Journal Information
Vol. 7. Issue 4.
Pages 528-534 (October - December 2018)
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 7. Issue 4.
Pages 528-534 (October - December 2018)
Original Article
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2018.04.025
Open Access
Critical length and interfacial strength of PALF and coir fiber incorporated in epoxy resin matrix
Fernanda Santos da Luz
Corresponding author

Corresponding author.
, Flávio James Humberto Tommasini Vieira Ramos, Lucio Fabio Cassiano Nascimento, André Ben-Hur da Silva Figueiredo, Sergio Neves Monteiro
Military Institute of Engineering – IME, Materials Science Department, Praça General Tibúrcio 80, Urca, 22290-270 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Full Text
Download PDF
Figures (8)
Show moreShow less
Tables (2)
Table 1. Mechanical properties of epoxy composites reinforced with 30vol% PALF and 30vol% coir fiber.
Table 2. Depth of penetration (DOP) for MAS with different composites as second layer.
Show moreShow less

The several advantages of natural lignocellulosic fibers (NLFs), such as, economical, technical, environmental and social, make these fibers an alternative to replace synthetic fibers in composite materials. The application of NLF as reinforcements in polymeric composites has increased in many industrial sectors from civil construction to automobiles. This demands the characterization of promising fibers, such as those extracted from leaves of pineapple (PALF) and the mesocarp of coconut fruit (coir fiber), for possible application in composites. In the present work, pullout tests were performed to compare the interfacial adhesion with epoxy resin of these two fibers that have greatly different characteristics. Results showed a critical length 70% higher for the coir fiber in comparison to PALF and a interfacial strength 3.5 times smaller, which indicates stronger adhesion of PALF with epoxy resin. This may be justified by the distinct morphological aspects, particularly the rougher surface of PALF. Mechanical tests were also performed in both coir fiber and PALF composites. In these tests, it was observed the superiority of mechanical properties for the composite reinforced with 30vol% of PALF. Additionally, ballistic tests were carried out. In this evaluation, composites were used in a MAS type III against the 7.62mm ammunition. The results revealed a relatively low depth of penetration (18.2mm) for the MAS with PALF composite as well as a depth of penetration (31.6mm) for MAS with coir composite, both considered efficient according to the personal body armor standard. Therefore, all these results highlight the potential of these fibers as polymer composites reinforcement in ballistic armors.

Pullout test
Natural lignocellulosic fibers
Critical length
Interface adhesion
Full Text

Over the last couple of decades, natural lignocellulosic fibers (NLFs) are increasing their market share in many sectors, such as furniture, packaging, building and automotive industries [1–5]. This growing trend is due to their low environmental impact, low cost and technical advantages in comparison to synthetic fibers [2]. However, NLFs have hydroxyl groups in their composition which makes them hydrophilic [6,7]. Indeed, the existing moisture on the surface of the fiber might reduce its interfacial adhesion inside the composite, because polymers commonly used as composite matrix have hydrophobic character. Hence, chemical surface modification or other pretreatment could be applied in NLFs to improve the interfacial adhesion [2,6,8].

Initially, Kelly and Tyson [9] proposed the pullout test to evaluate the interfacial adhesion between the fiber and matrix, and later adapted by Monteiro and D’Almeida [10] for lignocellulosic fibers. In this test, it is possible to determine the fiber critical length and the interfacial strength that are associated with the bonding efficiency of the fiber/matrix interface [10].

In the present work, the fibers extracted from the leaves of pineapple (Ananas comosus) known as PALF and the coir fibers extracted from the mesocarp of the green coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) were evaluated without pretreatment in pullout tests embedded in epoxy matrix. These fibers are byproducts of their fruits and, consequently, are inexpensive and abundantly available. The physical characteristics of these fibers differ greatly. The PALF has a high content of α-cellulose (up to 82wt%), lignin content less than 12wt% and low microfibrillar angle (14°), whereas the coir fiber is lignin-rich (>41wt%) and has around 40wt% of cellulose and microfibril angle greater than 40° [8]. Moreover, the PALF has an equivalent diameter less than 300μm [11] and the coir fiber has a higher diameter (up to 600μm) [12]. As a consequence the mechanical properties of PALF are superior than coir fiber and its behavior is quite different [2,13].

In order to compare the adhesion behavior of these two distinct fibers, pullout tests were performed to determine the critical length and interfacial adhesion of PALF and coir fiber with respect to the epoxy matrix, varying the embedded lengths of the fibers as proposed by Kelly and Tyson [9] and adapted by Monteiro and D’Almeida [10].

