Journal Information
Vol. 8. Issue 1.
Pages 1470-1475 (January - March 2019)
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 8. Issue 1.
Pages 1470-1475 (January - March 2019)
Original Article
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2018.10.012
Open Access
Evaluation of dynamic properties of nano oil palm empty fruit bunch filler/epoxy composites
N. Sabaa, M. Jawaida,b,
Corresponding author

Corresponding author at: Biocomposite Technology Laboratory, INTROP, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
, Othman Y. Alothmanb,c, Zeyad Almutairid
a Laboratory of Biocomposite Technology, Institute of Tropical Forestry and Forest Products (INTROP), Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
b Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
c Deanship of Graduate Studies, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh, 11673, Saudi Arabia
d Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Full Text
Download PDF
Figures (4)
Show moreShow less
Tables (2)
Table 1. Recent reported literature on the dynamic mechanical analysis of epoxy nanocomposites.
Table 2. Tg values from E″, tanδ and the peak height of tanδ curve.
Show moreShow less

Cured epoxy resins pretense a constraint for variety of advanced applications due to its notably poor thermal and dynamic (viscoelastic) properties, hence required to minimize their properties prior to their usage. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effect of nano oil palm empty fruit bunch (OPEFB) fibers at different loadings (1%, 3% and 5%) on the dynamic mechanical properties through dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) in terms of storage modulus E′, loss modulus E″ and glass transition temperature (Tg) of epoxy composites. Results explored that dynamic properties of the epoxy composites get improved remarkably by the incorporation of nano OPEFB to epoxy composites, while 3% loading displays marked decrease in damping factor with relative to pure epoxy composites and the rest. Overall we perceived that the 3% loading of nano OPEFB filler is the best and optimal to enhance dynamic mechanical properties and to modify the damping factor of the epoxy composites resulting in most promising light weight and thermally stable composite structural materials.

Oil palm fibers
Epoxy matrix
Glass transition temperature
Dynamic mechanical properties
Damping factor
Full Text

Since 1947 epoxy shows the wide industrial applications from coatings, to adhesive and marine to aerospace fields where toughness and resistance to high temperatures are required [1–4]. However, the cured epoxy resins pretense a constraint on many engineering applications due to their intrinsically fragile and brittle nature and most important inferior thermal management, low thermal conductivity and large thermal expansion that limits its end use application scope [5–8]. Natural fibers such as oil palm empty fruit bunch (OPEFB), jute, kenaf, hemp, flax, sisal and pineapple leaf [9] displays promising and cheaper substitute to expensive synthetic fibers to reinforced in polymer for improving properties. However, the dispersion of certain micro and nanoparticles as second phase (with only a fewer percentages 1–5%) is currently regarded as the most potential approach to fabricate nanocomposites [10,11]. Table 1 lists some of the recent publications on the dynamic mechanical analysis of nano fillers reinforced epoxy composites.

Table 1.

Recent reported literature on the dynamic mechanical analysis of epoxy nanocomposites.

Polymer matrix  Nano filler reinforcement  References 
Epoxy matrixGraphene nanoplatelets (GNP)  [12] 
Functionalized kaolinite (KGS)  [13] 
Copper phenylphosphate (CuPP) nanoplates  [14] 
Jack pine and spruce softwood cellulose nanofibers  [15] 
Bare or starch-modified ZnO particles  [16] 
Ramie fibers cellulose nanocrystals  [17] 
Amine-modified graphene oxide  [18] 
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes  [19] 
Boehmite, γ-alumina and α-alumina nanoparticles  [20] 
Modified clay (cloisite 20A)  [21] 
Modified clay  [22] 
Polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS)  [23] 
Polypyrrole-graphene oxide  [24] 
Reduced graphene oxide  [25] 
Sodium montmorillonite (pristine clay)  [26] 
Nano silica  [27] 
Nano cellulose from cellulose acetate (ECA)  [28] 
Silanized fullerenes (C60)  [29] 
Closite 30B  [30] 
Silane-functionalized montmorillonite  [31] 
Vertically aligned carbon nanotubes  [32] 
Silica nanoparticles  [33] 

Table 1 illustrates that the incorporation of nano fillers such as CNTs, graphite, graphene, cellulose nanoparticles, cellulose nanofibers, nanoclay and modified nanoclay in the epoxy show positive way to modify the viscoelastic properties of epoxy composites. The reported positive results on the reinforcement of nano fillers in epoxy matrix prompt us to do this present study in order to bring greener and sustainable composite materials. Besides this it is also evident from Table 1 that no research work has been conducted to analyze viscoelastic properties of nano OPEFB/epoxy composites. Present study is the extension of our previous reported research study [34,35]. The present work explored the comparative dynamic properties of the nano OPEFB filler loading of the epoxy composites.

