Journal Information
Vol. 6. Issue 4.
Pages 417-422 (October - December 2017)
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 6. Issue 4.
Pages 417-422 (October - December 2017)
Original Article
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2017.08.001
Open Access
High energy ballistic and fracture comparison between multilayered armor systems using non-woven curaua fabric composites and aramid laminates
Fábio de Oliveira Bragaa,b,
Corresponding author

Corresponding author.
, Lucas Tedesco Bolzana, Fernanda Santos da Luza, Pedro Henrique Lameirão Machado Lopesa, Édio Pereira Lima Jr.a, Sergio Neves Monteiroa
a Military Institute of Engineering – IME, Department of Materials Science, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
b Faculty SENAI Rio, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Full Text
Download PDF
Figures (8)
Show moreShow less
Tables (2)
Table 1. Backface signature of the several MAS using different materials as second layer.
Table 2. Chemical composition at two points of the coarse particle.
Show moreShow less

For personal protection against high kinetic energy projectiles, multilayered armor systems (MAS) are usually the best option. They combine synergistically the properties of different materials such as ceramics, composites and metals. In the present work, ballistic tests were performed to evaluate multilayered armor systems (MAS) using curaua non-woven fabric epoxy composites as second layer. A comparison to a MAS using aramid (Kevlar™) fabric laminates was made. The results showed that the curaua non-woven fabric composites are suitable to the high ballistic applications, and are promising substitutes for aramid fabric laminates.

Natural fiber
Curaua fiber
Non-woven fabric
Aramid laminate
Ballistic test
Full Text

The protection against firearms is a matter of personal concern, especially to law-enforcement officers and military personnel, since there is a rise of local armed conflicts around the world [1]. Topics such as ballistic armor materials are gaining special attention [2,3], and thus engineers and researchers are developing new military and civilian defense products to satisfy their customer's protection needs.

On the matter of high kinetic energy projectiles, such as 7.62mm or 5.56mm caliber bullets, the application of monolithic materials as body armor (e.g. steel plates) is disadvantageous. In these cases, relatively thick pieces must be employed to provide the necessary ballistic protection. Therefore, the systems are usually heavy, compromising the portability [4,5].

For these types of threats, a combination of light materials is usually the best option. The resultant products are called composite armors [3] or multilayered armor systems (MAS) [6]. They combine synergistically the properties of materials such as ceramics, composites and metals [7].

A common configuration in the MAS is a ceramic backed by a composite, or fiber laminate. A third layer, such as a ductile metal, might also be employed on the MAS backing [7]. The ceramic front resists the incident compressive stresses, erodes the projectile's tip (spreading the load to a larger area) and absorbs a large amount of the incident energy. The composite (or fiber laminate) collects the fragments and absorbs some extra energy. The ductile metal absorbs the rest of the energy. Eventually, the system as a whole stops the projectile, transmitting the minimum possible energy to the wearer, aiming to prevent injuries and eventual lethal trauma [6].

When the projectile impacts the MAS, a shock a wave propagates through the material, and part of its energy will reflect at the interfaces [8]. The magnitude and nature (tensile or compressive) of the reflected wave will depend on the shock impedance of the material positioned after the interface, which is proportional to the material density. The lighter the material of the second layer, the higher the magnitude of the tensile wave that returns to the ceramic material, making the energy absorption more efficient [9]. Therefore, second layer must be composed of very light materials, if possible, with densities around 1g/cm3.

Currently, high strength and low weight synthetic fibers are being used as composites or laminates in the second layer of the MAS [10–12]. Fibers such as aramid (Twaron™ and Kevlar™) and high molecular weight polyethylene (Spectra™ and Dyneema™) have been the most used materials for these applications.

Despite that, other lighter and low cost materials are being investigated and considered as alternatives to integrate the MAS. A group of materials that have demonstrated good ballistic performances are the natural fiber reinforced composites [13–20]. The fiber named curaua, which is extracted from the Ananas erectifolius plant, is promising for these applications, due to its high Young's modulus, high strength and high toughness of their composites [21–25].

The properties of unidirectional curaua fiber reinforced epoxy and polyester composites as part of the MAS were previously studied [24,25]. In the present work, the objective was to investigate the ballistic properties of a curaua non-woven fabric composite, as part of a MAS, and compare its behavior as well as the mechanisms of fracture to an aramid (Kevlar™) laminate.