In addition, mechanical and ballistic tests were carried out to evaluate the influence of interfacial adhesion of PALF/epoxy and coir fiber/epoxy on the properties of their composites.

2Materials and methods

The coir fibers were supplied by the Brazilian firm “Coco Verde Reciclado” and PALF was provided by Desigan Natural Fibers, Brazil. Fig. 1 shows these fibers as received. Both fibers were dried at 60°C in an air-oven for 24h. The epoxy resin of diglycidyl ether bisphenol-A (DGEBA) and hardener triethylenetetramine (TETA) were used as matrix. These two components were mixed with a stoichiometric ratio of phr 13.

Fig. 1.

Natural lignocellulosic fibers as received: (a) coir fiber; (b) PALF.


Fig. 2 illustrates a specimen used for pullout tests. Epoxy cylindrical blocks with 8mm diameter were prepared by varying the single fiber embedded length from 2mm to 43mm for both the PALF and coir fibers. The length and diameter of the fibers were measured with a Zeiss Stemi 2000C stereoscope.

Fig. 2.

Specimen used for pullout test.


The pullout tests were performed by means of an Instron universal model 3365 machine with a speed of 0.75mm/min. Tensile tests were also carried out in 10 single fibers for both PALF and coir fiber.

The correlation between the interfacial adhesion and mechanical properties for both PALF and coir fiber in epoxy matrix was investigated through Izod and tensile tests. Epoxy composites with 30vol% of PALF as well as 30vol% coir fiber were produced, both with continuous and aligned fibers.

Izod impact tests were carried out according to the ASTM D256 standard using an instrumented XC-50 model Pantec pendulum. Composites specimens were cut with standard dimensions of 62.5×12.7×10mm and notched with a 45° of angle, transversely to fibers and the direction of compression molding. Tensile tests were conducted in a model 3365 Instron machine, according to ASTM D638 standard, with a cell load of 25kN. In order to evaluate the influence of interfacial adhesion in the dynamic response, ballistic tests were performed to compare the absorption capacity of the impact energy caused by a 7.62mm caliber high velocity ammunition in both 30 vol% PALF and 30 vol% coir fiber composites used as a second layer in a multilayered armor system (MAS). The manufacturing of MAS has been described elsewhere [14]. These tests were conducted at the Brazilian Army Evaluation Center (CAEx), in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and the ballistic performance was assessed by the depth of penetration caused in the clay witness as per NIJ 0101.06 standard [15].

Analysis by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were obtained in a model Quanta FEG 250, Fei microscope operating with secondary electrons at 5kV.

3Results and discussion

Fig. 3 shows the results of the pullout tests for the different embedded lengths (L) for both PALF and coir fibers with respect to the epoxy matrix. In the first stage, the tensile strength increases linearly with the embedded length of the fiber in the matrix. When this tensile strength reaches the fiber limit stress, then rupture occurs. The embedded length for which the fiber fails is known as critical length (lc) i.e. for lengths below lc the complete interfacial debonding occurs while at higher L the fiber failure occurs without debonding of the fiber/matrix interface. The interfacial shear strength directly influence the mechanical behavior of the composite [8]. The value of critical length defines if the fiber is long enough to act as reinforcement or it is only an incorporated load. In other words, whether or not there is stress transfer from matrix to the fiber [10].

Fig. 3.

Results of the pullout test for the different embedded lengths: (a) coir fiber with epoxy resin; (b) PALF/epoxy.


Fig. 3a presents the linear adjustments of the coir fibers pullout tensile stress vs. embedded length, which correspond to Eqs. (1)–(3):

Eqs. (4) and (5) represent the linear adjustment for PALF (Fig. 3b):

The intersection of Eqs. (1) and (2) defines the critical length (lc) for coir fiber. The same calculation could be done for PALF through Eqs. (4) and (5). The critical length is reached at L equal 7.3mm and 12.4mm for PALF and coir fiber, respectively. Since small values of lc indicate greater interfacial fiber/matrix adhesion [10], these results of 70% higher lc for coir fibers reveal better adhesion between PALF and epoxy in comparison with that of coir fiber.

As proposed by Monteiro and D’Almeida [10] it is possible to define a second critical length, Lc, for which the fiber does not detach completely from the matrix. This could be observed for coir fiber (Fig. 3a). The value of Lc is given by the intersection of Eqs. (2) and (3), resulting in a length equal 28.8mm.