2Materials and methods2.1Materials

Same materials including grinded OPEFB fibers, epoxy resin (D.E.R. 331), hardener Jointmine 905-3S, stainless steel mold and teflon sheets are used directly without any further purification like in our previous published study [36].

2.2Composites fabrication and DMA characterization

Similar fabrication technique for epoxy composites and nano OPEFB/epoxy composites were applied, samples were prepared [36] and their dynamic properties (E′, E″, tanδ and Cole–Cole plot) [37] were characterized as per ASTM D4065-01.

3Results and discussion3.1Storage modulus (E′)

Fig. 1 shows the E′ versus temperature of 0%, 1%, 3%, 5% nano/OPEFB filler loading to the epoxy composites. From the graph it is seen that epoxy with 0% filler showed the minimum E′ values. In other studies it was reviewed that epoxy offers low degree of stiffness and consequently have lower E[38,39]. But considerable enhancement in E′ for all nano OPEFB/epoxy composites were noticed during examination, merely due to toughness and rigid behavior of incorporated nano OPEFB, which improved the stiffness and virtuous resistance toward heat of all epoxy nanocomposites.

Fig. 1.

E′ of nano OPEFB/epoxy nanocomposites.


Result clearly revealed that nano OPEFB filler has a considerable effect on the viscoelastic properties of the epoxy as it efficiently inhibits the epoxy polymeric chains segmental motion ensued by the better dispersion. Remarkably, 3% loading confers highest E′ value when compared to 5% and 1% nano OPEFB filler loading (Fig. 1) due to better nanoparticle dispersion, effective reinforcing effect and physical filler–epoxy matrix interaction. However an increase in nano OPEFB filler loading beyond 3% increases the density resulting in the accumulation of nanoparticles within the polymeric matrix due to strong particle–particle interaction [39]. All this creates vacant spaces and voids within the polymer that enhance the rotational movement or segmental motion [40], ultimately lowering the E′ and Tg values. Comparable trend in E′ value and justifications are noticed with incorporation of nano-Al2O3 particles to the epoxy [41].

Fig. 1 also shows that below Tg the E′ values of all epoxy nanocomposites shows decreasing trend with increase in temperature. Interestingly, near Tg, a sharp decrease in E′ value was noticed revealing transition from glassy to rubbery stage of composite constituents. But above Tg the E′ values of all composites shows no remarkable change in the rubbery region revealing reduction of the moduli above 80°C to almost zero (0), as the nano particles are practically not in contact with epoxy due to high amplitude of polymer segmental motion. Hence composite components lost its ability as hard and stiffer material and became more moveable. Similar trends and agreement were noticed for silicon carbide/carbon fibers/epoxy composites having no remarkable change in E′ in the rubbery region [42]. Satisfactory increase in E′ for 3% nano OPEFB/epoxy justifies the perfect dispersion, distribution and better physical interaction on account of its higher surface area. Comparable statements were also reported in literature [43,44]. Apparent result also governed the enhanced thermal degradation temperature and stability of 3% nano OPEFB/epoxy composites [45].

3.2Loss modulus (E″)

E″ is also referred as dynamic modulus to define viscous response and “internal friction” of the materials [46–48]. Fig. 2 illustrates the compiled curves of E″ versus temperature of epoxy composites and nanocomposites at a frequency of 1Hz. Fig. 2 revealed that E″ possess similar trend with the E′ at different nano OPEFB loading in epoxy composites system.

Fig. 2.

E″ of nano OPEFB/epoxy composites.


Addition of nano filler enhance the E″ peak height of the epoxy composites, but more remarkable for 3% filler loading compared to 1% and 5%, emphasizing the case of better dispersion, distribution with no void and aggregated filler within the epoxy matrix comparative of 5% loading. Researchers also reviewed that aggregated structure within polymer matrix conferred the non-homogenous distribution and dispersion resulting in lowering of E[49].

