (TGA) results obtained for UTSP, TNSP, TSSP and TNSSP hybrid composites.

Hybrid designation  Initial degradation temperature, IDT (°C)  Final degradation temperature, FDT (°C)  Final residue (%) 
UTSP  156  435  28.48 
TNSP  146  480  30.69 
TSSP  132  481  29.35 
TNSSP  138  507  32.02 

The results of derivative thermogravimetric (DTG) analysis evaluated on the untreated and treated SP/G reinforced TPU composites are demonstrated in Fig. 5. The peaks of the DTG curves is owed to the degradation temperature of each component of the hybrid composites. It had been observed that, three peaks resulted on the untreated SP/G composites. The first peak was higher than other treated SP/G composites due to the presence of water molecules in the hemicelluloses part of SP fibre [36]. Moreover, this could be possibly due to the void that existed on the SP/G specimens during fabrication process contribute the greater peak of DTG curve. Sugar palm fibre treated with combined alkaline–silane (TNSSP) decomposed at lower temperature than TSSP, TNSP and untreated hybrid composites. In engineering application, the initial peak of decomposition is important than following peaks at higher temperature [41].

Fig. 5.

Derivative thermogravimetric (TGA) curves for UTSP, TNSP, TSSP and TNSSP hybrid composites.


Sugar palm fibre was modified by alkaline, silane and combined alkaline–silane to enhance the adhesion bonding between sugar palm fibre with glass-reinforced TPU hybrid composites. The effects of various treatments on sugar palm fibre were characterized by physical and thermal properties. When tested at RT, the lowest density, thickness swelling and water absorption recorded for hybrid SP/G composites showed that TNSSP has the lowest density value followed by TSSP, TNSP and UTSP, respectively. The TGA analysis showed that the TNSSP had the lowest residue as the combined alkaline–silane treatment. The untreated, TNSP and TSSP had residue percentage of 29%, 30% and 32%. The hybrid composite with combined alkaline–silane degrades at a slightly lower temperature as compared with alkaline treated and silane treated. This combination of silane and alkaline treatment at last showed a significantly good result of lower density, thickness swelling, water uptake and good thermal stability as compared to other mentioned treatment and can be proposed as potential fibre treatment mainly for sugar palm fibre in fabrication of automotive component.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


The authors are grateful for the financial support from Universiti Putra Malaysia through Putra grant no. GP-IPS/2015/9441501. The author would also like to thank the Ministry of Higher Education for the MyBrain15 scholarship.