It is important to note that the error bars of the tensile strength associated with L>lc are in the range of tensile strength reported in literature [2,11,16,17] and in the tensile strength of the present work. This behavior is expected and therefore corroborates the experimental data obtained.

The interfacial strength (τc) of PALF and coir fiber with respect to the epoxy matrix were evaluated by the equation of Kelly and Tyson [9]:

where σf is the tensile strength of the fiber and d is the equivalent diameter of the fiber.

For each tested fiber the equivalent diameter was measured as described in the work of Luz et al. [12]. This can be a source of dispersion for NLFs diameters because of heterogeneity in their cross sections, as shown in Fig. 4. The averages of equivalent diameters were 238μm and 314μm for PALF and coir fiber, respectively. The values obtained for interfacial strength were 1.42MPa (coir fiber) and 4.93MPa (PALF).

Fig. 4.

SEM of the heterogeneities of the NLFs cross sections: (a) coir fiber; (b) PALF.


Therefore, the PALF/epoxy interfacial adhesion was stronger than coir fiber/epoxy and PALF could more efficiently transfer the mechanical strength to the composite matrix. This higher adhesion could be attributed to the naturally rougher surface of PALF [16–20], as illustrated in Fig. 5. Indeed, a rougher surface allows an efficient penetration and anchoring of the epoxy matrix.

Fig. 5.

NLFs surfaces: (a) coir fiber; (b) PALF.


Furthermore, the coir fiber has a thin aliphatic surface layer (wax layer) which consists of a long chain of fatty acids that are incompatible with polar matrix composites, resulting in a weak interfacial adhesion, as reported in some studies [4,5,10,21,22]. As coir fibers were used in as-received condition, the presence of some protrusions with silicon-rich particles was observed on their surface (Fig. 6). This may has also contributed to low interfacial epoxy/coir fiber adhesion as noticed by Prasad et al. [21]. They found that the removal of these particles and the wax layer from the coir fiber surface through the NaOH mercerization process promoted a more rugged surface resulting in a 90% increase in interfacial strength over untreated fiber in the matrix polyester [21]. Fig. 7 reveals the better impregnation of the epoxy resin in PALF than coir fiber, which may contribute to the higher interfacial adhesion of PALF/epoxy. Moreover, higher tensile strengths obtained for single PALF fibers corroborate the trend reported in several studies indicating higher mechanical strength for NLFs with smaller diameters that could be explained by the lower probability of internal defects [2].

Fig. 6.

SEM showing the presence of some protrusions with silicon-rich particles in the surface and the debonding interface.

Fig. 7.

SEM of the interface of composites: (a) coir fiber/epoxy; (b) PALF/epoxy.


Table 1 shows the mechanical properties obtained in tensile tests and the impact energy absorbed in Izod tests for both epoxy composites reinforced with 30vol% PALF and 30vol% coir fiber, in the longitudinal direction. It is clear that the PALF composite presented more than twice the value of both tensile strength and elastic modulus when compared to the coir fiber composite. This can be explained by the predominance of the brittle fracture mechanism for coir fiber composites, which is typical of the epoxy resin. It also indicates that coir fibers acted only as composite load, and no effective reinforcement occurred in relation to the tensile properties. By contrast, a higher pullout incidence was observed in PALF composites in comparison to coir fiber composite. In PALF composites, the brittle fracture mechanisms of the epoxy matrix together with the debonding and rupture of the fiber justify a significant increase in tensile strength and stiffness.

Table 1.

Mechanical properties of epoxy composites reinforced with 30vol% PALF and 30vol% coir fiber.

Properties  Composites
  Epoxy/30vol% coir fiber  Epoxy/30vol% PALF 
Tensile strength (MPa)  28.7±11.0  86.4±16.9 
Elastic modulus (GPa)  3.18±0.30  7.97±1.40 
Elongation (%)  1.1±0.7  1.3±0.4 
Impact strength (J/m)  111.0±6.8  946.0±140.0a 

Did not occur complete breakage.

Although the heaviest hammer available (22J) was used in the Izod impact test, samples of composites reinforced with 30vol% PALF did not break completely. Therefore, the impact energy value for the PALF composite could not be compared with the result of coir fiber composite, in which a complete rupture occurred. However, the fact that PALF composite samples did not break completely is an indicative of the high toughness of this composite, provided by PALF reinforcement. In fact, if there were total rupture of this composite, the energy absorbed would be even higher. In addition, the early failure and low values of impact strength of coir fiber composite can be attributed to the weak interfacial interaction between coir fiber and epoxy resin.