3.3Damping factor (tanδ)

Tanδ define the damping factor [50,51] and relate the internal energy dissipation of the matrix/filler interphase of composites system [52], presented in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Tanδ of nano OPEFB/epoxy composites.


It is clear from the tanδ graph that epoxy possess highest value (0.75) revealing higher degree of molecular rotation/mobility. However, filled composites display moderately lower tanδ peak height as the added nano OPEFB lowered the damping of the epoxy matrix. Thus E′ was found highly influenced by the addition of nano filler compared to E″ in the composites [49].

Lowered tanδ value for 1% loading with relative to epoxy composites indicates perfect filler dispersion and certain constraint in polymer movement, however lowering in tanδ are apparent for 3% while its value get increased instead of further reductions when loading goes beyond 3%. Remarkably 3% nano OPEFB filler loading displays the lowest damping factor followed by 5%, as the agglomeration increases at higher loading generating more void for the polymer chain to rotate or move which ultimately improves the viscoelastic damping behavior. Analogous and comparable results were reviewed where epoxies are modified with MWCNT, nano Al2O3 particles, activated carbon black from biomass (bamboo stem, OPEFB fiber and coconut shells), amino-functionalized and carboxyl-functionalized [7,39,53,54]. Moreover, from tanδ plot it is also evident that damping increases to its maximum in the transition region at higher temperature followed by considerable reduction in the rubbery region.

3.4Glass transition temperatures (Tg)

Tg can be obtained either from the peak position of tanδ or E″ however Tg values from the E″ are more lowered but realistic and substantial as compared to Tg value from tanδ curves [47,51]. Table 2 tabulated the Tg values obtained from E″, tanδ and the peak height of tanδ curve.

Table 2.

Tg values from E″, tanδ and the peak height of tanδ curve.

Composite samples  Peak height of tanδ curve  Tg from tanδ (°C)  Tg from E″ (°C) 
Pure epoxy  0.74  62.11  60.11 
Nano filler-1%  0.67  65.23  60.13 
Nano filler-3%  0.55  65.58  62.26 
Nano filler-5%  0.58  67.01  60.63 

Table 2 illustrates that the epoxy has comparatively lower Tg (60.11°C) obtained from both E″ and tanδ peak compared to all nanocomposites due to the existence of certain movable and flexible epoxy polymer chain within the epoxy matrix [49,55,56]. Additionally, all the epoxy nanocomposites offered higher Tg with respect to epoxy composites, as the incorporated nano OPEFB acts as hindrance and decreases the empty/free spaces consequently altering the polymer segmental motion/rotation within the epoxy systems. All this results in a prominent restraint in the polymer chain mobility which eventually increase the Tg of all nanocomposites system. Relatively closer declaration also has been made in the literature report [57,58].

3.4.1Cole–Cole plot

Cole–Cole plot or wicket plot is regarded as the highly valuable and ideal tool to analyze the relationship between E″ with E[59]. Cole–Cole plot having smooth, semicircular arc suggest homogenous polymeric system having better compatibility between the reinforcement and polymer matrix [60], while imperfect or irregular shape having deviation from semicircular arc are defined phase heterogeneity, nonhomogeneous dispersion, phase segregation and micro sized nano materials aggregation due to immiscibility [47]. Fig. 4 displays the comparative Cole–Cole plot for epoxy nanocomposites.

Fig. 4.

Cole–Cole plot of nano OPEFB/epoxy composites.


Fig. 4 illustrates that epoxy composites and 1% nano OPEFB/epoxy composites conferred alike smooth and semicircular arc revealing homogenous and perfect dispersion of filler within matrix. However, in the case of 3% loading the graph shows slight deviation from semicircular, but still delivers a very smooth semi arc plot. Moreover no upward inflection was observed directing highly dispersed and miscible single polymeric phase.

But at 5% loading a strong deviance from semicircular shape display irregular arc revealing immiscibility of filler within matrix. Clumping of filler leads to irregular and heterogeneous distribution with relatively weak interfacial adhesion among nano filler-matrix. Analogous reports were also reviewed [61,62]. Interestingly, upward inflection was also noticed in 5% loading revealing high ordered two phase system structures. Overall 3% nano OPEFB filler found optimal to enhanced both E′ and E″ and Tg.