S.M. Sapuan, M.R. Ishak, Z. Leman, R.A. Ilyas, M.R.M. Huzaifah.
Development of products from sugar palm trees (Arenga pinnata Wurb. Merr): a community project.
INTROPica, (2017), pp. 12-13
A. Atiqah, M. Jawaid, M.R. Ishak, S.M. Sapuan.
Effect of alkali and silane treatments on mechanical and interfacial bonding strength of sugar palm fibers with thermoplastic polyurethane.
Journal of natural fibers, 15 (2018), pp. 251-261
M.R. Ishak, S.M. Sapuan, Z. Leman, M.Z.A. Rahman, U.M.K. Anwar, J.P. Siregar.
Sugar palm (Arenga pinnata): its fibres, polymers and composites.
Carbohydr Polym, 91 (2013), pp. 699-710
A.A. Mohammed, D. Bachtiar, M.R.M. Rejab, X.X. Jiang, F.O. Abas, R.U. Abass, et al.
Effects of KMnO4 treatment on the flexural, impact, and thermal properties of sugar palm fiber-reinforced thermoplastic polyurethane composites.
JOM, 70 (2018), pp. 1326-1330
C. Dong.
Review of natural fibre-reinforced hybrid composites.
J Reinf Plast Compos, 37 (2018), pp. 331-348
A. Atiqah, M.A. Maleque, M. Jawaid, M. Iqbal.
Development of kenaf-glass reinforced unsaturated polyester hybrid composite for structural applications.
Compos B Eng, 56 (2014), pp. 68-73
A. Praveen Kumar, M. Nalla Mohamed.
A comparative analysis on tensile strength of dry and moisture absorbed hybrid kenaf/glass polymer composites.
J Ind Text, 47 (2018), pp. 2050-2073
S. Sathish, K. Kumaresan, L. Prabhu, N. Vigneshkumar.
Experimental investigation on volume fraction of mechanical and physical properties of flax and bamboo fibers reinforced hybrid epoxy composites.
Polym Polym Compos, 25 (2017), pp. 229-236
R.S. Rana, R. Purohit.
A Review on mechanical property of sisal glass fiber reinforced polymer composites.
Mater Today Proc, 4 (2017), pp. 3466-3476
D. Shanmugam, M. Thiruchitrambalam, R. Thirumurugan.
Continuous unidirectional palmyra palm leaf stalk fiber/glass—polyester composites: static and dynamic mechanical properties.
J Reinf Plast Compos, 33 (2014), pp. 836-850
M. Villalón, R. Salas-Zuñiga, U. Reyes-Zamora, R. Radillo, J.L. Reyes-Araiza, A. Manzano-Ramírez.
Effect on dynamic, quasi-static elastic moduli of glass fiber laminates.
Int J Green Nanotechnol Mater Sci Eng, 3 (2016), pp. 113-119
O.M.L. Asumani, R.G. Reid, R. Paskaramoorthy.
The effects of alkali–silane treatment on the tensile and flexural properties of short fibre non-woven kenaf reinforced polypropylene composites.
Compos A Appl Sci Manuf, 43 (2012), pp. 1431-1440
M.S. Huda, L.T. Drzal, A.K. Mohanty, M. Misra.
Effect of fiber surface-treatments on the properties of laminated biocomposites from poly (lactic acid) (PLA) and kenaf fibers.
Compos Sci Technol, 68 (2008), pp. 424-432
A. Orue, A. Jauregi, U. Unsuain, J. Labidi, A. Eceiza, A. Arbelaiz.
The effect of alkaline and silane treatments on mechanical properties and breakage of sisal fibers and poly(lactic acid)/sisal fiber composites.
Compos A Appl Sci Manuf, 84 (2016), pp. 186-195
P.K. Kushwaha, R. Kumar.
Studies on water absorption of bamboo‐epoxy composites: effect of silane treatment of mercerized bamboo.
J Appl Polym Sci, 115 (2010), pp. 1846-1852
M.A. Sawpan, K.L. Pickering, A. Fernyhough.
Effect of fibre treatments on interfacial shear strength of hemp fibre reinforced polylactide and unsaturated polyester composites.
Compos A Appl Sci Manuf, 42 (2011), pp. 1189-1196
T.P.T. Tran, J.-C. Bénézet, A. Bergeret.
Rice and Einkorn wheat husks reinforced poly(lactic acid) (PLA) biocomposites: effects of alkaline and silane surface treatments of husks.
Ind Crops Prod, 58 (2014), pp. 111-124
M. Abdelmouleh, S. Boufi, M.N. Belgacem, A. Dufresne, A. Gandini.
Modification of cellulose fibers with functionalized silanes: effect of the fiber treatment on the mechanical performances of cellulose–thermoset composites.
J Appl Polym Sci, 98 (2005), pp. 974-984
H.Y. Choi, J.S. Lee.
Effects of surface treatment of ramie fibers in a ramie/poly (lactic acid) composite.
Fibers Polym, 13 (2012), pp. 217-223
M. Asim, M. Jawaid, K. Abdan, M.R. Ishak.
Effect of alkali and silane treatments on mechanical and fibre-matrix bond strength of kenaf and pineapple leaf fibres.
J Bionic Eng, 13 (2016), pp. 426-435
M. Sarikanat.
The influence of oligomeric siloxane concentration on the mechanical behaviors of alkalized jute/modified epoxy composites.
J Reinf Plast Compos, 29 (2010), pp. 807-817