DMA results are presented elsewhere [23], and support the mechanical testing results. The curves of storage modulus also indicated a greater reinforcement of epoxy composite with 30vol% PALF in comparison to 30vol% coir fiber. This trend is given by the raising of the thermal mechanical stability at high temperature denoted by a higher rubbery plateau for PALF composite. These results also revealed an increase of loss modulus and glass transition temperature values, which means an efficient stress transfer through PALF/epoxy interface.

The depth of penetration (DOP) in ballistic tests, corresponding to the residual impact energy dissipated by the MAS, was measured by means of a laser sensor and is shown in Table 2. The DOP results revealed that all values for both MAS with 30vol% coir fiber reinforced epoxy composite and 30vol% PALF/epoxy composite as second layer met the NIJ standard, i.e. both exhibited an indentation (DOP) less than 44mm [15] (Table 2).

Table 2.

Depth of penetration (DOP) for MAS with different composites as second layer.

MAS second layer  Depth of penetration (mm)  Armor test velocity (m/s)  Impact energy (kJ) 
30vol% coir fiber/epoxy  31.6±2.7  852±3.52 
30vol% PALF/epoxy  18.2±2.7  847±3.48 

Based on these results, one should notice a reduction of more than 42% in the DOP for the MAS with PALF composite in relation to the coir fiber composite. A possible explanation for it is due to the stronger PALF/epoxy interfacial adhesion. Even though some ballistic studies on epoxy composites reinforced with different synthetic fibers have shown that higher energy absorption occurs for weaker interfacial interactions [24], the adhesion between coir fiber and the epoxy resin may have been excessively weak causing premature failure of the composite tested in this work.

Fig. 8 shows the aspect of MAS, with both coir fiber and PALF composite, before and after ballistic tests. In these tests it was verified that the coir fiber composites have been almost completely spalled, owing to the brittle fracture of the epoxy matrix. Thus, the coir fiber composite could not be used, in this configuration, as a ballistic vest against high impact ammunition as 7.62mm caliber. On the other hand, the MAS with PALF composite, as a second layer, remained whole in most of samples after ballistic impact, which indicates the great potential for the application of this fiber in ballistic armor.

Fig. 8.

MAS with different second layers, before and after ballistic impact: (a) coir fiber composite; (b) PALF composite.


  • The coir fiber presented in pullout tests a critical length 70% higher than PALF, which indicates weaker interfacial adhesion between this fiber and epoxy matrix. Also, the value of interfacial strength for the PALF was 3.5 times greater than coir fiber. This result could be justified by the rougher surface of PALF and the presence of wax layer in the coir fiber;

  • A second critical length was found for the coir fiber. In the embedded length between 12.4mm and 28.8mm the coir fiber did not detach completely from the epoxy matrix;

  • It was observed that the statistic dispersion of the tensile strength associated with higher length is in the range of tensile strength for single fiber found in literature and in the present work for both PALF and coir fiber. This high dispersion is a consequence of their cross section heterogeneities;

  • Coir fiber presented an equivalent diameter 30% higher than PALF, which explains the higher strength associated with PALF and corroborate the trend reported in several related works;

  • Tensile tests showed superior mechanical properties of PALF composites as well as higher capacity of PALF composites to absorb energy in Izod test in comparison to coir fiber composite. This trend is supported by results of DMA tests already published;

  • In ballistic tests, the PALF composite exhibited the lowest depth of penetration (18.2mm), which represents a higher ballistic performance as compared to MAS with coir fiber composite. Combined, all these results highlight the potential of the PALF composite in ballistic armors.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


The authors of the present work wish to thank the Brazilian supporting agencies CAPES, CNPq and FAPERJ for the funding.