4Prospective applications of nano OPEFB/epoxy composites

Developed nanocomposites offers considerable dynamic properties and would act as promising substitute materials to the customary and expensive structural materials such as steel, cement, aggregates, aluminum rods, ceramic bricks and wood for several advance applications. Manufactured filled epoxy nanocomposites can also extend epoxy industrial applications such as batteries, supercapacitors, electrical/electronic, automotive/aerospace thermally stable components, adhesives, coatings, exterior components in constructional partitioning materials and in high performance industrial applications.


In this study nano OPEFB were successfully incorporated in epoxy and their dynamic properties were evaluated. DMA result revealed that E′, E″ and Tg in the glassy and rubbery regions of epoxy composites get enhanced after the addition of nano OPEFB filler, however it is more pronounced for 3% loading. Moreover, it is also observed that the peak height of tanδ get reduced indicating good interfacial interaction between the matrix and the added nano filler. We concluded that 3% filler loading is the effective, ideal and minimal as it displays considerably improved dynamic mechanical properties with relative to 1% and 5% loading for various structural applications.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


The authors extend their appreciation to the International Scientific Partnership Program ISPP at King Saud University for funding this research work through ISPP-0011. The authors are also grateful to Malaysian Industry-Government Group for High Technology (MIGHT) for financial support of this work under Newton-Ungku Omar Fund Grant No: 6300873.