2Materials and methods

The MAS studied in the present work is composed of a ceramic front, a second layer of non-woven curaua fabric composite or aramid, and a back layer of an aluminum alloy, as schematically shown in Fig. 1. The ceramic was an alumina doped with 4wt.% niobia, pressed with 30MPa and sintered at 1400°C for 3h. The aluminum was a 5052 H34 alloy. The ceramic and aluminum were the same as those used in previous studies [24,25].

Fig. 1.

Schematic diagram showing the MAS ready for the ballistic tests.


The curaua non-woven fabric was supplied by Pematec Triangel (Brazil), with 0.830kg/m2 as areal density. Fig. 2 shows the general aspect of the fabric (Fig. 2a) and its epoxy composite (Fig. 2b). The diameters of 100 fibers were individually measured from the SEM micrographs, and a frequency histogram was built. The data were statistically treated by calculating the average fiber diameter and the standard deviation.

Fig. 2.

General macroscopic aspect of the (a) curaua fiber fabric and (b) its epoxy composite.


The composite was made by stacking several layers of fabric in a steel mold, intercalating with a liquid epoxy-hardener mixture and keeping the set under compressive pressure of 5MPa for 24h. The epoxy resin was the diglycidyl ether of bisphenol-A (DGEBA), hardened with 13 phr triethylenetetramine (TETA), both produced by Dow Chemical and acquired from Brazilian company Resinpoxy.

Aramid (Kevlar™) laminates were acquired from LFJ Blindagens (Brazil). They are composed of 18 plies of aramid woven fabric with areal density of 0.460kg/m2 bonded with neoprene.

Ballistic tests were performed following the procedures specified by the NIJ-0101.06 [26] body armor standard, to evaluate the protection level of the MAS. In this test (Fig. 3a), the MAS target (Fig. 3b) was positioned in front of a modeling clay witness, 15m away from the shooting device. Commercial 7.62mm M1 bullets were used as projectiles. The clay witness was a Roma Plastilina type, supplied by Corfix (Brazil), applied to simulate the consistency of the human body. The shooting device was a model B290 High Pressure Instrumentation (HPI) equipment, and the projectile's velocity measuring device was an optical barrier. According to the NIJ standard [26], the target is considered efficient as body armor if it is not perforated by the projectile and also do not imprint a large deformation on the clay witness. This deformation is called “trauma”, and must be smaller than 1.73in. (44mm) in order to avoid the lethal body injury. The ballistic test equipment is available in the Brazilian Army Assessment Center, CaEx, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Fig. 3.

“Backface signature” ballistic tests: (a) experimental arrangement; (b) MAS target.


The surface of the fabric, and the interaction zone between the projectile and the targets were observed using the scanning electron microscopy (SEM), in a model Quanta FEG 250 FEI equipment, available in IME.

3Results and discussion

Fig. 4a shows the SEM micrograph of the fabric, exhibiting its microscopic details. Fig. 4b shows the fiber diameter histogram. The fabric is composed of randomly oriented fibers, with diameters varying between 10 and 90μm, with average 40±11μm. The fibers in the fabric are relatively thin, in comparison with other natural fibers from previous works [23], and this is an important feature: the thinner the fibers, the higher are mechanical properties such as Young's modulus and strength [27]. This is attributed to the smaller amount of natural fiber structural defects.

Fig. 4.

(a) SEM micrograph of the curaua fiber fabric (100×) and (b) the frequency histogram of fiber diameters.


Fig. 5 shows the general aspect of the curaua MAS after the ballistic test. The MAS was not perforated and the curaua composite kept its integrity after the impact, not breaking into several parts. The integrity is an essential feature for practical purposes, since ceramic armors are usually applied as small tiles, so it is necessary to have a backing material to keep ceramics in position [7,24].

Fig. 5.

MAS target after the “backface signature” ballistic test.


Table 1 shows the backface signature for the different MAS, either from the present work or from previous studies [16,25]. The curaua non-woven fabric MAS prevented the lethal trauma on the clay witness, and thus it can be considered effective against the 7.62mm bullet. In comparison with aramid, the composite presented a slightly higher trauma.

Table 1.

Backface signature of the several MAS using different materials as second layer.