K.Y. Ching, C.Y. Chee, M. Afzan, L.Z. Kang, C.K. Eng.
Mechanical and thermal properties of chemical treated oil palm empty fruit bunches Fiber reinforced polyvinyl alcohol composite.
J Biobased Mater Bioenergy, 9 (2015), pp. 231-235
M.A. Sawpan, K.L. Pickering, A. Fernyhough.
Improvement of mechanical performance of industrial hemp fibre reinforced polylactide biocomposites.
Compos A Appl Sci Manuf, 42 (2011), pp. 310-319
V. Kumar, R. Kumar.
Dielectric and mechanical properties of alkali-and silane-treated bamboo-epoxy nanocomposites.
J Compos Mater, 46 (2012), pp. 3089-3101
U. Tayfun, M. Dogan, E. Bayramli.
Influence of surface modifications of flax fiber on mechanical and flow properties of thermoplastic polyurethane based eco-composites.
J Nat Fibers, 13 (2016), pp. 309-320
M.T. Zafar, S.N. Maiti, A.K. Ghosh.
Effect of surface treatment of jute fibers on the interfacial adhesion in poly (lactic acid)/jute fiber biocomposites.
Fibers Polym, 17 (2016), pp. 266-274
H. Luo, C. Zhang, G. Xiong, Y. Wan.
Effects of alkali and alkali/silane treatments of corn fibers on mechanical and thermal properties of its composites with polylactic acid.
Polym Compos, 37 (2016), pp. 3499-3507
L. Jin, W. Chunhong, H. Wenting, Y. Xinmin, R. Zilong.
Surface modification of kenaf Fiber and application of it on polypropylene composite.
Eng Plast Appl, 2 (2014), pp. 7
T.P. Mohan, K. Kanny.
Mechanical and thermal properties of nanoclay-treated banana fibers.
J Nat Fibers, (2017), pp. 1-9
D. Puglia, M. Monti, C. Santulli, F. Sarasini, I.M. De Rosa, J.M. Kenny.
Effect of alkali and silane treatments on mechanical and thermal behavior of Phormium tenax fibers.
Fibers Polym, 14 (2013), pp. 423-427
A. Atiqah, M. Jawaid, S.M. Sapuan, M.R. Ishak.
Effect of surface treatment on the mechanical properties of sugar Palm/Glass fiber-reinforced thermoplastic polyurethane hybrid composites.
BioResources, 13 (2017), pp. 1174-1188
J.Z. Vasquez, C.R.S. Patalud, P.M.O. Tarnate, G. Shelah, E.C. Escobar, C.C. Vaso.
Effect of alkali treatment on the mechanical, physical, and thermal properties of sweet sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] fibers.
Philipp EJ Appl Res Dev, 6 (2016), pp. 1-9
R. Agrawal, N.S. Saxena, K.B. Sharma, S. Thomas, M.S. Sreekala.
Activation energy and crystallization kinetics of untreated and treated oil palm fibre reinforced phenol formaldehyde composites.
Mater Sci Eng A, 277 (2000), pp. 77-82
M. Wang, X. Zhang, W. Zhang, D. Tian, C. Lu, C.W. Lou, et al.
Influence of fiber content on the mechanical and thermal properties of Kenaf fiber reinforced thermoplastic polyurethane composites.
Mater Des, 30 (2015), pp. 937-940
C. Merlini, V. Soldi, G.M.O. Barra.
Influence of fiber surface treatment and length on physico-chemical properties of short random banana fiber-reinforced castor oil polyurethane composites.
V. Shaniba, M.P. Sreejith, K.B. Aparna, T.V. Jinitha, E. Purushothaman.
Mechanical and thermal behavior of styrene butadiene rubber composites reinforced with silane-treated peanut shell powder.
Polym Bull, 74 (2017), pp. 3977-3994
Y. Cui, S. Lee, J. Tao.
Effects of alkaline and silane treatments on the water‐resistance properties of wood‐fiber‐reinforced recycled plastic composites.
J Vinyl Addit Technol, 14 (2008), pp. 211-220
N.M. Abdullah, I. Ahmad.
Potential of using polyester reinforced coconut fiber composites derived from recycling polyethylene terephthalate (PET) waste.
Fibers Polym, 14 (2013), pp. 584-590
D. Bachtiar, M.S. Salit, E.S. Zainudin, K. Abdan, M. Dahlan, K. Zaman.
Thermal properties of alkali-treated sugar palm fibre reinforced high impact polystyrene composites.
Pertanika J Sci Technol, 21 (2013), pp. 141-150
S.-Y. Lee, S.-J. Chun, G.-H. Doh, I.-A. Kang, S. Lee, K.-H. Paik.
Influence of chemical modification and filler loading on fundamental properties of bamboo fibers reinforced polypropylene composites.
J Compos Mater, Vol 43 (2009), pp. 1639-1657
Z.N. Azwa, B.F. Yousif, A.C. Manalo, W. Karunasena.
A review on the degradability of polymeric composites based on natural fibres.
Mater Des, 47 (2013), pp. 424-442
Copyright © 2019. The Authors
Journal of Materials Research and Technology

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
Cookies policy
To improve our services and products, we use cookies (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here.