Z.S. Pour, M. Ghaemy.
Thermo-mechanical behaviors of epoxy resins reinforced with silane-epoxide functionalized α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles.
Prog Organ Coat, 77 (2014), pp. 1316
Z.X. Zhang, J. Zhang, B.-X. Lu, Z.X. Xin, C.K. Kang, J.K. Kim.
Effect of flame retardants on mechanical properties, flammability and foamability of PP/wood–fiber composites.
Composites Part B: Eng, 43 (2012), pp. 150
T. Gómez-del Río, J. Rodríguez, R. Pearson.
Compressive properties of nanoparticle modified epoxy resin at different strain rates.
Composites Part B: Eng, 57 (2014), pp. 173
N. Saba, M.T. Paridah, K. Abdan, N.A. Ibrahim.
Effect of oil palm nano filler on mechanical and morphological properties of kenaf reinforced epoxy composites.
Constr Build Mater, 123 (2016), pp. 15
K.Y. Choe, S.Y. On, S.A. Song, J.W. Lim, J.I. You, S.S. Kim.
Study of the endurance performance of composite journal bearings under the oil cut situation.
Compos Struct, 134 (2015), pp. 772
M.K. Nishanth, N. Mallireddy.
Thermal properties of modified epoxy nano composite.
Int J Eng Res Technol, 3 (2014),
(ESRSA Publications)
W. Jiang, F.-L. Jin, S.-J. Park.
Thermo-mechanical behaviors of epoxy resins reinforced with nano-Al2O3 particles.
J Ind Eng Chem, 18 (2012), pp. 594
N. Saba, M. Jawaid, O.Y. Alothman, M. Paridah, A. Hassan.
Recent advances in epoxy resin, natural fiber-reinforced epoxy composites and their applications.
J Reinf Plast Compos, (2015),
M. Ridzuan, M.A. Majid, M. Afendi, M. Mazlee, A. Gibson.
Thermal behaviour and dynamic mechanical analysis of Pennisetum purpureum/glass-reinforced epoxy hybrid composites.
Compos Struct, (2016),
N. Saba, P.M. Tahir, M. Jawaid.
A review on potentiality of nano filler/natural fiber filled polymer hybrid composites.
Polymers, 6 (2014), pp. 2247
A.M. Asiri, M.A. Hussein, B.M. Abu-Zied, A.-E.A. Hermas.
Effect of NiLaxFe2−xO4 nanoparticles on the thermal and coating properties of epoxy resin composites.
Composites Part B: Eng, 51 (2013), pp. 11
C. Salom, M. Prolongo, A. Toribio, A. Martínez-Martínez, I.A. de Cárcer, S. Prolongo.
Mechanical properties and adhesive behavior of epoxy-graphene nanocomposites.
Int J Adhes Adhes, 84 (2018), pp. 119
L. Su, X. Zeng, H. He, Q. Tao, S. Komarneni.
Preparation of functionalized kaolinite/epoxy resin nanocomposites with enhanced thermal properties.
Appl Clay Sci, 148 (2017), pp. 103
Q. Kong, T. Wu, J. Zhang, D.-Y. Wang.
Simultaneously improving flame retardancy and dynamic mechanical properties of epoxy resin nanocomposites through layered copper phenylphosphate.
Compos Sci Technol, 154 (2018), pp. 136
N. Saba, A. Safwan, M. Sanyang, F. Mohammad, M. Pervaiz, M. Jawaid, O. Alothman, M. Sain.
Thermal and dynamic mechanical properties of cellulose nanofibers reinforced epoxy composites.
Int J Biol Macromol, 102 (2017), pp. 822
M.G. Sari, H. Vahabi, X. Gabrion, P. Laheurte, P. Zarrintaj, K. Formela, M.R. Saeb.
An attempt to mechanistically explain the viscoelastic behavior of transparent epoxy/starch-modified ZnO nanocomposite coatings.
Prog Organ Coat, 119 (2018), pp. 171
L. Yue, A. Maiorana, F. Khelifa, A. Patel, J.-M. Raquez, L. Bonnaud, R. Gross, P. Dubois, I. Manas-Zloczower.
Surface-modified cellulose nanocrystals for biobased epoxy nanocomposites.
Polymer, 134 (2018), pp. 155
F. Ferreira, F. Brito, W. Franceschi, E. Simonetti, L. Cividanes, M. Chipara, K. Lozano.
Functionalized graphene oxide as reinforcement in epoxy based nanocomposites.
Surf Interfaces, 10 (2018), pp. 100
A. Kumar, P. Ghosh, K. Yadav, K. Kumar.
Thermo-mechanical and anti-corrosive properties of MWCNT/epoxy nanocomposite fabricated by innovative dispersion technique.
Composites Part B: Eng, 113 (2017), pp. 291
Y. Chen, D. Zhang, X. Wu, H. Wang, C. Zhang, W. Yang, Y. Chen.
Epoxy/α-alumina nanocomposite with high electrical insulation performance.
Prog Nat Sci Mater Int, 27 (2017), pp. 574
A. Surendran, J. Pionteck, R. Vogel, N. Kalarikkal, V. Geethamma, S. Thomas.
Effect of organically modified clay on the morphology, rheology and viscoelasticity of epoxy–thermoplastic nanocomposites.
Polym Test, (2018),
I. Zaman, F.M. Nor, B. Manshoor, A. Khalid, S. Araby.