Second layer material  Trauma (mm)  Reference 
Epoxy reinforced with 30vol% curaua non-woven fiber fabric  28±PWa 
Epoxy reinforced with 30vol% aligned curaua fiber  22±[25] 
Plain epoxy plate  21±[25] 
Aramid fiber fabric laminate  21±[16] 

Present work.

Figs. 6 and 7 show the SEM micrographs of the impact zone on the composite. The ceramic was totally fractured, Fig. 6a, and its fragments were deposited over the fibers surfaces. Fig. 6b shows in details the effectiveness of the curaua fiber to collect the ceramic fragments. A coarse particle can be noticed in Fig. 6a, and it can be viewed in details in Fig. 7. The particle was identified as the eroded projectile covered by the ceramic fragments. The chemical composition of the projectile (point 2) and ceramic fragments (point 1), obtained by EDS, can be seen in Table 2. The identification of the projectile confirms that the ceramic is able to fragment it to very thin particles, smaller than 100μm.

Fig. 6.

Fracture micrographs of the impacted curaua MAS: (a) 1000× and (b) 5000×.

Fig. 7.

Detail of the particles found in the MAS fractured surface, within the impact zone. Points 1 and 2 had their chemical composition evaluated.

Table 2.

Chemical composition at two points of the coarse particle.

Element  Composition (%)
  Point 1  Point 2 
Al  33.75  0.33 
Nb  21.60  19.30 
31.02  2.30 
Pt  12.78  5.45 
Pb  –  72.62 

Fig. 8a shows the general aspect of the aramid MAS after the ballistic test, and Fig. 8b shows the SEM micrograph of the impact zone. The same fracture characteristics were identified. Macroscopically, the aramid laminate keeps its integrity after the impact, as seen in Fig. 8a. Microscopically, the aramid fiber is effective to collect the ceramic fragments, as shown in Fig. 8b.

Fig. 8.

Aramid fabric laminate MAS after the “backface signature” ballistic test: (a) general aspect; (b) SEM micrograph, 5000×.


  • Ballistic “backface signature” tests were performed to evaluate multilayered armor systems (MAS) using curaua non-woven fabric epoxy composites as second layer. A comparison has been made to a MAS using aramid (Kevlar™) fabric laminates.

  • The curaua non-woven fabric composite is promising for MAS applications, since there was not perforation on the ballistic test, and the backface signature did not reach 1.73in. (44mm).

  • The composite was able to keep its integrity after the ballistic impact, and showed the same microscopic fracture mechanisms as aramid, making them a promising substitute for aramid in the MAS.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


The authors of the present work thank the Brazilian supporting agencies CAPES, CNPq and FAPERJ for the funding, and the CAEx, for performing the ballistic tests.