O. Faruk, A.K. Bledzki, H.P. Fink, M. Sain.
Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000–2010.
Prog Polym Sci, 37 (2012), pp. 1552-1596
S.N. Monteiro, F.P.D. Lopes, A.P. Barbosa, A.B. Bavitori, I.L.A. Silva, L.L. Costal.
Natural lignocellulosic fibers as engineering materials – an overview.
Metal Mater Trans A, 42A (2011), pp. 2963-2974
S.N. Monteiro, F.P.D. Lopes, A.S. Ferreira, D.C.O. Nascimento.
Natural-fiber polymer-matrix composites: cheaper, tougher, and environmentally friendly.
JOM, 61 (2009), pp. 17-22
R.C.M.P. Aquino, S.N. Monteiro, J.R.M. D’Almeida.
Evaluation of the critical fiber length of piassava (Attalea funifera) fibers using the pullout test.
J Mater Sci Lett, 22 (2003), pp. 1495-1497
S.N. Monteiro, R.C.M.P. Aquino, F.P.D. Lopes.
Performance of curaua fibers in pullout tests.
J Mater Sci, 43 (2008), pp. 489-492
A.K. Bledzki, J. Gassan.
Composites reinforced with cellulose based fibres.
Prog Polym Sci, 4 (1999), pp. 221-274
D. Nabi Sahed, J.P. Jog.
Natural fiber polymer composites a review.
Adv Polym Technol, 18 (1999), pp. 351-363
S.N. Monteiro, K.G. Satyanarayana, F.M. Margem, A.S. Ferreira, D.C.O. Nascimento, H.P.G. Santafé Jr, et al.
Interfacial shear strength in lignocellulosic fibers incorporated polymeric composites.
Cellulose fibers: bio- and nano-polymer composites, pp. 241-262
A. Kelly, W.R. Tyson.
Tensile properties of fibre-reinforced metals: copper/tungsten and copper/molybdenum.
J Mech Phys Solids, 13 (1965), pp. 329-338
S.N. Monteiro, J.R.M. D’Almeida.
Pullout testing in lignocellulosic fibers – an analysis of methodology.
Rev Mater, 11 (2006), pp. 189-196
[in Portuguese]
S. Kalia, B.S. Kaith, I. Kaurs.
Cellulose fibers: bio and nano-polymer composites.
1st ed., Springer, (2011),
F.S. Luz, S. Paciornik, S.N. Monteiro, L.C. da Silva, F.J. Tommasini, V.S. Candido.
Porosity assessment for different diameters of coir lignocellulosic fibers.
JOM, 69 (2017), pp. 2045-2051
K.G. Satyanarayana, K. Sukumaran, P.S. Mukherjee, C. Pavithran, S.G. Pillai.
Natural fibre-polymer composites.
Cem Conc Comp, 12 (1990), pp. 117-136
F.S. Luz, S.N. Monteiro, E.S. Lima, E.P. Lima Junior.
Ballistic application of coir fiber reinforced epoxy composite in multilayered armor.
National Institute of Justice.
NIJ 0101.06: ballistic resistance of body armor.
National Institute of Justice, (2008),
K.G. Satyanarayana, W. Fernando.
Characterization of natural fibers.
Engineering biopolymers: homopolymers, blends and composites,
S. Kalia, B.S. Kaith, I. Kaur.
Pretreatments of n atural fibers and their application as reinforcing material in polymer composites—a review.
Polym Eng Sci, 49 (2009), pp. 1253-1272
H. Ma, C.W. Joo.
Influence of surface treatments on structural and mechanical properties of bamboo fiber-reinforced poly(lactic acid) biocomposites.
J Comp Mater, 45 (2011), pp. 2455-2463
P.J.H. Franco, A. Valadez-González.
Fiber–matrix adhesion in natural fiber composites.
Natural fibers biopolymers and biocomposites,
M.Z. Rong, M.Q. Zhang, Y. Liu, G.C. Yang, H.M. Zeng.
The effect of fiber treatment on the mechanical properties of unidirectional sisal-reinforced epoxy composites.
Comp Sci Technol, 61 (2001), pp. 1437-1447
S.V. Prasad, C. Pavithran, P.K. Rohatgi.
Alkali treatment of coir fibres for coir–polyester composites.
J Mater Sci, 18 (1983), pp. 1443-1454
M. Brahmakumar, C. Pavithran, R.M. Pillai.
Coconut fibre reinforced polyethylene composites: effect of natural waxy surface layer of the fibre on fibre/matrix interfacial bonding and strength of composites.
Compos Sci Technol, 65 (2005), pp. 563-569
F.S. Luz, S.N. Monteiro, F.J. Tommasini.
Evaluation of dynamic mechanical properties of PALF and coir fiber reinforcing epoxy composites.
G. Faur-Csukat.
A study on the ballistic performance of composites.
Macromol Symp, 239 (2006), pp. 217-226

Paper was part of technical contributions presented in the events part of the ABM Week 2017, October 2nd to 6th, 2017, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Copyright © 2018. Brazilian Metallurgical, Materials and Mining Association
Journal of Materials Research and Technology

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
Cookies policy
To improve our services and products, we use cookies (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here.