Influence of interface on epoxy/clay nanocomposites: 2. Mechanical and thermal dynamic properties.
Procedia Manuf, 2 (2015), pp. 23
V. Pistor, F.G. Ornaghi, H.L. Ornaghi, A.J. Zattera.
Dynamic mechanical characterization of epoxy/epoxycyclohexyl–POSS nanocomposites.
Mater Sci Eng A, 532 (2012), pp. 339
R. Moosaei, M. Sharif, A. Ramezannezhad.
Enhancement of tensile, electrical and thermal properties of epoxy nanocomposites through chemical hybridization of polypyrrole and graphene oxide.
Polym Test, 60 (2017), pp. 173
R. Aradhana, S. Mohanty, S.K. Nayak.
Comparison of mechanical, electrical and thermal properties in graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide filled epoxy nanocomposite adhesives.
Polymer, 141 (2018), pp. 109
M. Wang, X. Fan, W. Thitsartarn, C. He.
Rheological and mechanical properties of epoxy/clay nanocomposites with enhanced tensile and fracture toughnesses.
Polymer, 58 (2015), pp. 43
P. He, M. Huang, B. Yu, S. Sprenger, J. Yang.
Effects of nano-silica contents on the properties of epoxy nanocomposites and Ti-epoxy assembles.
Compos Sci Technol, 129 (2016), pp. 46
M.H. Gabr, N.T. Phong, K. Okubo, K. Uzawa, I. Kimpara, T. Fujii.
Thermal and mechanical properties of electrospun nano-celullose reinforced epoxy nanocomposites.
Polym Test, 37 (2014), pp. 51
S. Das, S. Halder, K. Kumar.
A comprehensive study on step-wise surface modification of C60: effect of oxidation and silanization on dynamic mechanical and thermal stability of epoxy nanocomposite.
Mater Chem Phys, 179 (2016), pp. 120
M. Sharifi, M. Ebrahimi, S. Jafarifard.
Preparation and characterization of a high performance powder coating based on epoxy/clay nanocomposite.
Prog Organ Coat, 106 (2017), pp. 69
A.A. Silva, K. Dahmouche, B.G. Soares.
Nanostructure and dynamic mechanical properties of silane-functionalized montmorillonite/epoxy nanocomposites.
Appl Clay Sci, 54 (2011), pp. 151
D. Ürk, E. Demir, O. Bulut, D. Çakıroğlu, F.Ç. Cebeci, M.L. Öveçoğlu, H. Cebeci.
Understanding the polymer type and CNT orientation effect on the dynamic mechanical properties of high volume fraction CNT polymer nanocomposites.
Compos Struct, 155 (2016), pp. 255
P. Dittanet, R.A. Pearson.
Effect of bimodal particle size distributions on the toughening mechanisms in silica nanoparticle filled epoxy resin.
Polymer, 54 (2013), pp. 1832
N. Saba, T.M. Paridah, K. Abdan, N.A. Ibrahim.
Preparation and characterization of fire retardant nano-filler from oil palm empty fruit bunch fibers.
BioResources, 10 (2015), pp. 4530
N. Saba, P.M. Tahir, K. Abdan, N.A. Ibrahim.
Fabrication of epoxy nanocomposites from oil palm nano filler: mechanical and morphological properties.
BioResources, 11 (2016), pp. 7721
N. Saba, M. Jawaid, M. Paridah, O. Alothman.
Physical, structural and thermomechanical properties of nano oil palm empty fruit bunch filler based epoxy nanocomposites.
Ind Crops Prod, 108 (2017), pp. 840
N. Saba, M. Paridah, K. Abdan, N. Ibrahim.
Dynamic mechanical properties of oil palm nano filler/kenaf/epoxy hybrid nanocomposites.
Constr Build Mater, 124 (2016), pp. 133
S. Joseph, S.P. Appukuttan, J.M. Kenny, D. Puglia, S. Thomas, K. Joseph.
Dynamic mechanical properties of oil palm microfibril-reinforced natural rubber composites.
J Appl Polym Sci, 117 (2010), pp. 1298
H.P.S. Abdul Khalil, M. Jawaid, P. Firoozian, E.S. Zainudin, M.T. Paridah.
Dynamic mechanical properties of activated carbon-filled epoxy nanocomposites.
Int J Polym Anal Char, 18 (2013), pp. 247
K.W. Putz, M.J. Palmeri, R.B. Cohn, R. Andrews, L.C. Brinson.
Effect of cross-link density on interphase creation in polymer nanocomposites.
Macromolecules, 41 (2008), pp. 6752
C.-H. Chen, J.-Y. Jian, F.-S. Yen.
Preparation and characterization of epoxy/γ-aluminum oxide nanocomposites.
Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manuf, 40 (2009), pp. 463
A. Nassar, E. Nassar.
Thermo and mechanical properties of fine silicon carbide/chopped carbon fiber reinforced epoxy composites.
Univers J Mech Eng, 2 (2014), pp. 287
H.P.S. Abdul Khalil, P. Firoozian, M. Jawaid, H.M. Akil, A. Hassan.
Preparation of activated carbon filled epoxy nanocomposites: morphological and thermal properties.
J Therm Anal Calorim, 113 (2013), pp. 623