The International Institute for Strategic Studies.
Armed Conflicts Database: Data and Analysis on Conflicts Worldwide.
IISS, (2015),
Available from: [updated 2017]
L. Wang, S. Kanesalingam, R. Nayak, R. Padhye.
Recent trends in ballistic protection.
TLIST, 3 (2014), pp. 37-47
K. Akella, N.K. Naik.
Composite armor – a review.
J Indian Inst Sci, 95 (2015), pp. 297-312
M. Grujicic, B. Pandurangan, B. d’Entremont.
The role of adhesive in the ballistic/structural performance of ceramic/polymer-matrix composite hybrid armor.
Mater Des, 41 (2012), pp. 380-393
C. Kaufmann, D. Cronin, M. Worswick, G. Pageau, A. Beth.
Influence of material properties on the ballistic performance of ceramics for personal body armor.
Shock Vib, 10 (2003), pp. 51-58
S.N. Monteiro, E.P. Lima Jr., L.H.L. Louro, L.C. Silva.
Unlocking function of aramid fibers in multilayered ballistic armor.
Metall Mater Trans A, 46 (2015), pp. 37-40
E. Medvedovski.
Ballistic performance of armour ceramics: influence of design and structure. Part 1.
Ceram Int, 36 (2010), pp. 2103-2115
M.A. Meyers.
Dynamic behavior of materials.
John Wiley & Sons, (1994),
A. Tasdermirci, G. Tunusoglu, M. Guden.
The effect of the interlayer on the ballistic performance of ceramic/composite armor: experimental and numerical study.
Int J Impact Eng, 44 (2012), pp. 1-9
A. Tabiei, G. Nilakantan.
Ballistic impact of dry woven fabric composites: a review.
Appl Mech Rev, 61 (2008), pp. 1-13
Z. Stempien.
Effect of velocity of the structure-dependent tension wave propagation on ballistic performance of aramid woven fabrics.
Fibres Text East Eur, 4 (2011), pp. 74-80
B.A. Cheeseman, T.A. Bogetti.
Ballistic impact into fabric and compliant composite laminates.
Compos Struct, 61 (2003), pp. 161-173
P. Wambua, B. Vangrimde, S. Lomov, I. Verpoest.
The response of natural fibre composites to ballistic impact by fragment simulating projectiles.
Compos Struct, 77 (2007), pp. 232-240
E. Marsyahyo, Jamasri, H.S.B. Rochardjo, R. Soekrisno.
Preliminary investigation on bulletproof panels made from ramie fiber reinforced composites for NIJ level II, IIA, and IV.
J Ind Text, 39 (2009), pp. 13-26
P.C. Akubue, P.K. Igbokwe, J.T. Nwabanne.
Production of kenaf fibre reinforced polyethylene composite for ballistic protection.
IJSER, 6 (2015), pp. 1-7
S.N. Monteiro, T.L. Milanezi, L.H.L. Louro, E.P. Lima Jr., F.O. Braga, A.V. Gomes, et al.
Novel ballistic ramie fabric composite competing with Kevlar™ fabric in multilayered armor.
Mater Des, 96 (2016), pp. 263-269
L.A. Rohen, F.M. Margem, S.N. Monteiro, C.M.F. Vieira, B.M. Araújo, E.S. Lima.
Ballistic efficiency of an individual epoxy composite reinforced with sisal fibers in multilayered armor.
Mater Res, 18 (2015), pp. 55-62
R.B. Cruz, E.P. Lima Jr., S.N. Monteiro, L.H.L. Louro.
Giant bamboo fiber reinforced epoxy composite in multilayered ballistic armor.
Mater Res, 18 (2015), pp. 70-75
F.S. Luz, E.P. Lima Jr., L.H.L. Louro, S.N. Monteiro.
Ballistic test of multilayered armor with intermediate epoxy composite reinforced with jute fabric.
Mater Res, 18 (2015), pp. 170-177
S.N. Monteiro, V.S. Candido, F.O. Braga, L.T. Bolzan, R.P. Weber, J.W. Drelich.
Sugarcane bagasse waste in composites for multilayered armor.
Eur Polym J, 78 (2016), pp. 173-185
F. Tomczak, K.G. Satyanarayana, T.H.D. Sydenstricker.
Studies on lignocellulosic fibers of Brazil: Part III – morphology and properties of Brazilian curaua fibers.
Composites A, 38 (2007), pp. 2227-2236
R. Zah, R. Hischier, A.L. Leão, I. Braun.
Curauá fibers in the automobile industry – a sustainability assessment.
J Clean Prod, 15 (2007), pp. 1032-1040
S.N. Monteiro, F.P.D. Lopes, A.P. Barbosa, A.B. Bevitori, I.L.A. Silva, L.L. Costa.
Natural lignocellulosic fibers as engineering materials – an overview.
Metall Mater Trans A, 42a (2011), pp. 2963-2974
S.N. Monteiro, F.O. Braga, E.P. Lima Jr., L.H.L. Louro, J.W. Drelich.
Promising curaua fiber-reinforced polyester composite for high-impact ballistic multilayered armor.
S.N. Monteiro, L.H.L. Louro, W. Trindade, C.N. Elias, C.L. Ferreira, E.S. Lima, et al.
Natural curaua fiber-reinforced composites in multilayered ballistic armor.
Metall Mater Trans A, 46 (2015), pp. 4567-4577
NIJ Standard 0101.06.
Ballistic resistance of body armor.
US Depart. of Justice, (2008),
S.N. Monteiro, F.P.D. Lopes, A.S. Ferreira, D.C.O. Nascimento.
Natural fiber polymer matrix composites: cheaper, tougher and environmentally friendly.
JOM, 61 (2009), pp. 17-22

Paper was a contribution part of the 3rd Pan American Materials Congress, February 26th to March 2nd, 2017.

Copyright © 2017. Brazilian Metallurgical, Materials and Mining Association
Journal of Materials Research and Technology

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
Cookies policy
To improve our services and products, we use cookies (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here.