K. Yang, J. Peng, C. Srinivasakannan, L. Zhang, H. Xia, X. Duan.
Preparation of high surface area activated carbon from coconut shells using microwave heating.
Bioresour Technol, 101 (2010), pp. 6163
N. Saba, M. Paridah, M. Jawaid, O. Alothman.
Thermal and flame retardancy behavior of oil palm based epoxy nanocomposites.
J Polym Environ, 26 (2018), pp. 1844
N. Hameed, P. Sreekumar, B. Francis, W. Yang, S. Thomas.
Morphology, dynamic mechanical and thermal studies on poly (styrene-co-acrylonitrile) modified epoxy resin/glass fibre composites.
Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manuf, 38 (2007), pp. 2422
M. Jawaid, H.P.S. Abdul Khalil, A. Hassan, R. Dungani, A. Hadiyane.
Effect of jute fibre loading on tensile and dynamic mechanical properties of oil palm epoxy composites.
Composites Part B: Eng, 45 (2013), pp. 619
M. Jawaid, O.Y. Alothman, N. Saba, P.M. Tahir, H.P.S.A. Khalil.
Effect of fibers treatment on dynamic mechanical and thermal properties of epoxy hybrid composites.
Polym Compos, 36 (2015), pp. 1669
S. Xu, N. Girouard, G. Schueneman, M.L. Shofner, J.C. Meredith.
Mechanical and thermal properties of waterborne epoxy composites containing cellulose nanocrystals.
Polymer, 54 (2013), pp. 6589
S.-I. Han, J.S. Lim, D.K. Kim, M.N. Kim, S.S. Im.
In situ polymerized poly (butylene succinate)/silica nanocomposites: physical properties and biodegradation.
Polym Degrad Stabil, 93 (2008), pp. 889
N. Saba, M. Jawaid, O.Y. Alothman, M. Paridah.
A review on dynamic mechanical properties of natural fibre reinforced polymer composites.
Constr Build Mater, 106 (2016), pp. 149
S. Dong, R. Gauvin.
Application of dynamic mechanical analysis for the study of the interfacial region in carbon fiber/epoxy composite materials.
Polym Compos, 14 (1993), pp. 414
A. Montazeri, N. Montazeri.
Viscoelastic and mechanical properties of multi walled carbon nanotube/epoxy composites with different nanotube content.
Mater Des, 32 (2011), pp. 2301
M. Salam, M. Hosur, S. Zainuddin, S. Jeelani.
Improvement in mechanical and thermo-mechanical properties of epoxy composite using two different functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes.
Open J Compos Mater, 3 (2013), pp. 1
M. Dehghan, R. Al-Mahaidi, I. Sbarski.
Thermo-mechanical characterization of MWCNTs-modified epoxy resin.
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Int J Chem Mol Nuclear Mater Metall Eng, 8 (2014), pp. 119
M. Jawaid, H.P.S.A. Khalil.
Effect of layering pattern on the dynamic mechanical properties and thermal degradation of oil palm-jute fibers reinforced epoxy hybrid composite.
BioResources, 6 (2011), pp. 2309
Y.C. Chiu, C.C. Huang, H.C. Tsai.
Synthesis, characterization, and thermo mechanical properties of siloxane-modified epoxy-based nano composite.
J Appl Polym Sci, 131 (2014),
K.S. Khare, F. Khabaz, R. Khare.
Effect of carbon nanotube functionalization on mechanical and thermal properties of cross-linked epoxy–carbon nanotube nanocomposites: role of strengthening the interfacial interactions.
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 6 (2014), pp. 6098
O.J. Yoon, C.Y. Jung, I.Y. Sohn, H.J. Kim, B. Hong, M.S. Jhon, N.-E. Lee.
Nanocomposite nanofibers of poly (d, l-lactic-co-glycolic acid) and graphene oxide nanosheets.
Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manuf, 42 (2011), pp. 1978
L.U. Devi, S. Bhagawan, S. Thomas.
Dynamic mechanical analysis of pineapple leaf/glass hybrid fiber reinforced polyester composites.
Polym Compos, 31 (2010), pp. 956
A. Barick, D. Tripathy.
Thermal and dynamic mechanical characterization of thermoplastic polyurethane/organoclay nanocomposites prepared by melt compounding.
Mater Sci Eng A, 527 (2010), pp. 812
H. Diao, Y. Si, A. Zhu, L. Ji, H. Shi.
Surface modified nano-hydroxyapatite/poly (lactide acid) composite and its osteocyte compatibility.
Mater Sci Eng C, 32 (2012), pp. 1796
Copyright © 2018. Brazilian Metallurgical, Materials and Mining Association
Journal of Materials Research and Technology

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
Cookies policy
To improve our services and products, we use cookies (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here.